Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mouse Social Interaction Test (MoST): a quantitative computer automated analysis of behavior

  • Translational Neurosciences - Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Neural Transmission Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rodents are the most commonly used preclinical model of human disease assessing the mechanism(s) involved as well as the role of genetics, epigenetics, and pharmacotherapy on this disease as well as identifying vulnerability factors and risk assessment for disease critical in the development of improved treatment strategies. Unfortunately, the majority of rodent preclinical studies utilize single housed approaches where animals are either entirely housed and tested in solitary environments or group housed but tested in solitary environments. This approach, however, ignores the important contribution of social interaction and social behavior. Social interaction in rodents is found to be a major criterion for the ethological validity of rodent species-specific behavioral characteristics (Zurn et al. 2007; Analysis 2011). It is also well established that there is significant and growing number of reports, which illustrates the important role of social environment and social interaction in all diseases, with particularly significance in all neuropsychiatric diseases. Thus, it is imperative that research studies be able to add large-scale evaluations of social interaction and behavior in mice and benefit from automated tracking of behaviors and measurements by removing user bias and by quantifying aspects of behaviors that cannot be assessed by a human observer. Single mouse setups have been used routinely, but cannot be easily extended to multiple-animal studies where social behavior is key, e.g., autism, depression, anxiety, substance and non-substance addictive disorders, aggression, sexual behavior, or parenting. While recent efforts are focusing on multiple-animal tracking alone, a significant limitation remains the lack of insightful measures of social interactions. We present a novel, non-invasive single camera-based automated tracking method described as Mouse Social Test (MoST) and set of measures designed for estimating the interactions of multiple mice at the same time in the same environment interacting freely. Our results show measurement of social interactions and designed to be adaptable and applicable to most existing home cage systems used in research, and provide a greater level of detailed analysis of social behavior than previously possible. The present study describes social behaviors assessed in a home cage environment setup containing six mice that interact freely over long periods of time, and we illustrate how these measures can be interpreted and combined to classify rodent social behaviors. In addition, we illustrate how these measures can be interpreted and combined to classify and analyze comprehensively rodent behaviors involved in several neuropsychiatric diseases as well as provide opportunity for the basic research of rodent behavior previously not possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Actimetrics (2012) Actimetrics. http://actimetrics.com/

  • AG N (2012) NewBehavior. http://www.newbehavior.com

  • Aguiar P, Mendonca L (2007) OpenControl: a free opensource software for video tracking and automated control of behavioral mazes. J Neurosci Methods 166(1):66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Analysis IBI (2011) Icy Mice Profiler. http://icy.bioimageanalysis.org/

  • Antunes M, Biala G (2012) The novel object recognition memory: neurobiology, test procedure, and its modifications. Cogn Process 13(2):93–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aponte Y, Atasoy D et al (2011) AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training. Nat Neurosci 14(3):351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartal IB, Rodgers DA et al (2014) Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. eLife 3

  • Beery AK, Kaufer D (2015) Stress, social behavior, and resilience: insights from rodents. Neurobiol Stress 1:116–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benice TS, Raber J (2008) Object recognition analysis in mice using nose-point digital video tracking. J Neurosci Methods 168(2):422–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonasera SJ, Schenk AK et al (2008) A novel method for automatic quantification of psychostimulant-evoked route-tracing stereotypy: application to Mus musculus. Psychopharmacology 196(4):591–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branson K (2007) Tracking multiple mice through severe occlusions

  • Branson K, Belongie S (2005) Tracking multiple mouse contours (without too many samples). In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1, pp 1039–1046

  • Brodkin ES, Hagemann A et al (2004) Social approach-avoidance behavior of inbred mouse strains towards DBA/2 mice. Brain Res 1002(1–2):151–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesler EJ, Wilson SG et al (2002) Influences of laboratory environment on behavior. Nat Neurosci 5(11):1101–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Co S (2012) AnyMAZE. http://www.anymaze.com/index.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2014

  • Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D et al (1999) Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284(5420):1670–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley JN (1999) Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice: experimental design and evaluation of general health, sensory functions, motor abilities, and specific behavioral tests. Brain Res 835(1):18–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denmark A, Tien D et al (2010) The effects of chronic social defeat stress on mouse self-grooming behavior and its patterning. Behav Brain Res 208(2):553–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desland FA, Afzal A et al (2014) Manual versus automated rodent behavioral assessment: comparing efficacy and ease of Bederson and Garcia Neurological Deficit Scores to an open field video-tracking system. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 6:7–14

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1986) Odor-guided behavior in mammals. Experientia 42(3):257–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich DE, Rainnie DG (2015) Prenatal stress alters the development of socioemotional behavior and amygdala neuron excitability in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology

  • Eisenberg JF (1967) A comparative study in rodent ethology with emphasis on evolution of social behavior I. In: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, p 122

  • Ennaceur A, Delacour J (1988) A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 31(1):47–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson JN, Aldag JM et al (2001) Oxytocin in the medial amygdala is essential for social recognition in the mouse. J Neurosci 21(20):8278–8285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SP, Godinho SI et al (2012) Rapid assessment of sleep-wake behavior in mice. J Biol Rhythms 27(1):48–58

