Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal privatization in a mixed duopoly with consistent conjectures

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that partially privatizing a public firm alters underlying conjectures, in turn, changing the optimal degree of privatization. The consistent conjectures equilibrium (CCE) generates substantially greater optimal privatization than does any conjecture shared between the firms including the standard Cournot–Nash equilibrium (CNE). Yet, when the private rival is foreign, the CCE generates substantially less privatization than the CNE. The optimal extent of privatization with a domestic rival exceeds that with a foreign rival in the CCE as well as in the CNE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altintig A, Peren Arin K, Feess E, Schumacher CR (2009) You are one of us now! How do share prices of rivals react to privatization?. J Ind Econ 57: 265–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar V, Gupta B, Khan M (2006) Partial privatization and yardstick competition: evidence from the employment dynamics in Bangladesh. Econ Transition 14: 459–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti B, Fantini M, Siniscalco D (2004) Privatization around the world: evidence from panel data. J Public Econ 88: 305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral LMB (1995) Conjectural variations as a reduced form. Econ Lett 49: 397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao C-C, Yu ESH (2006) Partial privatization, foreign competition and optimum tariff. Rev Int Econ 14: 87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadpay A, Heywood JS (2006) Mixed oligopoly in a single international market. Aust Econ Pap 45: 269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFraja G, Delbono F (1989) Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Econ Pap 41: 302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganis R (2001) The airline business in the 21st century. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjell K, Pal D (1996) A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Can J Econ 29: 737–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JW (1983) Oligopoly theory. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara K (2007) Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. J Econ 92: 51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta N (2005) Partial privatization and firm performance. J Finance 60: 987–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood JS, Ye G (2009) Partial privatization in a mixed oligopoly with an R&D rivalry. Bull Econ Res 61: 165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt CA (1985) An experimental test of the consistent-conjectures hypothesis. Am Econ Rev 75: 314–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashik I, Matsumura T (2006) R&D competition between public and private sectors. Eur Econ Rev 50: 1347–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itaya J-i, Shimomura K (2001) A dynamic conjectural variations model in the private provision of public goods: a differential game approach. J Public Econ 81: 153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalashnikov V, Kemfert C, Kalashnikov V (2009) Conjectural variations equilibrium in a mixed duopoly. Eur J Oper Res 192: 717–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-H, Hwang H-S (2003) Partial ownership for the public firm and competition. Jpn Econ Rev 54: 324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin MH (2007) Partial privatization in mixed oligopoly with foreign competitors. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Osaka, November

  • Martin S (2002) Advanced industrial economics, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T (1998) Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. J Public Econ 70: 473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T, Kanda O (2005) Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. J Econ 84: 7–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maw J (2002) Partial privatization in transition economies. Econ Syst 26: 271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Suetrong K (2009) Privatization, strategic foreign direct investment and host-country welfare. Eur Econ Rev (forthcoming)

  • Ohori S (2006) Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly. J Regul Econ 29: 225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otchere I (2007) Does the response of competitors to privatization announcements reflect competitive or industry-wide information effects? International evidence. J Empir Finance 14: 523–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otchere I, Chan J (2003) Intra-industry effects of bank privatization: a clinical analysis of the privatization of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. J Banking Finance 27: 949–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D (1998) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Econ Lett 61: 181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D, White MD (1998) Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Econ J 65: 264–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perloff JM, Karp LS, Golan A (2007) Estimating market power and strategies. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perry MK (1982) Oligopoly and consistent conjectural variations. Bell J Econ 13: 197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz P (2000) Partial privatization and incomplete contracts: the proper scope of government reconsidered. FinanzArchiv 57: 394–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Ni Y, Wen F, Hou Z, Wu FF (2003) Conjectural variation based bidding strategy in spot markets: fundamentals and comparison with classical game theoretical bidding strategies. Electr Power Syst Res 67: 45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White MD (2001) Managerial incentives and the decision to hire managers in markets with public and private firms. Eur J Polit Econ 17: 877–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangliang Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heywood, J.S., Ye, G. Optimal privatization in a mixed duopoly with consistent conjectures. J Econ 101, 231–246 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-010-0156-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-010-0156-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation