Skip to main content
Log in

Pattern of morphological variations in Alghad snowtrout, Schizopyge niger (Heckel 1838) from Kashmir Himalaya using truss network analysis

  • Full Paper
  • Published:
Ichthyological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 278 Schizopyge niger (Alghad snowtrout) samples were collected from three water bodies of Kashmir Himalaya and studied for body shape morphometrics. The truss method was used to generate 21 morphometrics from 11 landmarks using the software applications tpsUtil, tpsDig2 version 2.1 and PAST. The allometrically transformed truss measurements were subjected to factor analysis, classification by cross validation of discriminant function analysis and univariate analysis of variance. The step-wise discriminant function analysis retained two variables that significantly discriminated the populations. Head and body depth morphometrics had high-magnitude loadings on the first factor, and those from the caudal peduncle had high-magnitude loadings on the second factor. Using these variables, 90.6 % of the original groups were classified into their correct samples and 89.2 % of the cross-validated groups omitting one procedure were classified into their correct samples. Slight overlapping was observed between the samples of River Jhelum and Lidder (17.9 %). The occurrence of separate stocks may be the result of changing physical and ecological conditions of water bodies in Kashmir Himalaya.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AnvariFar H, Khyabani A, Farahmand H, Vatandoust S, AnvariFar H, Jahageerdar S (2011) Detection of morphometric differentiation between isolated up- and downstream populations of Siah Mahi (Capoeta capoeta gracilis) (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in the Tajan River (Iran). Hydrobiologia 673:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherian A, Rahmani H (2009) Morphological discrimination between two populations of Shemaya, Chalcalburnus chalcoides (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) using a truss network. Anim Biodivers Conserv 32:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg GA, Friedland KD, Pearce JB (1999) Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fish Res 43:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booke HE (1981) The conundrum of the stock concept—are nature and nurture definable in fishery science? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1479–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadrin SX, Friedland KD (1999) The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fish Res 43:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott NG, Haskard K, Koslow JA (1995) Morphometric analysis of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) off the continental slope of southern Australia. J Fish Biol 46:202–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esguicero ALH, Arcifa SA (2010) Fragmentation of a neotropical migratory fish population by a century old dam. Hydrobiologia 638:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckel JJ (1838) Fische aus Caschmir gesammelt und herausgegeben von Carl Freiherrn von Hügel. Beschrieben von J. J Heckel, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Hora SL (1954) The evolution of the Indian torrential environment and its fishes. Bull Nat Inst Sci India 17:437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourston AS (1982) Homing by Canada’s west coast herring to management units and divisions as indicated by tag recoveries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:1414–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICES (2007) Report of the stock identification methods working group (SIMWG). ICES Document CM 2007/LRC12

  • Ihssen PE, Booke HE, Casselman JM, McGlade JM, Payne NR, Utter FM (1981) Stock identification: materials and methods. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1838–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iles TD, Sinclair M (1982) Atlantic herring stock discreteness and abundance. Science 215:627–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2012) The IUCN Red List of threatened species, version 2012.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 17 October 2012

  • Keast A (1978) Trophic and spatial interrelationships in the fish species of Ontario temperate lake. Environ Biol Fishes 13:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Sabah (2013) Length–weight and length–length relationships for five fish species from Kashmir Valley. J Appl Ichthyol 29:283–284

  • Khan MA, Miyan K, Khan S (2012) Morphometric variation of snakehead fish, Channa punctatus, populations from three rivers. J Appl Ichthyol 28:154–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocovsky PM, Knight CT (2012) Morphological evidence of discrete stocks of yellow perch in Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 38:534–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macholan M, Mikula O, Vohralık V (2008) Geographic phenetic variation of two eastern-Mediterranean non-commensal mouse species, Mus macedonicus and M. cypriacus (Rodentia: Muridae) based on traditional and geometric approaches to morphometrics. Zool Anz 247:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra YR (1970) Studies on the seasonal changes in the ovary of Schizothorax niger Heckel from Dal Lake in Kashmir. Jpn J Ichthyol 17:110–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir JI, Sarkar UK, Dwivedi AK, Gusain OP, Jena JK (2013) Stock structure analysis of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) across the Ganga basin (India) using a truss network system. J Appl Ichthyol. doi:10.1111/jai.12141

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T (1992) Considerations of stock structure of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Indian Ocean based on fishery data. Fish Oceanogr 1:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro A, Teixeira CM, Rego AL, Marques JF, Cabral HN (2005) Genetic and morphological variation of Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810) along the Portuguese coast. Fish Res 73:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulet N, Berrebi P, Crivelli AJ, Lek S, Argillier C (2004) Genetic and morphometric variations in the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) of a fragmented delta. Archiv Fuer Hydrobiologie 159:531–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raina HS, Petr T (1999) Coldwater fish and fisheries in the Indian Himalayas: lakes and reservoirs. In: Petr T (ed) Fish and fisheries at higher latitudes: Asia. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 385. FAO, Rome, pp 64–88

  • Rohlf FJ (2006) tpsDig2, version 2.1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph. Accessed 29 September 2008

  • Sajina AM, Chakraborty SK, Jaiswar AK, Pazhayamadam DG, Sudheesan D (2011) Stock structure analysis of Megalaspis cordyla (Linnaeus, 1758) along the Indian coast based on truss network analysis. Fish Res 108:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafi S, Yousuf AR (2012) Length-weight relationship and condition factor of Schizothorax niger (Heckel, 1838) Misra from Dal lake, Kashmir. Intl J Sci Res Publ 2:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow A (1990) A randomization test for misclassification probability in discriminant analysis. Ecology 71:2379–2382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss RE, Bookstein FL (1982) The truss: body form reconstruction in morphometrics. Syst Zool 31:113–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe RS, Leamy L (1983) Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid House Mice (Mus sp.): multivariate analysis of size and shape. J Zool (London) 199:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turan C (1999) A note on the examination of morphometric differentiation among fish populations: the truss system. Turk J Zool 23:259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Turan C (2004) Stock identification of Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) using morphometric and meristic characters. ICES J Mar Sci 61:774–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng TD (2004) Morphological variation between populations of spotted mackerel (Scomber australasicus) off Taiwan. Fish Res 68:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberger PH (1992) Plasticity of fish body shape. The effects of diet, development, family and age in two species of Geophagus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Biol J Linn Soc 45:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Director, Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research, Bhimtal, for providing necessary facilities. The help of fishermen of Kashmir Valley is highly acknowledged. The authors would also like to acknowledge the editor of Ichthyological Research and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javaid Iqbal Mir.

About this article

Cite this article

Mir, J.I., Mir, F.A., Chandra, S. et al. Pattern of morphological variations in Alghad snowtrout, Schizopyge niger (Heckel 1838) from Kashmir Himalaya using truss network analysis. Ichthyol Res 60, 256–262 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-013-0347-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-013-0347-x

Keywords

Navigation