Skip to main content
Log in

Inattentional deafness in music

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While inattentional blindness is a modern classic in attention and perception research, analogous phenomena of inattentional deafness have been widely neglected. We here present the first investigation of inattentional deafness in and with music under controlled experimental conditions. Inattentional deafness in music is defined as the inability to consciously perceive an unexpected musical stimulus when attention is focused on a certain facet of the piece. Participants listened to a modification of the first 1′50″ of Richard Strauss’ Thus Spake Zarathustra; while the control group just listened, the experimental group had to count the number of timpani beats. An e-guitar solo served as the unexpected event. In Study 1, experimental data from n = 115 participants were analyzed. Non-musicians were compared with musicians to investigate the impact of expertise. In Study 2 (n = 47), the scope of the inattentional deafness effect was investigated with a more salient unexpected stimulus. Results demonstrate an inattentional deafness effect under dynamic musical conditions. Quite unexpectedly, the effect was structurally equivalent even for musicians. Our findings clearly show that sustained inattentional deafness exists in the musical realm, in close correspondence to inattentional blindness with dynamic visual stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Due to cells with zero frequencies, we repeated the model selection procedure with a constant of 1 added either to all cells or to all zero frequency cells. Both analyses resulted in the same final model with significant main effects and no interactions, as well as the same rank order of B-weights for the main effects.

References

  • Arons, B. (1992). A review of the cocktail party effect. Journal of the American Voice I/O Society, 12, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 191–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byo, J. L. (1993). The influence of textural and timbral factors on the ability of music majors to detect performance errors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A., Cavanagh, P., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (2012). The attentional requirements of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 411–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, P., & Fraenkel, N. (2012). Gorillas we have missed: sustained inattentional deafness for dynamic events. Cognition, 124, 367–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eramudugolla, R., Irvine, D. R. F., McAnally, K. I., Martin, R. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2005). Directed attention eliminates ‘change deafness’ in complex auditory scenes. Current Biology, 15, 1108–1113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenn, K. M., Shintel, H., Atkins, A. S., Skipper, J. I., Bond, V. C., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2011). When less is heard than meets the ear: change deafness in a telephone conversation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1442–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furley, P., Memmert, D., & Heller, C. (2010). The dark side of visual awareness in sport: inattentional blindness in a real-world basketball task. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 1327–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. R., & Burke, D. M. (2011). Aging increases inattentional blindness to the gorilla in our midst. Psychology and Aging, 26, 162–166.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I., Lawo, V., Fels, J., & Vorländer, M. (2011). Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1140–1147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koelsch, S., Schröger, E., & Tervaniemi, M. (1999). Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in muscians. NeuroReport, 10, 1309–1313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koivisto, M., Hyönä, J., & Revonsuo, A. (2004). The effects of eye movements, spatial attention, and stimulus features on inattentional blindness. Vision Research, 44, 3211–3221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koreimann, S., Strauß, S., & Vitouch, O. (2009). Inattentional deafness under dynamic musical conditions. In J. Louhivuori, T. Eerola, S. Saarikallio, T. Himberg, & P.-S. Eerola (eds.), Proceedings of the 7 th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, ESCOM 2009 (PDF, pp. 246–249). Jyväskylä, Finland: Dept. of Music, University of Jyväskylä.

  • Macdonald, J. S. P., & Lavie, N. (2011). Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73, 1780–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmert, D. (2006). The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 620–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12, 9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Münte, T. F., Kohlmetz, C., Nager, W., & Altenmüller, E. (2001). Superior auditory spatial tuning in conductors. Nature, 409, 580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H. (1996). The art of inaccuracy: why pianists’ errors are difficult to hear. Music Perception, 14, 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, K., Zysset, S., Mueller, K., Friederici, A. D., & Koelsch, S. (2011). Neuroarchitecture of verbal and tonal working memory in nonmusicians and musicians. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 771–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seegmiller, J. K., Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2011). Individual differences in susceptibility to inattentional blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 785–791.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, D. A. (2004). Effects of multiple listenings on error-detection acuity in multivoice, multitimbral musical examples. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 147–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., & Jensen, M. S. (2009). The effects of individual differences and task difficulty on inattentional blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 398–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnett, S., Costa, A., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2006). Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1425–1442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. S., & Gregg, M. K. (2011). Memory for sound, with an ear toward hearing in complex auditory scenes. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73, 1993–2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., & Read, L. (2003). Speech shadowing while driving: on the difficulty of splitting attentions between eye and ear. Psychological Science, 14, 251–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitevitch, M. S. (2003). Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 333–342.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitevitch, M. S., & Donoso, A. (2011). Processing of indexical information requires time: evidence from change deafness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1484–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitouch, O. (2005). Erwerb musikalischer Expertise [Aquisiction of musical expertise]. In T. H. Stoffer & R. Oerter (Eds.), Allgemeine Musikpsychologie (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Vol. D/VII/1, pp. 657–715). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

  • Wayand, J. F., Levin, D. T., & Varakin, D. A. (2005). Inattentional blindness for a noxious multimodal stimulus. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., & Thies, B. (2000). Is “change blindness” attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expert-novices comparison of change detection in football images. Visual Cognition, 7, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N., & Cowan, N. (1995a). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 255–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N., & Cowan, N. (1995b). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zendel, B. R., & Alain, C. (2008). Concurrent sound segregation is enhanced in musicians. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 21, 1488–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Primus Sitter for his pro bono help with stimulus design, to Sabine Strauß for her support with stimulus selection, and to Judith Glück and Rainer Alexandrowicz for numerous helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. A preliminary report on this work has been published in the Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (Koreimann, Strauß, & Vitouch, 2009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bartosz Gula.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material (MP3 1.72 mb)

Supplementary material (MP3 1.73 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koreimann, S., Gula, B. & Vitouch, O. Inattentional deafness in music. Psychological Research 78, 304–312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0552-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0552-x

Keywords

Navigation