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forkosh O, Shemesh Y et al (2014) High-order social interactions in groups of mice. J Mol Neurosci 53:S46–S46

    Google Scholar 

  • Galsworthy MJ, Amrein I et al (2005) A comparison of wild-caught wood mice and bank voles in the Intellicage: assessing exploration, daily activity patterns and place learning paradigms. Behav Brain Res 157(2):211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould TD, Dao DT et al (2009) The open field test. Mood Anxiety Rel Phenotypes Mice Characterization Behav Tests 42:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inc CS (2012) CleverSys. http://cleversysinc.com

  • Jahng JW, Yoo SB et al (2012) Hyperphagia and depression-like behavior by adolescence social isolation in female rats. Int J Dev Neurosci 30(1):47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jhuang H, Garrote E et al (2010) Automated home-cage behavioural phenotyping of mice. Nat Commun 1:68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler KS, Greenspan RJ (2006) The nature of genetic influences on behavior: lessons from “simpler” organisms. Am J Psychiatry 163(10):1683–1694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kummer KK, Hofhansel L et al (2014) Differences in social interaction- vs. cocaine reward in mouse vs. rat. Front. Behav Neurosci 8:363

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas M, Toth I et al (2011) The neuropeptide oxytocin facilitates pro-social behavior and prevents social avoidance in rats and mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 36(11):2159–2168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marler P, Hamilton WJ (1966) Mechanisms of animal behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo N, Tanda K et al (2009) Comprehensive behavioral phenotyping of ryanodine receptor type 3 (RyR3) knockout mice: decreased social contact duration in two social interaction tests. Front Behav Neurosci 3:3

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miczek KA, Maxson SC et al (2001) Aggressive behavioral phenotypes in mice. Behav Brain Res 125(1–2):167–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mossman CA, Drickamer LC (1996) Odor preferences of female house mice (Mus domesticus) in seminatural enclosures. J Comp Psychol 110(2):131–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RJ, Chiavegatto S (2000) Aggression in knockout mice. ILAR J 41(3):153–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson IAS, Nevison CM et al (2003) Understanding behaviour: the relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. Appl Animal Behav Sci 81(3):245–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pack AI, Galante RJ et al (2007) Novel method for high-throughput phenotyping of sleep in mice. Physiol Genomics 28(2):232–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DT, Kuti OJ et al (2009) Computerized assessment of social approach behavior in mouse. Front Behav Neurosci 3:48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pistori H, Viana Aguiar Odakura VV et al (2010) Mice and larvae tracking using a particle filter with an auto-adjustable observation model. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(4):337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Publicover NG, Hayes LJ et al (2009) Video imaging system for automated shaping and analysis of complex locomotory behavior. J Neurosci Methods 182(1):34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Restif C, JOR, Pagiazitis J, Wang G, Volkow N, Thanos P, Metaxas D (2012) Tracking multiple mice interacting freely in open environments

  • Restrepo D, Arellano J et al (2004) Emerging views on the distinct but related roles of the main and accessory olfactory systems in responsiveness to chemosensory signals in mice. Horm Behav 46(3):247–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L, Riedel G (2014) Comparison of automated home-cage monitoring systems: emphasis on feeding behaviour, activity and spatial learning following pharmacological interventions. J Neurosci Methods 234:13–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schellinck HM, Smyth C et al (1993) Odor-induced sexual maturation and expression of c-fos in the olfactory system of juvenile female mice. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 74(1):138–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz D, Southekal S et al (2011) Simultaneous assessment of rodent behavior and neurochemistry using a miniature positron emission tomograph. Nat Methods 8(4):347–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spear LP (2000) The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24(4):417–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Technology NI (2012a) Noldus. http://www.noldus.com

  • Technology VB (2012b) ViewPoint. http://www.viewpoint.fr/en/home

  • Tzanoulinou S, Garcia-Mompo C et al (2014) Long-term behavioral programming induced by peripuberty stress in rats is accompanied by GABAergic-related alterations in the amygdala. PLoS One 9(4)

  • Valzelli L, Bernasconi S et al (1974) Effect of isolation on some behavioral characteristics in 3 strains of mice. Biol Psychiatry 9(3):329–334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten D, Rustay NR et al (2003) In search of a better mouse test. Trends Neurosci 26(3):132–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wongwitdecha N, Marsden CA (1996) Social isolation increases aggressive behaviour and alters the effects of diazepam in the rat social interaction test. Behav Brain Res 75(1–2):27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurn JB, Jiang XH et al (2007) Video-based tracking and incremental learning applied to rodent behavioral activity under near-infrared illumination. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 56(6):2804–2813

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panayotis K. Thanos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thanos, P.K., Restif, C., O’Rourke, J.R. et al. Mouse Social Interaction Test (MoST): a quantitative computer automated analysis of behavior. J Neural Transm 124, 3–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-015-1487-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-015-1487-0

Keywords

Navigation