Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Education for cancer-related fatigue: could talking about it make people more likely to report it?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Education-based interventions for cancer-related fatigue have shown promise in adults undergoing radiotherapy. Research on the cancer-related fatigue intervention trial (CAN-FIT) programme found that pre-radiotherapy fatigue information and support (pre-RFES) did not improve levels of fatigue, but was associated with improvements in activity-based outcomes. We aimed to measure whether pre-RFES resulted in greater participant self-ratings of their performance of daily living activities, fatigue, quality of life and distress.

Methods

Thirty people undergoing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were randomly allocated to either a 1-h RFES session from the CAN-FIT programme (delivered individually to participants and modified where necessary for patients undergoing chemotherapy) or standard care. Measures were taken pre- and post-treatment and 6 weeks after completing treatment.

Results

There was no significant difference between groups on performance of daily living activities or ratings of distress. Further analysis found a significant difference between the control and treatment groups for EQ-5D health state visual analogue scale (−9.05 [−18.09; −0.018]; p < 0.05) and physical fatigue (2.86 [0.58; 5.14]; p < 0.02) with the treatment group rating their overall health state worse and their physical fatigue higher than the controls.

Conclusions

Pre-RFES delivered individually did not significantly improve participants’ ratings of their performance of daily occupations and was unexpectedly associated with worse overall health state and higher physical fatigue. Future trials, ideally comparing individual and group education to exercise programmes or cognitive–behavioural approaches, are recommended to examine the broader question of whether discussing fatigue might actually make participants feel worse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hofman M et al (2007) Cancer-related fatigue: the scale of the problem. Oncologist 12(Supplement 1):4–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Purcell A et al (2010) A multidimensional examination of correlates of fatigue during radiotherapy. Cancer 116(2):529–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow E et al (2008) Symptom clusters in cancer patients with brain metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 20(1):76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hickok JT et al (2005) Occurrence, severity, and longitudinal course of twelve common symptoms in 1129 consecutive patients during radiotherapy for cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 30(5):433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F (2005) The experience of fatigue, other symptoms and global quality of life during radiotherapy for uterine cancer. Int J Nurs Stud 42(4):377–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Jong N et al (2002) Fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a review of the literature. Cancer Nurs 25(4):283–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hird A et al (2010) Exploration of symptoms clusters within cancer patients with brain metastases using the Spitzer Quality of Life Index. Supportive Care Cancer 18(3):335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown LF, Kroenke K (2009) Cancer-related fatigue and its associations with depression and anxiety: a systematic review. Psychosomatics 50(5):440–447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobsen P, Weitzner M (2004) Fatigue and depression in cancer patients: conceptual and clinical issues. Fatigue in cancer. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, pp 223–241

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kangas M, Bovbjerg DH, Montgomery GH (2008) Cancer-related fatigue: a systematic and meta-analytic review of non-pharmacological therapies for cancer patients. Psychol Bull 134(5):700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (1997) Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 277(7):582–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hickok J et al (2005) Frequency, severity, clinical course, and correlates of fatigue in 372 patients during 5 weeks of radiotherapy for cancer. Cancer 104(8):1772–1778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barsevick A, Dudley W, Beck S (2006) Cancer-related fatigue, depressive symptoms, and functional status: a mediation model. Nurs Res 55(5):366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mock V (2004) Evidence-based treatment for cancer-related fatigue. JNCI Monogr 2004(32):112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenstock I (1966) Why people use health service. Milbank Mem Fund Q 44:94–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Purcell A et al (2010) Development of an educational intervention for cancer-related fatigue. Br J Occup Ther 73(7):327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Purcell A et al (2011) Is education an effective management strategy for reducing cancer-related fatigue? Support Care Cancer 19(9):1429–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oken MM et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baron K et al (2006) A user’s manual for the occupational self-assessment (version 2.2). University of Illinois, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kielhofner G et al (2009) Developing the occupational self assessment: the use of Rasch analysis to assure internal validity, sensitivity and reliability. Br J Occup Ther 72(3):94–104

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smets E et al (1995) The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 39(3):315–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Purcell A et al (2010) Determining the minimal clinically important difference criteria for the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a radiotherapy population. Support Care Cancer 18(3):307–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dolan P, Roberts J (2002) Modelling valuations for EQ-5D health states: an alternative model using differences in valuations. Med Care 40(5):442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2003) Distress management clinical practice guidelines. J Natl Comp Cancer Netw 1:344–374

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vodermaier A, Linden W, Siu C (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Nat Cancer Inst 101(21):1464–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ransom S, Jacobsen PB, Booth–Jones M (2006) Validation of the Distress Thermometer with bone marrow transplant patients. Psychol–Oncol 15(7):604–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Twisk JW (2004) Longitudinal data analysis. A comparison between generalized estimating equations and random coefficient analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 19(8):769–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D (2007) Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Prue G et al (2006) Cancer-related fatigue: a critical appraisal. Eur J Cancer 42(7):846–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Servaes P, Verhagen C, Bleijenberg G (2002) Fatigue in cancer patients during and after treatment: prevalence, correlates and interventions. Eur J Cancer 38(1):27–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wee CC et al (2013) Expectations for weight loss and willingness to accept risk among patients seeking weight loss surgery. JAMA Surg 148(3):264–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Linde K et al (2007) The impact of patient expectations on outcomes in four randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in patients with chronic pain. Pain 128(3):264–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McPhail S, Haines T (2010) The response shift phenomenon in clinical trials. J Clin Res Best Pract 6(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the participants in this trial, who generously gave their time. We also thank the members of The Alfred Oncology department for their support and cooperation. This study was funded by the Southern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service Supportive Care Research Grants 2010–11.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Occupational Therapy Department, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, McMahon’s Rd, Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia

    Lisa O’Brien

  2. Occupational Therapy Department, The Alfred, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia

    Lisa O’Brien & Anna Loughnan

  3. Occupational Therapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia

    Amanda Purcell

  4. Allied Health Research Unit, Southern Health, Kingston Centre, Kingston Rd, Cheltenham, Victoria, 3192, Australia

    Terry Haines

  5. Southern Physiotherapy Clinical School, Physiotherapy Department, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, McMahon’s Rd, Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia

    Terry Haines

Authors
  1. Lisa O’Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Loughnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amanda Purcell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Terry Haines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa O’Brien.

Additional information

The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Brien, L., Loughnan, A., Purcell, A. et al. Education for cancer-related fatigue: could talking about it make people more likely to report it?. Support Care Cancer 22, 209–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1964-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1964-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation