Abstract
Inventories that measure approaches to learning have revealed that certain approaches are associated with better academic performance. However, these inventories were developed primarily with higher education students on non-vocational courses and recent research shows they fail to capture the full range of healthcare students’ intentions and motivations for learning. To develop a new inventory measuring approaches to learning that addresses these shortfalls and is relevant to students on vocational courses in healthcare. In depth interviews with healthcare students were performed to understand the full range of healthcare students’ intentions and motivations. The data were used to create a draft inventory, which was reviewed by interview participants and then tested with medical students. The final inventory was piloted with 303 healthcare students across six disciplines. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify groups of related items within the inventory. The research produced a 32 item scale based on rich qualitative data, with a four factor structure and good internal consistency. A desire to link theory and practice was a distinctive feature of healthcare students. The new inventory contains nuanced items that enable a better understanding of their common and distinctive intentions and motivations. This study suggests that healthcare student populations have some unique intentions and motivations for learning and therefore require a bespoke inventory to ensure that important aspects are not missed. It offers a new tool for meaningful future research, the Healthcare Learning and Studying Inventory (HLSI).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous. (2001). Learning and studying questionnaire (ALSI). Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses (ETL) Universities of Edinburgh, Durham and Coventry. http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/questionnaires/LSQ.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2011.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Network.
Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119, 166.e7–166.e16.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37, 830–837.
Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325–346.
Evans, C., & Cools, E. (2011). Applying styles research to educational practice. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 249–254.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Gibbs, G. (2000). Improving the quality of student learning. In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Researching student learning. Technical and educational services. Bristol: Open University Press.
Mattick, K., & Knight, L. (2008). The importance of vocational and social aspects of approaches to learning for medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 629–644.
McManus, I. C., Richards, P., & Winder, B. C. (1999). Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: Prospective longitudinal study of UK medical students. British Medical Journal, 319, 542–546.
McManus, I. C., Richards, P., Winder, B. C., & Sproston, K. A. (1998). Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning style in medical students: Prospective study. British Medical Journal, 316, 345–350.
Newble, D. I., Entwistle, N. J., Hejka, E. J., Jolly, B. C., & Whelan, G. (1998). Towards the identification of student learning problems: The development of a diagnostic inventory. Medical Education, 22, 518–526.
Oppenheim, A. N. (2008). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (new ed.). London: Continuum.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival guide (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (1983). The context of learning in academic departments. In N. J. Entwistle & P. Ramdsen (Eds.), Understanding student learning. London, Canberra: Croom Helm.
Richardson, J. T. E., Dawson, L., Sadlo, G., Jenkins, V., & McInnes, J. (2007). Perceived academic quality and approaches to studying in the health professions. Medical Teacher, 29, e108–e116.
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Schifferdecker, K. E., & Reed, V. A. (2009). Using mixed methods research in medical education: Basic guidelines for researchers. Medical Education, 43, 637–644.
Slaats, A., Lodewijks, H. G. L. C., & van der Sanden, J. M. M. (1999). Learning styles in secondary vocational education: Disciplinary differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, 475–492.
Smith, L., Saini, B., Krass, I., Chen, T., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., & Sainsbury, E. (2007). Pharmacy students’ approaches to learning in an Australian university. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71, 1–6.
Streiner, D., & Norman, G. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Van Rossum, E., & Schenk, S. (1984). The relationship between learning conceptions, study strategy and learning outcome. British Education Research Journal, 54, 73–83.
Vanthournout, G., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2009). Alternative angles in research on student learning: Illustrations of a case-oriented and developmental perspective. Reflecting Education, 5, 35–51.
Vermunt, J. (1994) The inventory of learning styles. Via personal communication from the author, April 2009.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded internally as an MPhil research studentship. KM and WK designed the initial study, supervised the data collection, supervised and contributed to the data analysis, and reviewed successive drafts of the manuscript. LB developed the initial protocol, led the data collection and analysis, and led the process of writing the manuscript. KM drafted the manuscript and all authors approved the final draft of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baxter, L., Mattick, K. & Kuyken, W. Assessing health care students’ intentions and motivations for learning: the Healthcare Learning and Studying Inventory (HLSI). Adv in Health Sci Educ 18, 451–462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9383-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9383-y