Climate simulation over CORDEX Africa domain using the fifth-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5)
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Hernández-Díaz, L., Laprise, R., Sushama, L. et al. Clim Dyn (2013) 40: 1415. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1387-z
- 1.8k Downloads
The new fifth-generation Regional Climate Model (CRCM5) was driven by ERA reanalyses for the period 1984–2008 over the African continent following the CORDEX experimental protocol. Overall the model succeeds in reproducing the main features of the geographical distribution and seasonal cycle of temperature and precipitation, the diurnal cycle of precipitation, and the West African Monsoon (WAM). Biases in surface temperature and precipitation are discussed in relation with some circulation defects noted in the simulation. In the African regions near the equator, the model successfully reproduces the double peak of rainfall due to the double passage of the tropical rainbelt, although it better simulates the magnitude and timing of the second peak of precipitation. CRCM5 captures the timing of the monsoon onset for the Sahel region but underestimates the magnitude of precipitation. The simulated diurnal cycle is quite well simulated for all of the regions, but is always somewhat in advance for the timing of rainfall peak. In boreal summer the CRCM5 simulation exhibits a weak cold bias over the Sahara and the maximum temperature is located too far south, resulting in a southward bias in the position of the Saharan Heat Low. The region of maximum ascent in the deep meridional circulation of the Hadley cell is well located in the CRCM5 simulation, but it is somewhat too narrow. The core of the African Easterly Jet is of the right strength and almost at the right height, but it is displayed slightly southward, as a consequence of the southward bias in the position of the Saharan Heat Low and the thermal wind relationship. These biases appear to be germane to the WAM rainfall band being narrower and not moving far enough northward, resulting in a dry bias in the Sahel.
KeywordsRegional Climate Modelling Africa West African Monsoon CORDEX
In recent years there has been a surge of international interest in the study of the Africa’s climate and in particular the mechanisms explaining the geographic distribution and time variability of rainfall. This is understandable as Africa is not only an exceptionally vulnerable region to climate change “because of the range of predicted impacts and low adaptive capacity” (IPCC AR4 2007), but also to current levels of weather variability. In particular, semiarid regions such as the Sahel are heavily dependent on seasonal rainfall. Severe droughts in this region have led to famine and deaths in the 1970s and 1980s (Druyan 2010). More recently, a severe drought led to a humanitarian crisis affecting 13 million people in the Horn of Africa region (www.redcross.ca). Last but not the least, it has became clear from the IPCC AR4 (2007) that climate models have difficulties in simulating key elements of present day climate for this continent and hence there is a need to further the understanding of the multiple interactions between the components of the African climate in order to improve climate simulations and projections for this region of the world.
One major element of the African climate is the West African Monsoon (WAM) for which substantial data collection and modelling efforts have been deployed since the African Multidisciplinary Monsoon Analysis (AMMA) project (Redelsperger et al. 2006); to name but a few: the AMMA Model Intercomparison Project (AMMA-MIP; Hourdin et al. 2010), the AMMA land-surface Model Intercomparison Project (ALMIP; Boone et al. 2009), the AMMA “Couplage de l’Atmosphère Tropicale et du Cycle Hydrologique” (AMMA-CATCH) project (Lebel et al. 2009), the West African Monsoon Modelling and Evaluation (WAMME) project (Xue et al. 2010; Druyan et al. 2010), and the Ensembles-based Predictions of Climate Change and their Impacts (ENSEMBLES) African project (Paeth et al. 2011).
It is thus not surprisingly that only in the last 2 years, six Journals have dedicated Special Issues to different aspects of the WAM system: Climate Dynamics (2010)—West African Climate; Journal of Hydrology (2009)—Surface processes and water cycle in West Africa studied from the AMMA-observing system; International Journal of Climatology (2009)—African Climate and Applications; Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (2010)—Advances in understanding atmospheric processes over West Africa through the AMMA field campaign; Weather and Forecasting (2010)—West African weather prediction and predictability; Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (2010)—Tropical Cloud Systems and Processes (TCSP) NASA African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analyses (NAMMA) campaign.
Africa is also the first target region of the COordinated Regional Climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX; Giorgi et al. 2009; http://cordex.dmi.dk/joomla/), an initiative of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP; http://www.wcrp-climate.org/) aiming at regional climate modelling evaluation and improvement. CORDEX also provides an opportunity to test the model outside its native region, as strongly recommended by the GEWEX Transferability Working Group (TWG; http://rcmlab.agron.iastate.edu/twg/regional.html) and Inter-Continental Scale Experiments (CSE) transferability Study (ICTS; http://www.clm-community.eu/index.php?menuid=1&reporeid=25; Takle et al. 2007).
The diversity of climate regimes over Africa, covering tropical and mid-latitudes in both hemispheres, represents a considerable challenge for climate models (IPCC AR4 2007). A recent analysis of simulated precipitation climatology from the first set of CORDEX-Africa ensemble simulations can be found in a recent paper by Nikulin et al. (2012).
It is in this context that the new fifth-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5) has been applied to CORDEX-Africa, which appears a good opportunity to study the model performance in simulating the key elements of the African climate, including the WAM. The aim of this paper is to describe CRCM5 and to show its skill in simulating present climate over a domain outside its “native” region as recommended by the WCRP: the CORDEX-Africa domain. The main features of CRCM5 are described in Sect. 2. Section 3 follows with a description of the configuration of the model simulations and the data used as reference, and Sect. 4 with the presentation and discussion of results including the annual and diurnal cycle of precipitation over the continent and the simulated WAM climatology. Conclusions are given in Sect. 5.
2 Model description
CRCM5 uses the dynamical core and several subgrid-scale physical parameterisation modules of the Canadian Global Environment Multiscale (GEM) model, in a limited-area model (LAM) configuration (Zadra et al. 2008).
The GEM model was developed for Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) at the Division de Recherche en Prévision Numérique (RPN) of the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC; Côté et al. 1998a, b). GEM uses a two-time-level (almost) fully implicit semi-Lagrangian marching scheme, with slight off-centring to reduce the spurious response to orographic forcing (Tanguay et al. 1992). In the horizontal the discretisation uses an Arakawa staggered C-grid and in the vertical a hybrid terrain-following hydrostatic-pressure coordinate (Laprise 1992). Initially GEM offered two configurations within a single global modelling system based on a latitude-longitude grid, with optional rotation of the poles: a regular latitude-longitude version and a variable-resolution stretched-grid version. Shortly after a fully elastic non-hydrostatic option was implemented (Yeh et al. 2002), the model was adapted for distributed-memory massively parallel computers, and a nested LAM option was also developed.
The nested LAM version of GEM was adopted for the developmental version of the CRCM5 that was initiated more than a decade ago through a collaboration established between ESCER/UQAM, RPN/MSC and the OURANOS Consortium. In CRCM5 one-way nesting is implemented following Davies (1976): over a 10 grid-point “sponge” ribbon around the domain perimeter, the simulated atmospheric variables are gradually relaxed towards the imposed lateral boundary conditions for horizontal winds, temperature, specific humidity and surface pressure fields. In addition a 10 grid-point “halo” region is added around the domain in order to provide upstream values for the semi-Lagrangian transport scheme; there are no calculations performed in this halo region, other than interpolating for the upstream values. An option also exists for weakly nudging the large scales within the interior of the domain, similar to earlier versions of CRCM (e.g. Biner et al. 2000; Riette and Caya 2002; Laprise 2008), although this option will not be activated for the experiments reported here. However the temperature at the uppermost level of CRCM5 is forced to the value of the driving data.
GEM supports a diversity of subgrid-scale physical parameterisations, depending upon the application and resolution. CRCM5 employs a mixture of the parameterisation modules of GEM in its so-called “meso global” and “regional” versions (based on MSC’s source-code libraries 3.3.3 for the Dynamics and 5.0.4 for the Physics). GEM is used for 3- to 5-day forecasts, seasonal prediction and AMIP-type simulations (e.g. Fox-Rabinovitz et al. 2006). Physical parameterisations include the Kain and Fritsch (1990) deep-convection scheme, the Kuo-transient scheme for shallow convection (Kuo 1965; Bélair et al. 2005), the Sundqvist scheme for large-scale condensation (Sundqvist et al. 1989), the correlated-K scheme for solar and terrestrial radiations (Li and Barker 2005), a subgrid-scale mountain gravity-wave drag (McFarlane 1987) and low-level orographic blocking (Zadra et al. 2003), a turbulent kinetic energy closure in the planetary boundary layer and vertical diffusion (Benoit et al. 1989; Delage and Girard 1992; Delage 1997), and a weak ∇6 lateral diffusion.
Aerosols are not yet implemented in this version of the model. For CRCM5 the usual ISBA land-surface scheme of GEM has been changed for the Canadian LAnd Surface Scheme (CLASS; Verseghy 2000, 2008) in its most recent version, CLASS 3.5, that allows for a detailed representation of vegetation, land-surface types, organic soil and a flexible number of layers. For these simulations three layers are used in CLASS 3.5, with depths of 10, 25 and 375 cm. The standard CLASS distributions of sand and clay fields as well as the bare soil albedo values were replaced by data from the ECOCLIMAP database (Masson et al. 2003). An interactive lake module is implemented in CRCM5; for the simulations reported here the FLake model was used; see Martynov et al. (2010, 2012) for more details.
Several research projects have been carried out using developmental versions of CRCM5 (e.g., Takle et al. 2007; Caron et al. 2010; Caron and Jones 2011; Paquin-Ricard et al. 2010; He et al. 2010; Šeparović et al. 2011; Diaconescu et al. 2011). CORDEX, with its focal region over Africa, hence provides an opportunity to thoroughly test CRCM5 outside its “native” region, as strongly recommended by the WCRP and GEWEX.
3 Simulation configuration
A ∇6 lateral diffusion is applied to atmospheric variables with a constant chosen such as to remove 4% of the amplitude of shortest resolved scales at every time step. Off-centring in the time-averaging along the trajectory for the implicit semi-Lagrangian scheme uses weights of 0.55 and 0.45 for the future/downstream and past/upstream contributions, respectively.
The atmospheric lateral boundary conditions (LBC), as well as sea-surface temperatures (SSTs), for the CRCM5 simulations came from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) gridded reanalyses (ERA; Simmons et al. 2007, Uppala et al. 2008), available to us at a resolution of 2.0° at 6 hourly intervals on 22 pressure levels (1,000, 975, 950, 925, 900, 850, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 70, 50, 30, 20, 15 and 10 hPa). For the spin-up period (1984–1988), LBCs and SSTs came from ERA-40 reanalyses, while for the main CORDEX study period (1989–2008), the ERA-Interim data provided the driving conditions.
The simulations are compared to available observational datasets such as CRU (Climate Research Unit version 3.1 from 1901 to 2009; Mitchell and Jones 2005; Mitchell et al. 2004) and UDEL (University of Delaware version 2.01: 1901–2008; Legates and Willmott 1990a, b; Willmott et al. 1998) gridded analyses at 0.5° spatial and monthly temporal resolution, GPCP (Global Precipitation Climatology Project; Adler et al. 2003), TRMM (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission; Huffman et al. 2007), and the driving ERA-Interim reanalyses. The GPCP precipitation datasets are estimations of rainfall resulting from a combination of rain-gauge stations and satellite geostationary and low-orbit infrared, passive microwave and sounding observations; we used here the 1° daily dataset available from 1997 (Huffman et al. 2001). The TRMM dataset is based on a combination of multiple satellite-rainfall estimates and gauge analyses at a resolution of 0.25° at 3 hourly (3B42) and monthly intervals (3B43), covering the period from 1998 to present (Huffman et al. 2007); the model-simulated diurnal cycle of rainfall for several regions will be compared to those obtained from the TRMM 3B42 dataset, and the TRMM 3B43 will be used to compare the model-simulated annual cycle over selected regions and the seasonal means maps.
4.1 Seasonal mean climatology
In JAS (Fig. 2b), CRCM5 exhibit a cold bias over the East Africa Highlands, the elevated terrains of Ethiopia and Sudan, eastern Madagascar, the NW of Saudi Arabia, and over the coastal countries of the Gulf of Guinea when compared to CRU and UDEL datasets. On the other hand, the model is warmer than CRU in regions such as the Sahara, the apparent warm bias reaching up to 2° in regions such as the southern Congo basin and Oman. In fact, as can be seen when comparing with ERA-Interim reanalyses or UDEL dataset, the CRCM5 simulation has a weak cold bias over the Sahara rather than a warm bias as would imply the CRU data. We hypothesise that due to the paucity of observations over the Sahara the CRU gridded analysis misses the hottest pool, with temperatures exceeding 36° on average over northern Mali and southern Algeria according to ERA-Interim and UDEL.
In conclusion, albeit with some biases, the CRCM5 simulation succeeds in reproducing the detailed geographical distribution and seasonal variations of temperatures. As a matter of fact Sylla et al. (2010), in their simulation of the African climate using a regional climate model, found that a temperature bias of ±2° is in the range of state-of-the-art regional climate models. What constitutes the best reference dataset for simulation validation remains an open issue in regions with poor observational coverage.
During the period of high sun in austral Africa (JFM), the tropical rainbelt is at its southernmost position (Fig. 3a). The bulk of precipitation over the continent is thus mainly circumscribed to the regions south of the equator. Rainfall peaks of 8–12 mm/day are found in Mozambique, Malawi, Zambia and Gabon, but the most intense are found in the east and northwest coasts of Madagascar with more than 20 mm/day. The model simulation compares well with observational datasets. In fact for some regions it can be argued that the model-simulated precipitation may be more realistic than the 1° GPCP and even the 0.5° gridded datasets; this is the case for the Gabon, DR of Congo and Madagascar regions. This may be the result of the CRCM5 higher resolution that allows a fairly realistic description of physiographic effects such as lowlands, escarpments and plateaus that characterise these regions. For example, according to the Historical and Meteorological Data Center (HMDC) for Madagascar (NOAA Central Library, http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/data_rescue_madagascar.html), the lowlands along the southern and western coasts of Madagascar receive 400–800 mm of annual rainfall, while most of the mountainous east coast, as well as a small region in the northwest, have an annual rainfall over 2,000 mm. Precipitation in the central plateau has intermediate values: 1,000–1,500 mm according to HMDC. Being exposed to the moisture-laden trade winds, the east coast is wet for much of the year, while the rest of the island receives most of the rainfall between November and March (HMDC). CRCM5 and TRMM reproduce this pattern while the coarser mesh GPCP analysis misses it. GPCP also misses the rainfall peak in the highlands of Gabon and the DR of Congo. It must be mentioned also that in the southeast part of the domain, near the boundary, there is an overestimation of rainfall over the ocean, especially in this season. The reasons for this bias are unknown at the moment, but we hypothesize as does Nikulin et al. (2012) that this may be related to the representation of convection in the model boundary relaxation zone.
In AMJ (not shown), the tropical rainbelt begins its northward displacement and is located near the equator. This is the beginning of the rainy season for the Guinean coastal region and the first rainfall onset of the West African Monsoon (WAM). Rainfall peaks are still present over the east coast of Madagascar and the highlands regions of Gabon. The CRCM5 simulates rainfall peaks of 8–12 mm/day in the Guinea coastal region, which do not appear in GPCP.
