Disc herniations in astronauts: What causes them, and what does it tell us about herniation on earth?
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Belavy, D.L., Adams, M., Brisby, H. et al. Eur Spine J (2016) 25: 144. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3917-y
Recent work showed an increased risk of cervical and lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) herniations in astronauts. The European Space Agency asked the authors to advise on the underlying pathophysiology of this increased risk, to identify predisposing factors and possible interventions and to suggest research priorities.
The authors performed a narrative literature review of the possible mechanisms, and conducted a survey within the team to prioritize research and prevention approaches.
Results and conclusions
Based on literature review the most likely cause for lumbar IVD herniations was concluded to be swelling of the IVD in the unloaded condition during spaceflight. For the cervical IVDs, the knowledge base is too limited to postulate a likely mechanism or recommend approaches for prevention. Basic research on the impact of (un)loading on the cervical IVD and translational research is needed. The highest priority prevention approach for the lumbar spine was post-flight care avoiding activities involving spinal flexion, followed by passive spinal loading in spaceflight and exercises to reduce IVD hyper-hydration post-flight.
KeywordsProlapse Atrophy Back pain Muscle Inactivity Bed rest
The problem: disc herniations in astronauts
The European Space Agency (ESA) asked the authors to advise on why this higher rate of IVD herniations occurs in astronauts and what could be done about it. The main question is not why astronauts get herniations but rather: Why do they get more than the general population? How come this increase persists often months after the spaceflight is over? Also, why do so many herniations affect the cervical spine? An additional question of interest is: What does the astronaut experience tell us about IVD herniation in the normal population? The current paper reports on our literature review, discussions, conclusions and suggestions for future work.
What are the likely mechanisms?
Increase in lumbar disc hydration as a result of reduced spinal loads in space
In our opinion, the most probable mechanism, at least for the lumbar spine, is swelling of the IVD in the unloaded condition during spaceflight. The overhydrated disc is then vulnerable to an IVD herniation, especially when the pressures on the lumbar spine are increased under flexion during or immediately after spaceflight. This mechanism is supported by mechanical experiments on cadaveric and animal spines which have shown that severe loading in combined bending and compression can cause apparently normal lumbar IVDs to herniate [2, 3], and that herniation is more likely when the IVDs are fully hydrated .
Mechanisms for the cervical spine unclear: basic research is needed
For the cervical spine little data on possible herniation mechanisms are available. There are no published data from astronauts on changes in the cervical IVDs during spaceflight and while spinal length does increase during spaceflight [5, 6], it is not clear which spinal region contributes to this lengthening. Data from studies on Earth show that some degree of cervical spine lengthening occurs with recumbency [26, 27]. There are a number of differences between cervical and lumbar discs: in composition , anatomy  and biomechanical characteristics . However, these data do not help us understand why the risk of IVD herniation is much more elevated at the cervical spine than at the lumbar spine in astronauts. Overall, a mechanism of increased cervical IVD injury risk due to increased IVD size and hydration may be possible, but there are no published data available to substantiate this hypothesis. Basic research on the cervical IVDs is needed.
Muscle weakness and/or dysfunction may lead to risk of injury and may also predispose to herniation. It has been established that muscle atrophy occurs around the lumbar spine during spaceflight . Data from bed rest on Earth suggest that the time course of lumbar muscle size recovery [14, 16, 32, 33] and the recovery of lumbar extension torque  is within “weeks” after bed rest. However, muscle function, as measured by superficial electromyography recordings [34, 35], may take “months” to recover. Overall, lumbar muscle weakness and dysfunction may well contribute to initial risk and may present an increased injury risk for weeks to months. Furthermore, on the basis of data on the (disturbed) control of posture after spaceflight [36, 37], it is reasonable to assume that altered sensorimotor control after spaceflight may lead to decreased protection of the IVD by the muscular system.
At the cervical spine, the (neuro)muscular adaptation is much less clear, again due to a paucity of data. What we do know is that no atrophy of the cervical extensor muscles was seen in nine astronauts measured after spaceflight . Data from studies of neck pain suggest that the deep cervical extensors  and deep cervical flexors  may be important for protecting the spine, yet muscle groups such as these have not been examined in astronauts in any detail. In prolonged bed rest, hypertrophy of most of the cervical muscles was seen , but as argued in that publication, prolonged bed rest might not be a good model for the effects of spaceflight on the cervical spine region. Further data are required on the response of the cervical spine musculature to weightlessness.
Cumulative injury to the IVD prior to spaceflight
The increased IVD herniation incidence in astronauts could result from cumulative IVD injury occurring prior to the spaceflights. Johnston et al.  observed an increased risk of IVD herniation upon entering the astronaut program. This could potentially be due to pre-existing conditions or the training program itself.
Since a number of astronauts had previously been fighter pilots, Johnston et al.  evaluated whether this prior history may be a predictive factor for IVD herniation, but they did not find any significant relationship. Performing high-G manoeuvres , pilot ejection , and helicopter vibration  present risk factors for injury to the neck. Potentially, the resulting high-compressive forces on the spine could result in end plate fractures, then leading to adjacent IVD degeneration . Alternatively, the IVD injuries could have occurred whilst astronauts were still fighter pilots and that the injuries were only picked up as part of medical management once they entered the astronaut program. However, the longitudinal data available  and meta-analysis of cross-sectional data  suggest that the majority of degenerative changes in the IVDs of fighter pilots are due to normal ageing and not the fighter pilot occupation per se.
Furthermore, the astronaut selection process might “select” people at higher risk of IVD problems. For example, in the Finnish Air Force, one of the selection criteria for fighter pilots is peak power on a cycling ergometry test. Experience (unpublished observations; R. Sovelius) has been that applicants who are weightlifters or ice-hockey players typically perform better on these tests. Weightlifters typically show more degenerative IVD changes . It could be that persons selected for astronaut training, due to their previous sporting pursuits, are at risk for IVD problems.
Long-term effect of spaceflight on spinal tissues
Spaceflights may have an effect on IVD physiology and, in the long run, possibly also have an impact on the rate of IVD degeneration. This may thereby have an influence on medium to long-term IVD injury risk. Animal models investigating the IVD in spaceflight [48, 49], hindlimb suspension [50–53] and tail vertebra immobilisation [54, 55] have typically [48–53, 55], but not always , found losses in glycosaminoglycan content. However, the extent to which animal models can be used as a model of human IVD changes in spaceflight remains an open question . It is also unclear to what extent such changes in IVD composition occur in humans in unloading, and further if and how any such changes affect the herniation risk. In vitro work has shown that both glycosaminoglycan synthesis rates fall [57–59] and production of proteases is able to degrade the IVD increases  with the decrease in osmolarity arising from IVD swelling. Such changes in cellular activity could be responsible for the loss of glycosaminoglycans seen in fast-metabolising small animal IVDs. However, in the much larger and relatively acellular human IVDs, the half-life of the proteoglycan aggrecan, a major component of the IVD matrix and responsible for regulating IVD swelling pressure , is around 12 years for normal IVDs and 8 years for degenerate IVDs . Hence, spaceflight appears too short for such changes in cellular activity to influence human IVD composition noticeably, at least during the period when susceptibility to herniation is increased.
Essentially nothing is known about the adaptation of the spinal ligamentous system to weightlessness. IVD swelling increases tension in the intervertebral ligaments, so that they may provide greater resistance to spinal flexion [4, 66]. Increased ligament tension would increase IVD compression, especially when the spine is flexed, and this could increase the risk of IVD herniations due to spaceflight. The role of the spinal ligaments in bending moments  or in proprioceptive function may be disturbed after spaceflight, but data to support this are lacking.
How can we best improve our understanding of the problem?
The European Space Agency requested advice on research priorities to better understand the issue of IVD herniations in astronauts. In our discussions, some specific research questions were suggested and in other instances, general research approaches aimed at increasing our knowledge, albeit without a specific hypothesis, were put forward. Each of these had their scientific merit and each of them had differing levels of difficulty of implementation, financial cost and time cost. Research ideas were ranked by the authors and those gained wider support within the team were:
Using existing astronaut data Other data from astronaut medical records (e.g. body height) may give insight into spinal adaptation after spaceflight. Also, gaining more detailed information on the existing IVD herniation events (e.g. which vertebral level, location of the herniation, time of day of herniation, etc.) would be insightful. Although these data will likely be exhausted quickly, we consider it prudent to examine such data before planning new experiments.
