Abstract
The sensitivity of the predictive skill of a decadal climate prediction system is investigated with respect to details of the initialization procedure. For this purpose, the coupled ocean–atmosphere UCLA/MITgcm climate model is initialized using the following three different initialization approaches: full state initialization (FSI), anomaly initialization (AI) and FSI employing heat flux and freshwater flux corrections (FC). The ocean initial conditions are provided by the German contribution to Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean state estimate (GECCO project), from which ensembles of decadal hindcasts are initialized every 5 years from 1961 to 2001. The predictive skill for sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface height (SSH) and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is assessed against the GECCO synthesis. In regions with a deep mixed layer the predictive skill for SST anomalies remains significant for up to a decade in the FC experiment. By contrast, FSI shows less persistent skill in the North Atlantic and AI does not show high skill in the extratropical Southern Hemisphere, but appears to be more skillful in the tropics. In the extratropics, the improved skill is related to the ability of the FC initialization method to better represent the mixed layer depth, and the highest skill occurs during wintertime. The correlation skill for the spatially averaged North Atlantic SSH hindcasts remains significant up to a decade only for FC. The North Atlantic MOC initialized hindcasts show high correlation values in the first pentad while correlation remains significant in the following pentad too for FSI and FC. Overall, for the current setup, the FC approach appears to lead to the best results, followed by the FSI and AI procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander M, Deser C (1994) A mechanism for the recurrence of wintertime midlatitude SST anomalies. J Phys Oceanogr 25:122–137
Bloom S, Takacs L, Da Silva A, Ledvina D (1996) Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon Weather Rev 124(6):1256–1271
Branstator G, Teng H (2010) Two limits of initial-value decadal predictability in a CGCM. J Clim 23(23):6292–6311
Carton J, Santorelli A (2008) Global decadal upper-ocean heat content as viewed in nine analyses. J Clim 21(22):6015–6035
Cazes-Boezio G, Menemenlis D, Mechoso C (2008) Impact of ECCO ocean-state estimates on the initialization of seasonal climate forecasts. J Clim 21(9):1929–1947
Ciasto L, Thompson D (2009) Observational evidence of reemergence in the extratropical Southern Hemisphere. J Clim 22(6):1446–1453
Collins M (2002) Climate predictability on interannual to decadal time scales: the initial value problem. Clim Dyn 19(8):671–692
Collins M, Botzet M, Carril A, Drange H, Jouzeau A, Latif M, Masina S, Otteraa O, Pohlmann H, Sorteberg A et al (2006) Interannual to decadal climate predictability in the North Atlantic: a multimodel-ensemble study. J Clim 19(7):1195–1203
Doblas-Reyes F, Balmaseda M, Weisheimer A, Palmer T (2011a) Decadal climate prediction with the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts coupled forecast system: impact of ocean observations. J Geophys Res 116(D19):D19111
Doblas-Reyes F, van Oldenborgh G, García-Serrano J, Pohlmann H, Scaife A, Smith D (2011b) CMIP5 near-term climate prediction. WCRP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-Phase 5 (CMIP5), p 8
Frankignoul C, Hasselmann K (1977) Stochastic climate models, part II application to sea-surface temperature anomalies and thermocline variability. Tellus 29(4):289–305
Goddard L, Kumar A, Solomon A, Smith D, Boer G, Gonzalez P, Kharin V, Merryfield W, Deser C, Mason S, et al (2012a) A verification framework for interannual-to-decadal predictions experiments. Clim Dyn 40:245–272
Goddard L, Hurrell J, Kirtman BP, Murphy J, Stockdale T, Vera C (2012b) Two time scales for the price of one (almost). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(5):621–629
Gregory JM, Dixon KW, Stouffer RJ, Weaver AJ, Driesschaert E, Eby M, Fichefet T, Hasumi H, Hu A, Jungclaus JH et al (2005) A model intercomparison of changes in the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geophys Res Lett 32(12):L12703
Hazeleger W, Guemas V, Wouters B, Corti S, Andreu-Burillo I, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Wyser K, Caian M (2013) Multiyear climate predictions using two initialisation strategies CO2 concentration. Geophy Res Lett. doi:10.1002/grl.50355
Keenlyside N, Latif M, Jungclaus J, Kornblueh L, Roeckner E (2008) Advancing decadal-scale climate prediction in the North Atlantic sector. Nature 453(7191):84–88
Köhl A, Stammer D (2008a) Decadal sea level changes in the 50-year GECCO ocean synthesis. J Clim 21(9):1876–1890
Köhl A, Stammer D (2008b) Variability of the meridional overturning in the North Atlantic from the 50-year GECCO state estimation. J Phys Oceanogr 38(9):1913–1930
Kröger J, Müller W, von Storch J (2012) Impact of different ocean reanalyses on decadal climate prediction. Clim Dyn 39:795–810
Lee T, Awaji T, Balmaseda M, Ferry N, Fujii Y, Fukumori I, Giese B, Heimbach P, Köhl A, Masina S et al (2010) Consistency and fidelity of Indonesian-throughflow total volume transport estimated by 14 ocean data assimilation products. Dyn Atmos Ocean 50(2):201–223
Leeuwenburgh O, Stammer D (2001) The effect of ocean currents on sea surface temperature anomalies. J Phys Oceanogr 31(8):2340–2358
