Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attributing attention: the use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research has shown that domestic dogs are particularly good at determining the focus of human attention, often outperforming chimpanzees and hand-reared wolves. It has been suggested that the close evolutionary relationship between humans and dogs has led to the development of this ability; however, very few other domestic species have been studied. We tested the ability of 36 domestic horses to discriminate between an attentive and inattentive person in determining whom to approach for food. The cues provided were body orientation, head orientation or whether the experimenters’ eyes were open or closed. A fourth, mixed condition was included where the attentive person stood with their body facing away from the subjects but their head turned towards the subject while the inattentive person stood with their body facing the subject but their head turned away. Horses chose the attentive person significantly more often using the body cue, head cue, and eye cue but not the mixed cue. This result suggests that domestic horses are highly sensitive to human attentional cues, including gaze. The possible role of evolutionary and environmental factors in the development of this ability is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnetta B, Hare B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim Cogn 3:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen IL, Naevdal E, Boe KE, Bakken M (2006) The significance of theories in behavioural ecology for solving problems in applied ethology—possibilities and limitations. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth J, Reaux JE, Povinelli DJ (2005) Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) use of gaze cues in object-choice tasks: different methods yield different results. Anim Cogn 8:84–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartosova J, Dvorakova R, Vancatova M, Svobodova I (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gesture in domestic horses: effect of training method. In: Krueger K (ed) International Equine Science Meeting, University of Regensburg, Germany

  • Brauer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88:299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulloch MJ, Boysen ST, Furlong EE (2008) Visual attention and its relation to knowledge states in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 76:1147–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J, Brauer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock J (1999) A natural history of domesticated animals. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JJ (2007) Equine learning behaviour: common knowledge and systematic research. Behav Processes 76:24–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari PF, Kohler E, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2000) The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13997–14002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flombaum JI, Santos LR (2005) Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Curr Biol 15:447–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Varga O, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Anim Cogn 7:144–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gácsi M, Kara E, Belényi B, Topál J, Miklósi Á (2008) The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Anim Cogn 12:471–479. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0208-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giret N, Miklósi Á, Kreutzer M, Bovet D (2008) Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn 12:1–10. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0163-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin D (1999) The importance of ethology in understanding the behaviour of the horse. Equine Vet J Suppl 28:15–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin D (2002) Horse behaviour: evolution, domestication and feralisation. In: Waran N (ed) The welfare of horses. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Tomasello M (2004) Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Anim Behav 68:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59:771–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2001) Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Anim Behav 61:139–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harman AM, Moore S, Hoskins R, Keller P (1999) Horse vision and an explanation for the visual behaviour originally explained by the ‘ramp retina’. Equine Vet J 31:384–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hattori Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2007) I know you are not looking at me: capuchin monkeys’ (Cebus apella) sensitivity to human attentional states. Anim Cogn 10:141–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter AB, Cantero M, Hopkins WD (2001) Differential use of vocal and gestural communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in response to the attentional status of a human (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:337–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter AB, Russel JL, Freeman H, Hopkins WD (2007) Now you see me now you don’t: evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of the eyes in attention. Anim Cogn 10:55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Itakura S, Bryan A, Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Chimpanzee use of human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Dev Sci 2:448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen P (2002) The ethology of domestic animals: an introductory text. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2004) Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes’ begging behavior from humans. Anim Cogn 7:216–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim Behav 69:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavens DA, Hostetter AB, Wesley MJ, Hopkins WD (2004) Tactical use of unimodal and bimodal communication by chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 67:467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maros K, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 11:457–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Moss C, Sayialel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Moss C, Durant SM, Baker L, Sayialel S (2001) Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science 292:491–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley J, Sambrook TD (2000) Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 3:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi A, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi A, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13:763–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi A, Pongrácz N, Lakatos G, Topál J, Csányi V (2005) A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J Comp Psychol 119:179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Outram AK, Stear NA, Bendrey R, Olsen S, Kasparov A, Zaibert V, Thorpe N, Evershed RP (2009) The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science 323:1332–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pack AA, Herman LM (2004) Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referent of both static and dynamic human gazing and pointing in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 118:160–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfungst O (1965) Clever Hans (the horse of Mr. von Osten). In: Rosenthal R (ed) Holst (Rinehardt & Winston), New York

  • Povinelli DJ, Eddy TJ (1996) What young chimpanzees know about seeing. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 61:153–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proops L, McComb K, Reby D (2009) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:947–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Anim Behav 75:1003–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheumann M, Call J (2004) The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Anim Cogn 7:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schloegl C, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T (2008) Modifying the object-choice task: is the way you look important for ravens? Behav Processes 77:61–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab C, Huber L (2006) Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J Comp Psychol 120:169–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AD, Janik VM, Slater PJB (2003) A gray seal’s (Halichoerus grypus) responses to experimenter-given pointing and directional cues. J Comp Psychol 117:355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto A, Fujita K (2008) Are horses (Equus caballus) sensitive to human attentional states? In: Krueger K (ed) International Equine Science Meeting, University of Regensburg, Germany

  • Timney B, Keil K (1992) Visual acuity in the horse. Vis Res 32:2289–2293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Hare B, Lehmann H, Call J (2007) Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: the cooperative eye hypothesis. J Hum Evol 52:314–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tschudin A, Call J, Dunbar RIM, Harris G, van der Elst C (2001) Comprehension of signs by dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Comp Psychol 115:100–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76:1767–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vervill S, McDonnell S (2008) Equal outcomes with and without human-to-horse eye contact when catching horses and ponies in an open pasture. J Equine Vet Sci 28:309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vick SJ, Anderson JR (2003) Use of human visual attention cues by olive baboons (Papio anubis) in a competitive task. J Comp Psychol 117:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Virányi Z, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi A, Csányi V (2004) Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behav Processes 66:161–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11:373–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waring G (2003) Horse behaviour, 2nd edn. Noyes & William Andrew, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells SM, Goldschmidt-Rothschild BV (1979) Social behavior and relationships in a herd of Camargue horses. Z Tierpsychol 49:363–380

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the members of staff at The Sussex Horse Rescue Trust and the owners of the horses at the Woodingdean livery yard for their support and willingness to facilitate this project. We also thank Ben Colwell and Laura Hazelton who contributed to this study in the course of their final year undergraduate research projects and Graeme Shannon and James McMichen for their help with data collection. The study complies with the United Kingdom Home Office regulations concerning animal research and welfare as well as the University of Sussex regulations on the use of animals. This work is supported by a quota studentship from the BBSRC (to L.P., supervised by K.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Mammal Vocal Communication Research, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK

    Leanne Proops & Karen McComb

Authors
  1. Leanne Proops
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen McComb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leanne Proops.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proops, L., McComb, K. Attributing attention: the use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 13, 197–205 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0257-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0257-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation