Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal for splenectomy-omitting radical distal pancreatectomy in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: multicenter survey study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background

When distal pancreatectomy is carried out for left-sided pancreatic cancer, splenectomy is usually performed not only for margin-negative resection but also for effective clearance of the splenic hilar lymph nodes (LNs). However, the incidence of splenic hilar LN metastasis in these patients has not been definitively determined.

Methods

From April 2010 to June 2011, in a pilot study, we analyzed the medical records of twelve patients who had undergone radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Potential remnant soft tissue around the splenic hilum, which would be left following an extended Warshaw’s procedure, was dissected and sent to a pathologist. Three Japanese medical centers conducted a retrospective survey of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis in left-sided pancreatic cancer to support our study.

Results

In the pilot study, all twelve patients had adenocarcinoma with a median tumor size of 2 cm. Six patients had LN metastasis and a median number of 4 splenic hilar LNs were evaluated; however, no splenic hilar LN metastasis was noted. In the Japanese multicenter survey (n = 85), only four patients had splenic LN metastasis. Small (<3 cm) and proximal (neck/body) left-sided pancreatic cancer might not be associated with splenic hilar LN metastasis (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer, the incidence of splenic hilar LN metastasis is low enough that splenectomy-omitting radical distal pancreatectomy would be feasible. The rationale for routine splenectomy should be re-evaluated, and the oncologic effects of the preserved spleen need to be investigated further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crippa S, Bassi C, Warshaw AL, Falconi M, Partelli S, Thayer SP, et al. Middle pancreatectomy: indications, short- and long-term operative outcomes. Ann Surg. 2007;246:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Warshaw AL. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 1988;123:550–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim DH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Lee WJ, Chi HS. “Extended” distal pancreatectomy with segmental resection of both splenic vessels; extended Warshaw’s procedure. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2010;14:248–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Choi SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Yoon CI, Lee WJ. Pylorus- and spleen-preserving total pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of both whole splenic vessels: feasibility and laparoscopic application to intraductal papillary mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2072–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:244–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 2003;133:521–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM. Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujita T, Nakagohri T, Gotohda N, Takahashi S, Konishi M, Kojima M, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic factors and significance of lymph node status in invasive ductal carcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2010;39:e48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakao A, Harada A, Nonami T, Kaneko T, Nomoto S, Koyama H, et al. Lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1090–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, Redaelli CA, Schmied B, Uhl W, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection—long term results. Br J Surg. 2005;92:547–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tran KTC, Smeenk HG, Van Eijck CHJ, Kazemier G, Hop WC, Greve JWG, et al. Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg. 2004;240:738–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerdes B, Ramaswamy A, Bartsch DK, Rothmund M. Peripyloric lymph node metastasis is a rare condition in carcinoma of the pancreatic head. Pancreas. 2005;31:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogata Y, Hishinuma S. The impact of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy on surgical treatment for cancer of the pancreatic head. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:223–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;245:187–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iqbal N, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Abraham AT, Bhattacharya S, Tekkis PP, et al. A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2822 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:1237–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2005;138:618–28; discussion 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg. 1998;228:508–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg. 2002;236:355–66; discussion 66–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DH, Klimstra D, Conlon KC. The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137:164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Griffith JP, Sue-Ling HM, Martin I, Dixon MF, McMahon MJ, Axon AT, et al. Preservation of the spleen improves survival after radical surgery for gastric cancer. Gut. 1995;36:684–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis CJ, Ilstrup DM, Pemberton JH. Influence of splenectomy on survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1988;155:173–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwarz RE, Harrison LE, Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. The impact of splenectomy on outcomes after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:516–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Higashijima J, Shimada M, Chikakiyo M, Miyatani T, Yoshikawa K, Nishioka M, et al. Effect of splenectomy on antitumor immune system in mice. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:385–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Imai S, Nio Y, Shiraishi T, Tsubono M, Morimoto H, Tseng CC, et al. Effects of splenectomy on pulmonary metastasis and growth of SC42 carcinoma transplanted into mouse liver. J Surg Oncol. 1991;47:178–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiratori Y, Kawase T, Nakata R, Tanaka M, Hikiba Y, Okano K, et al. Effect of splenectomy on hepatic metastasis of colon carcinoma and natural killer activity in the liver. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:2398–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Moo Kang.

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S.H., Kang, C.M., Satoi, S. et al. Proposal for splenectomy-omitting radical distal pancreatectomy in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: multicenter survey study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20, 375–381 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0549-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0549-z

Keywords

Navigation