Magnusson L, Alonso-Balmaseda M, Corti S, Molteni F, Stockdale T (2012) Evaluation of forecast strategies for seasonal and decadal forecasts in presence of systematic model errors. Clim Dyn 1–17. doi:10.1007/s00,382-012-1599-2
Marshall J, Nurser A, Williams R (1993) Inferring the subduction rate and period over the North Atlantic. J Phys Oceanogr 23:1315
Marshall J, Kushnir Y, Battisti D, Chang P, Czaja A, Dickson R, Hurrell J, McCARTNEY M, Saravanan R, Visbeck M (2001) North Atlantic climate variability: phenomena, impacts and mechanisms. Int J Climatol 21(15):1863–1898
Matei D, Pohlmann H, Jungclaus J, Müller W, Haak H, Marotzke J (2012) Two tales of initializing decadal climate prediction experiments with the ECHAM5/MPI-OM model. J Clim 25:8502–8523
Meehl G, Goddard L, Murphy J, Stouffer R, Boer G, Danabasoglu G, Dixon K, Giorgetta M, Greene A, Hawkins E et al (2009) Decadal prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(10):1467–1485
Meehl G, Goddard L, Boer G, Burgman R, Branstator G, Cassou C, Corti S, Danabasoglu G, Doblas-Reyes F, Hawkins E, et al (2013) Decadal climate prediction: an update from the Trenches. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00241.1
Menary M, Roberts C, Palmer M, Halloran P, Jackson L, Wood R, Müller W, Matei D Lee S (2013) Mechanisms of aerosol-forced AMOC variability in a state of the art climate model. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:2087–2096
Mochizuki T, Ishii M, Kimoto M, Chikamoto Y, Watanabe M, Nozawa T, Sakamoto T, Shiogama H, Awaji T, Sugiura N et al (2010) Pacific decadal oscillation hindcasts relevant to near-term climate prediction. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107(5):1833–1837
Munoz E, Kirtman B, Weijer W (2011) Varied representation of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning across multidecadal ocean reanalyses. Deep Sea Res II 58:1848–1857
Pohlmann H, Jungclaus J, Köhl A, Stammer D, Marotzke J (2009) Initializing decadal climate predictions with the GECCO oceanic synthesis: effects on the North Atlantic. J Clim 22(14):3926–3938
Qiu B, Huang R (1995) Ventilation of the North Atlantic and North Pacific: subduction versus obduction. J Phys Oceanogr 25:2374–2390
Rayner N, Parker D, Horton E, Folland C, Alexander L, Rowell D, Kent E, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108(D14):4407
Robertson A, Overpeck J, Rind D, Mosley-Thompson E, Zielinski G, Lean J, Koch D, Penner J, Tegen I, Healy R (2001) Hypothesized climate forcing time series for the last 500 years. J Geophys Res 106(D14):14783–14803
Sausen R, Barthel K, Hasselmann K (1988) Coupled ocean–atmosphere models with flux correction. Clim Dyn 2(3):145–163
Shackley S, Risbey J, Stone P, Wynne B (1999) Adjusting to policy expectations in climate change modeling. Clim Chang 43(2):413–454
Smith D, Cusack S, Colman A, Folland C, Harris G, Murphy J (2007) Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model. Science 317(5839):796–799
Smith D, Eade R, Pohlmann H (2013) A comparison of full-field and anomaly initialization for seasonal and decadal climate prediction. Clim Dyn 1–14. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1683-2
Stammer D, Kohl A, Awaji T, Balmaseda M, ECMWF S, Reading R, Behringer D, Center C, Carton J, Ferry N, et al (2009) Ocean information provided through ensemble ocean syntheses. Proceedings of OceanObs’ 09: Sustained Ocean Observations for Society
Stammer D, Agarwal N, Herrmann P, Köhl A, Mechoso C (2011) Response of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to Greenland ice melting. Surv Geophysics 32:621–642
Stockdale T (1997) Coupled ocean–atmosphere forecasts in the presence of climate drift. Mon Weather Rev 125(5):809–818
Tans P (2011) Mauna Loa CO2 annual mean data. ESRL report http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends
Taylor K, Stouffer R, Meehl G (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485
Troccoli A, Palmer T (2007) Ensemble decadal predictions from analysed initial conditions. Philos Transa R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1857):2179–2191
van Oldenborgh G, Doblas-Reyes F, Wouters B, Hazeleger W (2012) Decadal prediction skill in a multi-model ensemble. Clim Dyn 38:1263–1280
Vinogradova N, Ponte R, Stammer D (2007) Relation between sea level and bottom pressure and the vertical dependence of oceanic variability. Geophys Res Lett 34(3):L03608
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Neeraj Agarwal for his help with setting up the model runs and for discussion of the results. We also thank Drs. Holger Pohlmann and Daniela Matei, Prof. Dr. Johanna Baehr and Prof. Dr. Jochem Marotzke for the discussion of our results and two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped us to improve this manuscript. This work was supported in part by the Max Planck Fellow Program through the project “Coupled Climate System Data Assimilation”. The authors acknowledge funding from the European Community’s 7th framework program (FP7/2007–2013) under Grant Agreement No. GA212643 (THOR: “Thermohaline Overturning—at Risk”, 2008–2012). All model simulations were performed at the German Climate Computing Centre (DKRZ). The altimeter products were produced by Ssalto/Duacs and distributed by Aviso, with support from Cnes (http://www.aviso.oceanobs.com/duacs/).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polkova, I., Köhl, A. & Stammer, D. Impact of initialization procedures on the predictive skill of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Clim Dyn 42, 3151–3169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1969-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1969-4