Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A pilot study to image the vascular network of small melanocytic choroidal tumors with speckle noise-free 1050-nm swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT choroidal angiography)

  • Oncology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To visualize and measure the vascular network of melanocytic choroidal tumors with speckle noise-free swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT choroidal angiography).

Methods

Melanocytic choroidal tumors from 24 eyes were imaged with 1050-nm optical coherence tomography (Topcon DRI OCT-1 Atlantis). A semi-automated algorithm was developed to remove speckle noise and to extract and measure the volume of the choroidal vessels from the obtained OCT data.

Results

In all cases, analysis of the choroidal vessels could be performed with SS-OCT without the need for pupillary dilation. The proposed method allows speckle noise-free, structure-guided visualization and measurement of the larger choroidal vessels in three dimensions. The obtained data suggest that speckle noise-free OCT may be more effective at identifying choroidal structures than traditional OCT methods. The measured volume of the extracted choroidal vessels of Haller’s layer and Sattler’s layer in the examined tumorous eyes was on average 0.982463955 mm3 /982463956 μm3 (range of 0.209764406 mm3 /209764405.9 μm3to 1.78105544 mm3 /1781055440 μm3). Full thickness obstruction of the choroidal vasculature by the tumor was found in 18 cases (72 %). In seven cases (18 %), choroidal vessel architecture did not show pronounced morphological abnormalities (18 %).

Conclusion

Speckle noise-free OCT may serve as a new illustrative imaging technology and enhance visualization of the choroidal vessels without the need for dye injection. OCT can be used to identify and evaluate the choroidal vessels of melanocytic choroidal tumors, and may represent a potentially useful tool for imaging and monitoring of choroidal nevi and melanoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Augsburger JJ, Corrêa ZM, Trichopoulos N, Shaikh A (2008) Size overlap between benign melanocytic choroidal nevi and choroidal malignant melanomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(7):2823–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McLaughlin CC, Wu XC, Jemal A, Martin HJ, Roche LM, Chen VW (2005) Incidence of noncutaneous melanomas in the US. Cancer 103(5):1000–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jovanovic P, Mihajlovic M, Djordjevic-Jocic J et al (2013) Ocular melanoma: an overview of the current status. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 6(7):1230–1244

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kujala E, Mäkitie T, Kivelä T (2003) Very long-term prognosis of patients with malignant uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(11):4651–4659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doro D, Kotsafti O, Cimatti P (2013) Long-term echographic surveillance of elevated choroidal nevi. Am J Ophthalmol 156(3):438–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heimann H, Jmor F, Damato B (2013) Imaging of retinal and choroidal vascular tumours. Eye 27(2):208–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Shields CL, Materin MA, Shields JA (2005) Review of optical coherence tomography for intraocular tumors. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16(3):141–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Natesh S, Chin KJ, Finger PT (2010) Choroidal metastases fundus autofluorescence imaging: correlation to clinical, OCT, and fluorescein angiographic findings. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 41(4):406–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sayanagi K, Pelayes DE, Kaiser PK, Singh AD (2011) 3D spectral domain optical coherence tomography findings in choroidal tumors. Eur J Ophthalmol 21(3):271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaudig U, Hassenstein A, Bernd A, Walter A, Richard G (1998) Limitations of imaging choroidal tumors in vivo by optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236(8):588–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Asrani S, Essaid L, Alder BD, Santiago-Turla C (2014) Artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurements in glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 132(4):396–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tatham AJ, Marchase N, Weinreb RN (2014) Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept-source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts. Am J Ophthalmol 157(5):1022–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC (2008) Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 146(4):496–500. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shields CL, Kaliki S, Rojanaporn D, Ferenczy SR, Shields JA (2012) Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of small choroidal melanoma: Comparison with choroidal nevus. Arch Ophthalmol 130(7):850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alonso-Caneiro D, Read SA, Collins MJ (2013) Automatic segmentation of choroidal thickness in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 4(12):2795–2812

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kajić V, Esmaeelpour M, Považay B, Marshall D, Rosin PL, Drexler W (2012) Automated choroidal segmentation of 1060 nm OCT in healthy and pathologic eyes using a statistical model. Biomed Opt Express 3(1):86–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kajić V, Esmaeelpour M, Glittenberg C et al (2013) Automated three-dimensional choroidal vessel segmentation of 3D 1060 nm OCT retinal data. Biomed Opt Express 4(1):134–50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Esmaeelpour M, Kajic V, Zabihian B et al (2014) Choroidal Haller’s and Sattler’s layer thickness measurement using 3-dimensional 1060-nm optical coherence tomography. PLoS ONE 9(6), e99690. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099690

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Maloca P, Gyger C, Hasler WP (2015) Ultra-short-term reproducibility of speckle-noise freed fluid and tissue compartmentalization of the choroid analyzed by standard spectral OCT. Transl Vis Sci Technol 4(6):3

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Girard MJ, Strouthidis NG, Ethier CR, Mari JM (2011) Shadow removal and contrast enhancement in optical coherence tomography images of the human optic nerve head. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(10):7738–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gyger C, Hasler P, Cattin R, Maloca P (2014) Three-dimensional speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography through structural guided filtering. Opt Eng 53(7):073105. doi:10.1117/1.OE.53.7.073105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pizer SM, Amburn EP, Austin JD et al (1987) Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Comput Vision Graph 39:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Staurenghi G, Sadda S, Chakravarthy U, Spaide RF (2014) International nomenclature for optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.02.023

    Google Scholar 

  24. Basdekidou C, Wolff B, Vasseur V, Mer YL, Sahel JA (2011) Flat choroidal nevus inaccessible to ultrasound sonography evaluated by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2(2):185–188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Materin MA et al (2005) Optical coherence tomography of choroidal nevus in 120 patients. Retina 25(3):243–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Say EA, Shah SU, Ferenczy S, Shields CL (2012) Optical coherence tomography of retinal and choroidal tumors. J Ophthalmol 2012:385058

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Maloca.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

Peter Maloca and Cyrill Gyger are owners of intellectual property on speckle noise analysis technology discussed in this manuscript. Peter Maloca and Pascal Hasler are consultants and have received lecture fees from Mediconsult/Topcon, and Optos, and grant support from Mediconsult/Topcon. The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of the current study. All authors certify that, except as indicated above, they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maloca, P., Gyger, C. & Hasler, P.W. A pilot study to image the vascular network of small melanocytic choroidal tumors with speckle noise-free 1050-nm swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT choroidal angiography). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254, 1201–1210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3259-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3259-9

Keywords

Navigation