Abstract
With the continuing improvements in implants for distal humerus fractures, it is expected that newer types of plates, which are anatomically precontoured, thinner and less irritating to soft tissue, would have comparable outcomes when used in a clinical study. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with distal humerus fractures who were treated with orthogonal and parallel plating methods using precontoured distal humerus plates. Sixty-seven patients with a mean age of 55.4 years (range 22–90 years) were included in this prospective study. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 treatments: orthogonal or parallel plating. The following results were assessed: operating time, time to fracture union, presence of a step or gap at the articular margin, varus–valgus angulation, functional recovery, and complications. No intergroup differences were observed based on radiological and clinical results between the groups. In our practice, no significant differences were found between the orthogonal and parallel plating methods in terms of clinical outcomes, mean operation time, union time, or complication rates. There were no cases of fracture nonunion in either group; heterotrophic ossification was found 3 patients in orthogonal plating group and 2 patients in parallel plating group. In our practice, no significant differences were found between the orthogonal and parallel plating methods in terms of clinical outcomes or complication rates. However, orthogonal plating method may be preferred in cases of coronal shear fractures, where posterior to anterior fixation may provide additional stability to the intraarticular fractures. Additionally, parallel plating method may be the preferred technique used for fractures that occur at the most distal end of the humerus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jacobson SR, Glisson RR, Urbaniak JR (1997) Comparison of distal humerus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. J South Orthop Assoc 6:241–249
Self J, Viegas SF, Buford WL Jr, Patterson RM (1995) A comparison of double-plate fixation methods for complex distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:10–16
Ring D, Jupiter JB (2000) Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthop Clin North Am 31:103–113
Hausman M, Panozzo A (2004) Treatment of distal humerus fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:55–63
Schemitsch EH, Tencer AF, Henley MB (1994) Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 8:468–475
Zalavras CG, Vercillo MT, Jun BJ, Otarodifard K, Itamura JM, Lee TQ (2011) Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:12–20
Arnander MW, Reeves A, MacLeod IA, Pinto TM, Khaleel A (2008) A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22:332–336
Kollias CM, Darcy SP, Reed JG, Rosvold JM, Shrive NG, Hildebrand KA (2010) Distal humerus internal fixation: a biomechanical comparison of 90° and parallel constructs. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:440–444
Windolf M, Maza ER, Gueorguiev B, Braunstein V, Schwieger K (2010) Treatment of distal humeral fractures using conventional implants. Biomechanical evaluation of a new implant configuration. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:172
Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH (2010) A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:2–9
Abzug JM, Dantuluri PK (2010) Use of orthogonal or parallel plating techniques to treat distal humerus fractures. Hand Clin 26:411–421
Vennettilli M, Athwal GS (2012) Parallel versus orthogonal plating for distal humerus fractures. J Hand Surg Am 37:819–820
Schuster I, Korner J, Arzdorf M, Schwieger K, Diederichs G, Linke B (2008) Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities. J Orthop Trauma 22:113–120
Reising K, Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Suedkamp NP (2009) Stabilisation of articular fractures of the distal humerus: early experience with a novel perpendicular plate system. Injury 40:611–617
Celli A, Donini MT, Minervini C (2008) The use of pre-contoured plates in the treatment of C2–C3 fractures of the distal humerus: clinical experience. Chir Organi Mov 91:57–64
O’Driscoll SW (2005) Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:186S–194S
Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G (2008) Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res 26:778–784
Schwartz A, Oka R, Odell T, Mahar A (2006) Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures. Clin Biomech 21:950–955
Got C, Shuck J, Biercevicz A, Paller D, Mulcahey M, Zimmermann M, Blaine T, Green A (2012) Biomechanical comparison of parallel versus 90–90 plating of bicolumn distal humerus fractures with intra-articular comminution. J Hand Surg Am 37:2512–2518
Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audige L (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21:S1–S133
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:453–458
Bucholz RW, Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, Tornetta P (2010) Distal humerus fractures. In: Athwal GS (ed) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 945–998
Hastings H, Graham TJ (1994) The classification and treatment of heterotopic ossification about the elbow and forearm. Hand Clin 10:417–437
Reips UD, Funke F (2008) Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator. Behav Res Methods 40:699–704
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608
Morrey BF, An KN (2000) Functional evaluation of the elbow. In: Morrey BF (ed) The elbow and its disorders, 3rd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, p 82
Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Gofton WT, Macdermid JC, Patterson SD, Faber KJ, King GJ (2003) Functional outcome of AO type C distal humeral fractures. J Hand Surg Am 28:294–308
Eralp L, Kocaoglu M, Sar C, Atalar AC (2001) Surgical treatment of distal intraarticular humeral fractures in adults. Int Orthop 25:46–50
Kundel K, Braun W, Wieberneit J, Ruter A (1996) Intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Factors affecting functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 332:200–208
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S.K., Kim, K.J., Park, K.H. et al. A comparison between orthogonal and parallel plating methods for distal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1123–1131 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1286-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1286-y