Gaining basic information on the cervical spine A common theme in our discussions and review of the literature was that we lack even basic information on the impact of spaceflight on the cervical spine. For basic clinical, biomechanical and physiological sciences, research has been done mostly on the lumbar spine, and much less on the cervical spine. Topics could include examining diurnal variation in the cervical discs, understanding changes in neck musculature in spaceflight, and understanding loading patterns that cause cervical disc herniation.
Better understanding lumbar IVD diurnal changes Diurnal variation in the lumbar IVDs may be altered after spaceflight and more data on this will improve our understanding of lumbar IVD herniation risk after spaceflight. Also, using diurnal variation of lumbar IVDs is probably a useful model to understand the likely effects of spaceflight on the lumbar spine.
Minor modification of medical data collection in astronauts This could help to answer questions without doing complex studies. For example, consistent data collection on body height with standard equipment and information on body shape would be of use. Of course, any additional time taken from an astronaut’s schedule will be seen critically by mission organisers, so this may be a limiting factor.
Assessing astronauts that have already flown Depending on research question, this could be a comparatively low-cost method to test certain hypotheses without the efforts or cost of a spaceflight or an Earth-bound bed rest study. There are some practical impediments to this strategy, such as gaining access to the ex-astronauts, but it is nonetheless possible.
Larger modification of medical data collection in astronauts For example, is it possible to consider a whole-body magnetic resonance imaging scan pre- and post-flight? With, for example, three-dimensional sequences any plane of the body can be reconstructed to enable researchers to examine the body plane of interest. No matter how useful the data may be, the administrative and scheduling challenges of implementing new standard medical examinations will present a limiting factor.
There were other ideas that gained some support within the team. These represent lower priority options that could be targeted once the primary approaches are exhausted.
Understanding which loading protocols help to prevent IVD changes with unloading The available bed rest data on the impact of exercise in bed rest on the lumbar discs has been summarised in earlier work , but there are a number of open questions for the lumbar spine with a complete lack of information for the cervical spine.
Understanding changes at the vertebral end plate It is unclear how spaceflight and spine unloading might distort or affect the function of the end plate (see also Fig. 7).
Understanding changes in (eccentric) muscle function and sensorimotor control A better understanding of changes in muscle function will help us to guide rehabilitation processes better. Proprioception and motor processing are impacted in microgravity . Similar to muscle function, the controller of motor output could play a role in preventing injury to the spine and a better understanding of this system is warranted.
Understanding why the lumbar IVDs remain larger for some time after spaceflight simulation (bed rest) Earlier findings have indicated that the lumbar IVDs remain larger than baseline levels some weeks or months after bed rest. It may be relevant to injury risk to understand why this effect occurs.
Understanding what impact changing exercise devices on the ISS has had A new “advanced resistive exercise device” has been put in use on the International Space Station. This research question asks what impact, if any, the new higher load device had on back pain and IVD injury risk post-flight.
What can we do to reduce the incidence of IVD herniations in astronauts?
One of the key issues is because our knowledge of the cervical spine is so limited, it is impossible to provide any recommendations for countermeasures against cervical IVD herniation without some basic spaceflight-related and clinical research.
In general: avoid spinal flexion and compression activities. This includes care with daily tasks, such as when putting ones socks on, and also use of devices to assist in activities to avoid such positions.
Spend more time in lying in the days after flight.
Consider some kind of orthosis or taping for the lumbar spine, and for the cervical spine a neck collar.
After flight: walking around gently, but otherwise further research is required on what kinds of exercise protocols are better for loading the disc when it is hyper-hydrated.
The duration for which such “care with spinal flexion activities” protocols should be implemented should last for a few weeks. However, further work is needed to better define this time frame.