During the boreal summer (JAS), the tropical rainbelt moves to its northernmost location (Fig. 3b) and so does the rainfall peak of the WAM, which is located around 10°N. This is the second rainfall onset of the WAM and the beginning of the rainy season for the Sahel. Precipitation is mostly confined between the equator and around 15°N; the width of the rain band is slightly narrower in the model than in all of the observation datasets, resulting in a dry bias in the Sahel and the DR of Congo as well as in the Gulf of Guinea. CRCM5 and GPCP as well as CRU and UDEL show 3 maxima of precipitation (from 8 to 12 mm/day and for some up to 24 mm/day) over the highlands of Guinea, near the Nigeria—Cameroon border and Ethiopia; the CRCM5 has higher values than the gridded analyses in those regions. TRMM shows an underestimation of rainfall in the Ethiopian Highlands region when compared to the other datasets as well as to CRCM5. In the southern hemisphere, away from the equator, the only African regions to receive non-negligible rain during this season are the east coast of Madagascar and some parts of Mozambique; in Madagascar the CRCM5 simulates a sharp line of precipitation with peak values higher than in GPCP and the other datasets, and in Mozambique all datasets fail to show any substantial precipitation at all.
In OND (not shown), the tropical rainbelt is on its journey southward and so does the spatial pattern of precipitation over the continent.
4.2 Annual cycle of precipitation
The West Africa—North region (Fig. 4a), which includes the Sahel, is characterised by a single peak of precipitation occurring in August when the monsoon reaches its farthest northward position. The peak precipitation intensity is somewhat deficient in the simulation, although simulated precipitation is somewhat excessive in the April–May period.
Over the Ethiopian Highlands region (Fig. 4c), maximum precipitation occurs around July–August. The simulation is able to reproduce accurately the gradual rise of precipitation from January to July, but the simulated peak is overestimated and precipitation is excessive till September. In the East Africa Highlands (Fig. 4f) maximum precipitation occurs around January-March; in the simulation there is a little overestimation of rainfall during the dry season and before the time of the peak. Over the South Africa—East region (Fig. 4g), the annual cycle of precipitation is similar to that of the East Africa Highlands, but weaker; the simulation successfully captures the timing and magnitude of the precipitation cycle.
4.3 Diurnal cycle of precipitation
The diurnal cycle of precipitation is another good metric for assessing the skill of climate model simulations because of the multiple dynamical, thermal and radiative processes that are associated with it (Ploshay and Lau 2010). As stated by Yang and Slingo (2001): “The simulation of the amplitude and phase of the diurnal cycle provides an ideal test bed for model parameterizations and for the representation of the interactions between the surface, the boundary layer, and the free atmosphere.”
Figure 5 shows that overall CRCM5-simulated diurnal cycle of precipitation agrees with TRMM observations in phase and amplitude, albeit with some differences from one region to another. The model does particularly well in the Central Africa North (Fig. 5d) and South (Fig. 5e) regions, although the timing of maximum rainfall in CRCM5 is somewhat earlier than observed. This difference in the time of maximum rainfall is still more pronounced in the first rainy season (AMJ) for the Central Africa—North region (not shown), in which case the simulation also gives higher rates of precipitation. Concerning the Central Africa—South region the diurnal cycle of both seasons (FMA, not shown and OND) is very similar. In the Ethiopian Highlands region (Fig. 5c) there is an overestimation of the rate of precipitation in the simulation. On the other hand, in the East Africa Highlands (Fig. 5f), there is a little overestimation of the rate of rainfall before the time of the maxima but an underestimation afterwards. This is also the case of the South Africa—East region (Fig. 5g). The timing of the simulated rainfall peak is too early for these two regions. In the West Africa South (Fig. 5b) region the peak of simulated rainfall occurs earlier than observed for the two rainy seasons (AMJ, not shown, and ASO), but the model is better in reproducing the diurnal cycle of the ASO peak although the magnitude of the rainfall peak is somewhat underestimated. On the other hand, the results for the West Africa North (Fig. 5a) region show a very good amplitude of the simulated diurnal cycle, but its timing is in advance by two to three hours.
