Abstract
Habitats selected for development may have important fitness consequences. This is relevant within the framework of niche shifts in human-dominated landscapes. Currently, the peacock butterfly (Aglais io) occurs ubiquitously, covering many habitat types, whereas its distribution used to be much more restricted. Indeed, its host plant (stinging nettle Urtica dioica) was limited to natural forest gaps on relatively nitrogen-rich soil, but due to land use changes and eutrophication, host plants are now quasi-omnipresent in Western Europe. In order to assess the impact of specific anthropogenic habitat types on host plant quality and environmental conditions for phenotypic trait values, an experiment was conducted in woodlands, field margins, and urban gardens. Larval development was studied in field enclosures, and adult traits were analyzed to test predicted effects of warmer and more nitrogen-rich conditions in field margins compared to woodlands and urban gardens. Survival to the adult stage was highest in woodlands and lowest in field margins, and whilst development time did not differ amongst habitat types, butterflies that developed in field margins were larger and had higher lipid content and wing loadings than conspecifics from woodlands and urban gardens. Nettles in field margins provided warmer microclimates. However, and contrary to predictions, the nitrogen level within host plant leaves was highest in woodlands. Hence, anthropogenic landscapes may pose a conflict for choosing what is ultimately the best breeding habitat, as survival was highest in woodlands (followed by urban gardens), but adults with highest fitness predictions were produced in field margins (and secondarily urban gardens).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844
Baker RR (1969) The evolution of the migratory habit in butterflies. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 253:310–341
Baker RR (1972) Territorial behaviour of the nymphalid butterflies, Aglais urticae (L.) and Inachis io (L.). J Anim Ecol 41:453–469
Bergerot B, Julliard R, Baguette M (2010) Metacommunity dynamics: decline of functional relationship along a habitat fragmentation gradient. PLoS ONE 5(6):e11294
Bergerot B, Merckx T, Van Dyck H, Baguette M (2011) Landscape variables impact the structure and composition of butterfly assemblages along an urbanization gradient. Landsc Ecol 26:83–94
Berwaerts K, Matthysen E, Van Dyck H (2008) Take-off flight performance in the butterfly Pararge aegeria relative to sex and morphology: a quantitative genetic assessment. Evolution 62:2525–2533
Betzholtz PE, Pettersson LB, Ryrholm N, Franzén M (2013) With that diet, you will go far: trait-based analysis reveals a link between rapid range expansion and a nitrogen-favoured diet. Proc R Soc (B) 280:1–6
Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, Bustamante M, Cinderby S, Davidson E, Dentener F, Emmett B, Erisman JW, Fenn M, Gilliam F, Nordin A, Pardo L, De Vries W (2010) Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 20:30–59
Bryant S, Bale J, Thomas C (1999) Comparison of development and growth of nettle-feeding larvae of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) under constant and alternating temperature regimes. Eur J Entomol 96:143–148
Cowley MJR, Thomas CD, Roy DB, Wilson RJ, Leon-Cortéz JL, Gutiérrez D, Bulman CR, Quinn RM, Moss D, Gaston KJ (2001) Density–distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. J Anim Ecol 70:410–425
Crispo E, DiBattista JD, Correa C, Thibert-Plante X, McKellar AE, Schwartz AK, Berner D, De Léon LF, Hendry AP (2010) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in response to anthropogenic disturbance. Evol Ecol Res 12:47–66
Danthanarayana W (1976) Environmentally cued size variation in the light-brown moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walk.) (Tortricidae), and its adaptive value in dispersal. Oecologia 26:121–132
Fischer K, Fiedler K (2000) Response of the copper butterfly Lycaena tityrus to increased leaf nitrogen in natural food plants: evidence against the nitrogen limitation hypothesis. Oecologia 124:235–241
Gibbs M, Van Dyck H, Breuker CJ (2012) Development on drought-stressed host plants affects life history, flight morphology and reproductive output relative to landscape structure. Evol Appl 5:66–75
Gripenberg S, Hamer N, Brereton T, Roy DB, Lewis OT (2011) A novel parasitoid and a declining butterfly: cause or coincidence? Ecol Entomol 36:271–281
Jandle R, Kopeszki H, Bruckner A, Hager H (2003) Forest soil chemistry and mesofauna 20 years after an amelioration fertilization. Restor Ecol 11:239–246
Janz N, Nylin S (1997) The role of female search behaviour in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond (B) 264:701–707
Karlsson B, Van Dyck H (2009) Evolutionary ecology of butterfly fecundity. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of Butterflies in Europe. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 189–197
