Skip to main content
Log in

Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of norvancomycin

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, population pharmacokinetics (PPK) and pharmacodynamics of norvancomycin in patients were investigated. The studied dataset was derived from 146 patients with confirmed or suspected gram-positive bacterial infections, as well as 20 healthy volunteers. A PPK model was developed and validated by the nonlinear mixed effect model (NONMEM) software. The norvancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for the isolates from patients were determined by the agar dilution method. The best model was a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with exponential inter-individual error and an additive residual error statistic model. The findings of the present study indicated that the change in CLcr values had different effects on drug clearance (CL). In patients with renal dysfunction (CLcr≤85 ml/min), CL (L/h)=2.54·(CLcr /50)1.20, while in patients with normal renal function (CLcr>85 ml/min), CL=6.0·(WT/60)0.52. An increased volume of peripheral distribution (V2) was observed when norvancomycin was co-administered with diuretics. Inter-individual variability in CL, V1, Q, and V2 was 35.92%, 11.40%, 0, and 79.75%, respectively. Residual variability was 3.05 mg/L. The logistic stepwise analyses revealed that only the ratio of AUC24 /MIC was a major factor which could significantly predict the clinical outcome and bacterial eradication in patients. As the AUC24/MIC ratio was >579.90 for staphylococcal infection and >637.67 for enterococcal infections, approximately 95% of patients would be predicted to achieve a cured clinical outcome. In conclusion, AUC24/MIC should be a major pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) parameter to predict the clinical efficacy of norvancomycin. An optimized regimen of norvancomycin can be simulated and developed for different subgroups of patients who have special physiologic and pathologic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Morgan M, Evans-Williams D, Salmon R, Hosein I, Looker DN, Howard A (2000) The population impact of MRSA in a country: the national survey of MRSA in Wales, 1997. J Hosp Infect 44(3):227–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang YY (2001) Development of antibiotics in the treatment of gram-positive cocci infections. Chin J Infect Chemother 1(1):50–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shanghai Surveillance of Bacterial Resistance Working Group (2002) Surveillance of bacterial resistance in Shanghai. Chin J Infect Chemother 2(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang F (2006) CHINET 2005 surveillance of bacterial resistance in China. Chin J Infect Chemother 6(5):289–295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang F (2004) Vancomycin and norvancomycin. In: Wang F (ed) Practical anti-infectious therapeutics. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing, pp 281–283

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Wu JF, Xiao ZL, Sheng RY, Lu XJ, Chen Y, Zhang YY (2004) The adverse reactions of parenteral norvancomycin in 1031 patients. Chin J Intern Med 43(11):815–819

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buelga DS, Gatta MMF, Herrera EV, Dominguez-Gil A, García MJ (2005) Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in patients with hematological malignancies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49(12):4934–4941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimura T, Sunakawa K, Matsuura N, Kubo H, Shimada S, Yago K (2004) Population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin, vancomycin, and panipenem in neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48(4):1159–1167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheiner LB, Grasela TH Jr (1991) An introduction to mixed effect modeling: concepts, definitions, and justification. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 19(Suppl):11S–24S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yasuhara M, Iga T, Zenda H, Okumura K, Oguma T, Yano Y, Hori R (1998) Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in Japanese adult patients. Ther Drug Monit 20(2):139–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Z, Zhai SD (2004) The development of nonlinear mixed effects model in study of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Foreign Medical Sciences Section on Pharmacy 31(4):236–240

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang J, Hu JY, Yu JC, Cao GY, Shi YG, Zhang YY (2003) Clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of norvancomycin. Chin J Infect Chemother 3(4):202–205

    Google Scholar 

  13. Craig WA (1998) Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 26(1):1–10, quiz 11–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frimodt-Møller N (2002) How predictive is PK/PD for antibacterial agents. Int J Antimicrob Agents 19:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li C, Kuti JL, Nightingale CH, Mansfield DL, Dana A, Nicolau DP (2005) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 56(2):388–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Wart S, Phillips L, Ludwig EA, Russo R, Gajjar DA, Bello A, Ambrose PG, Costanzo C, Grasela TH, Echols R, Grasela DM (2004) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of garenoxacin in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48(12):4766–4777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhanel GG (2001) Influence of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles on antibiotic selection. Curr Infect Dis Rep 3:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhong SL, Huang M, Zhao XL (2003) Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rational for antimicrobial agents dose regimen. Chin J Infect Chemother 3(3):177–180

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moise-Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ (2004) Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Pharmacokinet 43(13):925–942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by HTRDP (863 Project) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Shi, Y. et al. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of norvancomycin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27, 275–284 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0435-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0435-9

Keywords

Navigation