Abstract
Rodents are the most commonly used preclinical model of human disease assessing the mechanism(s) involved as well as the role of genetics, epigenetics, and pharmacotherapy on this disease as well as identifying vulnerability factors and risk assessment for disease critical in the development of improved treatment strategies. Unfortunately, the majority of rodent preclinical studies utilize single housed approaches where animals are either entirely housed and tested in solitary environments or group housed but tested in solitary environments. This approach, however, ignores the important contribution of social interaction and social behavior. Social interaction in rodents is found to be a major criterion for the ethological validity of rodent species-specific behavioral characteristics (Zurn et al. 2007; Analysis 2011). It is also well established that there is significant and growing number of reports, which illustrates the important role of social environment and social interaction in all diseases, with particularly significance in all neuropsychiatric diseases. Thus, it is imperative that research studies be able to add large-scale evaluations of social interaction and behavior in mice and benefit from automated tracking of behaviors and measurements by removing user bias and by quantifying aspects of behaviors that cannot be assessed by a human observer. Single mouse setups have been used routinely, but cannot be easily extended to multiple-animal studies where social behavior is key, e.g., autism, depression, anxiety, substance and non-substance addictive disorders, aggression, sexual behavior, or parenting. While recent efforts are focusing on multiple-animal tracking alone, a significant limitation remains the lack of insightful measures of social interactions. We present a novel, non-invasive single camera-based automated tracking method described as Mouse Social Test (MoST) and set of measures designed for estimating the interactions of multiple mice at the same time in the same environment interacting freely. Our results show measurement of social interactions and designed to be adaptable and applicable to most existing home cage systems used in research, and provide a greater level of detailed analysis of social behavior than previously possible. The present study describes social behaviors assessed in a home cage environment setup containing six mice that interact freely over long periods of time, and we illustrate how these measures can be interpreted and combined to classify rodent social behaviors. In addition, we illustrate how these measures can be interpreted and combined to classify and analyze comprehensively rodent behaviors involved in several neuropsychiatric diseases as well as provide opportunity for the basic research of rodent behavior previously not possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Actimetrics (2012) Actimetrics. http://actimetrics.com/
AG N (2012) NewBehavior. http://www.newbehavior.com
Aguiar P, Mendonca L (2007) OpenControl: a free opensource software for video tracking and automated control of behavioral mazes. J Neurosci Methods 166(1):66–72
Analysis IBI (2011) Icy Mice Profiler. http://icy.bioimageanalysis.org/
Antunes M, Biala G (2012) The novel object recognition memory: neurobiology, test procedure, and its modifications. Cogn Process 13(2):93–110
Aponte Y, Atasoy D et al (2011) AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training. Nat Neurosci 14(3):351–355
Bartal IB, Rodgers DA et al (2014) Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. eLife 3
Beery AK, Kaufer D (2015) Stress, social behavior, and resilience: insights from rodents. Neurobiol Stress 1:116–127
Benice TS, Raber J (2008) Object recognition analysis in mice using nose-point digital video tracking. J Neurosci Methods 168(2):422–430
Bonasera SJ, Schenk AK et al (2008) A novel method for automatic quantification of psychostimulant-evoked route-tracing stereotypy: application to Mus musculus. Psychopharmacology 196(4):591–602
Branson K (2007) Tracking multiple mice through severe occlusions
Branson K, Belongie S (2005) Tracking multiple mouse contours (without too many samples). In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1, pp 1039–1046
Brodkin ES, Hagemann A et al (2004) Social approach-avoidance behavior of inbred mouse strains towards DBA/2 mice. Brain Res 1002(1–2):151–157
Chesler EJ, Wilson SG et al (2002) Influences of laboratory environment on behavior. Nat Neurosci 5(11):1101–1102
Co S (2012) AnyMAZE. http://www.anymaze.com/index.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D et al (1999) Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284(5420):1670–1672
Crawley JN (1999) Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice: experimental design and evaluation of general health, sensory functions, motor abilities, and specific behavioral tests. Brain Res 835(1):18–26
Denmark A, Tien D et al (2010) The effects of chronic social defeat stress on mouse self-grooming behavior and its patterning. Behav Brain Res 208(2):553–559
Desland FA, Afzal A et al (2014) Manual versus automated rodent behavioral assessment: comparing efficacy and ease of Bederson and Garcia Neurological Deficit Scores to an open field video-tracking system. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 6:7–14
Doty RL (1986) Odor-guided behavior in mammals. Experientia 42(3):257–271
Ehrlich DE, Rainnie DG (2015) Prenatal stress alters the development of socioemotional behavior and amygdala neuron excitability in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology
Eisenberg JF (1967) A comparative study in rodent ethology with emphasis on evolution of social behavior I. In: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, p 122
Ennaceur A, Delacour J (1988) A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 31(1):47–59
Ferguson JN, Aldag JM et al (2001) Oxytocin in the medial amygdala is essential for social recognition in the mouse. J Neurosci 21(20):8278–8285
Fisher SP, Godinho SI et al (2012) Rapid assessment of sleep-wake behavior in mice. J Biol Rhythms 27(1):48–58
Forkosh O, Shemesh Y et al (2014) High-order social interactions in groups of mice. J Mol Neurosci 53:S46–S46
Galsworthy MJ, Amrein I et al (2005) A comparison of wild-caught wood mice and bank voles in the Intellicage: assessing exploration, daily activity patterns and place learning paradigms. Behav Brain Res 157(2):211–217
Gould TD, Dao DT et al (2009) The open field test. Mood Anxiety Rel Phenotypes Mice Characterization Behav Tests 42:1–20
Inc CS (2012) CleverSys. http://cleversysinc.com
Jahng JW, Yoo SB et al (2012) Hyperphagia and depression-like behavior by adolescence social isolation in female rats. Int J Dev Neurosci 30(1):47–53
Jhuang H, Garrote E et al (2010) Automated home-cage behavioural phenotyping of mice. Nat Commun 1:68
Kendler KS, Greenspan RJ (2006) The nature of genetic influences on behavior: lessons from “simpler” organisms. Am J Psychiatry 163(10):1683–1694
Kummer KK, Hofhansel L et al (2014) Differences in social interaction- vs. cocaine reward in mouse vs. rat. Front. Behav Neurosci 8:363
Lukas M, Toth I et al (2011) The neuropeptide oxytocin facilitates pro-social behavior and prevents social avoidance in rats and mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 36(11):2159–2168
Marler P, Hamilton WJ (1966) Mechanisms of animal behavior. Wiley, New York
Matsuo N, Tanda K et al (2009) Comprehensive behavioral phenotyping of ryanodine receptor type 3 (RyR3) knockout mice: decreased social contact duration in two social interaction tests. Front Behav Neurosci 3:3
Miczek KA, Maxson SC et al (2001) Aggressive behavioral phenotypes in mice. Behav Brain Res 125(1–2):167–181
Mossman CA, Drickamer LC (1996) Odor preferences of female house mice (Mus domesticus) in seminatural enclosures. J Comp Psychol 110(2):131–138
Nelson RJ, Chiavegatto S (2000) Aggression in knockout mice. ILAR J 41(3):153–162
Olsson IAS, Nevison CM et al (2003) Understanding behaviour: the relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. Appl Animal Behav Sci 81(3):245–264
Pack AI, Galante RJ et al (2007) Novel method for high-throughput phenotyping of sleep in mice. Physiol Genomics 28(2):232–238
Page DT, Kuti OJ et al (2009) Computerized assessment of social approach behavior in mouse. Front Behav Neurosci 3:48
Pistori H, Viana Aguiar Odakura VV et al (2010) Mice and larvae tracking using a particle filter with an auto-adjustable observation model. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(4):337–346
Publicover NG, Hayes LJ et al (2009) Video imaging system for automated shaping and analysis of complex locomotory behavior. J Neurosci Methods 182(1):34–42
Restif C, JOR, Pagiazitis J, Wang G, Volkow N, Thanos P, Metaxas D (2012) Tracking multiple mice interacting freely in open environments
Restrepo D, Arellano J et al (2004) Emerging views on the distinct but related roles of the main and accessory olfactory systems in responsiveness to chemosensory signals in mice. Horm Behav 46(3):247–256
Robinson L, Riedel G (2014) Comparison of automated home-cage monitoring systems: emphasis on feeding behaviour, activity and spatial learning following pharmacological interventions. J Neurosci Methods 234:13–25
Schellinck HM, Smyth C et al (1993) Odor-induced sexual maturation and expression of c-fos in the olfactory system of juvenile female mice. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 74(1):138–141
Schulz D, Southekal S et al (2011) Simultaneous assessment of rodent behavior and neurochemistry using a miniature positron emission tomograph. Nat Methods 8(4):347–352
Spear LP (2000) The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24(4):417–463
Technology NI (2012a) Noldus. http://www.noldus.com
Technology VB (2012b) ViewPoint. http://www.viewpoint.fr/en/home
Tzanoulinou S, Garcia-Mompo C et al (2014) Long-term behavioral programming induced by peripuberty stress in rats is accompanied by GABAergic-related alterations in the amygdala. PLoS One 9(4)
Valzelli L, Bernasconi S et al (1974) Effect of isolation on some behavioral characteristics in 3 strains of mice. Biol Psychiatry 9(3):329–334
Wahlsten D, Rustay NR et al (2003) In search of a better mouse test. Trends Neurosci 26(3):132–136
Wongwitdecha N, Marsden CA (1996) Social isolation increases aggressive behaviour and alters the effects of diazepam in the rat social interaction test. Behav Brain Res 75(1–2):27–32
Zurn JB, Jiang XH et al (2007) Video-based tracking and incremental learning applied to rodent behavioral activity under near-infrared illumination. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 56(6):2804–2813
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thanos, P.K., Restif, C., O’Rourke, J.R. et al. Mouse Social Interaction Test (MoST): a quantitative computer automated analysis of behavior. J Neural Transm 124, 3–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-015-1487-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-015-1487-0