Klimesova J (1995) Population dynamics of Phalaris arundinacea L. and Urtica dioica L. in a floodplain during a dry period. Wetlands Ecol Manage 3:79–85
Kotiaho JS, Kaitala V, Päivinen J (2005) Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics. Proc Nat Acad Sci (USA) 102:1963–1967
Kudrna O, Harpke A, Lux K, Pennerstorfer J, Schweiger O, Settele J (2011) Distribution Atlas of Butterflies in Europe. GfS, Halle
Marden JH (1989) Bodybuilding dragonflies: costs and benefits of maximizing flight muscle. Physiol Zool 62:505–521
Merckx T, Van Dongen S, Matthysen E, Van Dyck H (2008) Thermal flight budget of a woodland butterfly in woodland versus agricultural landscapes: an experimental assessment. Basic Appl Ecol 9:433–442
Mevi-Schütz J, Erhardt A (2005) Amino acids in nectar enhance butterfly fecundity: a long-awaited link. Am Nat 165:411–419
Moller AP (2010) The fitness benefit of association with humans: elevated success of birds breeding indoors. Behav Ecol 21:913–918
Ohsaki N, Sato Y (1994) Food plant choice of Pieris butterflies as a trade-off between parasitoid avoidance and quality of plants. Ecology 75:59–68
Olsen C (1921) The ecology of Urtica dioica. J Ecol 9:1–18
Pigott CD (1971) Analysis of the response of Urtica dioica to phosphate. New Phytol 70:953–966
Pullin AS (1986a) Influence of the food plant, Urtica dioica, on larval development, feeding efficiences, and voltinism of a specialist insect, Inachis io. Holarctic Ecol 9:72–78
Pullin AS (1986b) Effect of photoperiod and temperature on the life-cycle of different populations of the peacock butterfly Inachis io. Entomol Exper Appl 41:237–242
Pullin AS (1987) Changes in leaf quality following clipping and regrowth of Urtica dioica, and consequences for a specialist insect herbivore, Aglais urticae. Oikos 49:39–45
Robertson BA, Rehage JS, Sih A (2013) Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 28:552–560
Rusterholz HP, Erhardt A (1997) Preferences for nectar sugars in the peacock butterfly, Inachis io. Ecol Entomol 22:220–224
Shreeve TG, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H (2009) The functional significance of butterfly wing morphology variation. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of Butterflies in Europe. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 171–188
Sih A (2013) Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview. Anim Behav 85:1077–1088
Southwood TRE (1962) Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. Biol Rev Cambridge Phil Soc 37:171–214
Spangenberg A, Kölling C (2004) Nitrogen deposition and nitrate leaching at forest edges exposed to high ammonia emissions in southern Bavaria. Water Air Soil Poll 152:233–255
Strutek M (1997) Growth responses of Urtica dioica L. to different water table depth. Plant Ecol 130:163–169
Talloen W, Van Dyck H, Lens L (2004) The cost of melanization: butterfly wing coloration under environmental stress. Evolution 58:360–366
Taylor K (2009) Biological flora of the British Isles: urtica dioica L. J Ecol 97:1436–1458
Thomas JA (1993) Holocene climate change and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies inhabit unnatural early successional habitats. Ecography 16:278–284
Van Dijk HWJ, de Groot WT (1987) Eutrophication of a coastal dune area by artificial infiltration. Water Res 21:11–18
Van Dyck H, Van Strien AJ, Maes D, Van Swaay CAM (2009) Declines in common, widespread butterflies in a landscape under intense human use. Conserv Biol 23:957–965
Van Landuyt W, Hoste I, Vanhecke L, Van den Brempt P, Vercruysse W, De Beer D 2006. Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest. Instituut voor Natuur- en Bosonderzoek, Nationale Plantentuin van België & Flo.Wer, Brussels
Vandewoestijne S, Nève G, Baguette M (1999) Spatial and temporal population structure of the butterfly Aglais urticae (Lepidoptera: nymphalidae). Molec Ecol 8:1639–1644
Wickman PO (1992) Sexual selection and butterfly design: a comparative study. Evolution 46:1525–1536
Many thanks are due to Benoit Pernechele for helping us collect data, to Gilles San Martin y Gomez for statistical advice, and to Thomas Merckx, Julie Lebeau, and Camille Turlure for their most helpful comments. MS was funded by a FRIA fellowship (F.R.S.-F.N.R.S.). The study was supported by an ARC grant and a PAI grant to HVD (ARC Grant no. 10/15-031 and Grant PAI P7/04). This is publication BRC 318 of the Biodiversity Research Centre (Earth and Life Institute, UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Klaus Fischer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serruys, M., Van Dyck, H. Development, survival, and phenotypic plasticity in anthropogenic landscapes: trade-offs between offspring quantity and quality in the nettle-feeding peacock butterfly. Oecologia 176, 379–387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3016-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3016-5