As increase in disc hydration in space appears to be the major risk factor in the lumbar spine at least, mechanisms which attempt to counteract such changes could potentially lower herniation risk. Passive spinal loading throughout spaceflight using, for example, the “skinsuit”  could reduce IVD changes in-flight through continual loading of the spine. However, such compression suits can be, according to anecdotal reports, uncomfortable and compliance will need to be considered. Exercise approaches may also reduce (lumbar) IVD hyper-hydration and size. Currently the “fetal tuck” position is used by astronauts to relieve low back pain in spaceflight , caution should be applied when considering this as a standard countermeasure: this kind of spinal loading differs from the normal functional loading patterns of the spine. We suggest that axial loading of the spine in a neutral posture would be better. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to optimise the training programs on exercise devices on the ISS to avoid inappropriate loading and to consider post-flight exercise with partial unloading.
What can astronaut IVD herniations tell us about herniations in the normal population?
Astronauts are not a very large population, whereas IVD herniations in Earth-bound populations are an important and common diagnosis causing substantial disability. The astronaut data highlight risk factors for IVD herniation in the general population, specifically that risk of herniation likely varies with time of day, with risks possibly highest in the morning after waking from an overnight rest. Whilst there have been no direct studies on diurnal variation in incidence of herniation, there are data on back pain. One study on acute-onset low back pain  noted that, of those individuals who could recall when pain onset started, 46 % of these reported pain beginning between 8 a.m. and midday. Another study in hospital employees  reported that the mean time of day for low back injury was in the morning. Similarly a study  reported the highest rates of back injury in the “day shift” (7 a.m.–4 p.m.), but did not differentiate the time of the day any further. Finally, a crossover design intervention study  in people with recurrent low back pain showed that instruction to control spinal flexion activities in the early morning reduced number of days with pain, pain intensity and medication use.
Overall, the data from astronauts and bed rest support the idea that diurnal changes in the spine do influence injury risk in Earth-bound populations and suggest modalities for reducing these risks. The ideas are equally applicable to individuals subject to bed rest for medical reasons (e.g. post-surgery, or prolonged care in an intensive care unit). Furthermore, the findings also help to highlight risk window periods for activities such as heavy lifting and spine flexion.
The issue of IVD herniations in astronauts also highlights the role of mechanical loading in IVD herniation in general. Although we cannot rule out an impact of spaceflight on medium to long-term IVD degeneration post-flight in the relatively short duration of a spaceflight the IVD is not likely to degenerate. Thus, the spike of IVD herniation incidence observed by Johnston et al.  immediately after spaceflight emphasises the mechanics of internal IVD forces and influence of external forces on IVD herniation.
In conclusion, the current review examined available data trying to define reasons why astronauts are at a higher risk for IVD herniations. For the lumbar IVD, the most likely contributing factor is swelling of the IVDs under weightlessness. However, for the cervical IVDs, the database is so limited that we cannot postulate a likely mechanism or recommend approaches for prevention. Basic research on the cervical spine, such as the impact of spaceflight and simulation (e.g. diurnal variation) as well as basic clinical, biomechanical and physiological research on the cervical IVDs is required. To better understand the problem of IVD herniations in astronauts we further advise focussing first on using existing astronaut data and assessing astronauts that have already flown in case–control studies. Further suggestions include: modification of medical data collection within the realms possible within space agencies and examining diurnal lumbar IVD variation both in astronauts after spaceflight as well as validated ground-based models. In the Earth-bound population, the current work highlights the potential impact of diurnal variation on IVD injury risk and also the role of mechanical loading of the IVD for the risk of experiencing herniations in general.
We thank our colleagues at the European Space Agency, Dr. Oliver Angerer and Dr. Jennifer Ngo-An, for facilitating our discussions. DLB thanks Dr. Zully Ritter for assistance in generating Fig. 2. We acknowledge the assistance of our colleagues at the European Astronaut Centre for clarifying our questions regarding astronaut training and care. The “European Space Agency Topical Team: Intervertebral Disc Herniations in Astronauts” was supported by contract number 4000110441/14/NL/PG from the European Space Agency. ARH was supported by NASA grant NNX13AM89G.
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.