Although the simulated diurnal cycle is not perfect, being always in advance for the timing of rainfall peak, we can say that CRCM5 reproduces the pattern of the observed diurnal cycle most of the time. In their comparison of several regional models over Africa, Nikulin et al. (2012) remarked that CRCM5 best reproduced the diurnal cycle of precipitation.
4.4 West African Monsoon climatology
The CRCM5 simulation reproduces the overall features present in the ERA-Interim analyses, but with some deficiencies. In the CRCM5 simulation, the maximum temperatures located in the Sahara (northern Mali and southern Algeria) are not high enough, but the secondary maximum located further southeast in Niger and Chad is somewhat too high. The resulting southward shift of the position of maximum surface temperature induces a southward bias in the position of the SHL, as can be seen in Fig. 7c, where the bias of mean sea-level pressure (MSLP) is shown. As a consequence, the monsoonal flow does not extend far enough to the north, and this could be the reason why the summer monsoonal rainfall in the Sahel region is much too weak in the simulation, as we shall see below.
The most striking feature when looking to the left panels of Fig. 8 is the difference in surface temperature between the model and reanalysis in this region. Compared to the analyses the simulation shows a weaker surface temperature gradient and a narrower precipitation belt that is located further south. Also noticeable is the fact that the monsoonal winds barely reach 15°N in the simulation whereas in the reanalysis they reach up to 20°N; not surprisingly, the northern precipitation isoline of 1 mm/day has a similar southward displacement bias in the simulation.
As noted before, in the simulation the Sahara is not warm enough and the warmest part is located too far south and east. As a consequence, the heat low that develops in summer over this region is displaced to the south. This implies a southward displacement of the zone of convergence of the humid and cooler south-westerly monsoonal flow with the hot and dry north-easterly Harmattan flow. As a result, the vertical ascent associated with the low-level convergence of the Harmattan and monsoonal winds is located too far south in the CRCM5 simulation with respect to the reanalysis, as can be seen in the right panel of Fig. 8. This region of shallow ascent corresponds to the shallow meridional circulation (SMC) cell from the surface to the mid-troposphere (Nicholson 2009; Thorncroft et al. 2011) associated to the Saharan Heat Low. As can be seen in Fig. 8, the maximum ascent is located north of 20°N in the reanalysis while in the simulation it is found farther south (between 15°N and 20°N).
On the other hand, the deep meridional circulation associated with the Hadley cell (Nicholson 2009; Thorncroft et al. 2011) is represented by a column of rising air centred around 10°N, but it is narrower in the simulation than in the reanalysis. This region of strong ascent is responsible for the bulk of precipitation; this is the tropical rainbelt (Nicholson 2008) and maximum rainfall coincides with maximum ascent. The dry bias of the CRCM5 simulations in the Sahel is in accordance with the southward bias in the position of the northern edge of this column of rising air, as well as the southward bias in the location of the SMC of the WAHL. However, the region of maximum ascent and rainfall in CRCM5 is collocated with that in ERA-Interim.
Finally, there is also a region of shallow ascent located around 5°N which corresponds to the coastal meridional sea-breeze circulation. This feature is less developed in the simulation than in the reanalyses, and consistently with this, the precipitation amounts simulated by the model are somewhat lower than those from GPCP at this latitude.
Above this, in the mid-troposphere and centred around 600 hPa and 14°N, there is the African Easterly Jet (AEJ). The AEJ is a key element of the WAM circulation. It results from the strong baroclinicity between the hot and dry Sahara and the colder and humid Guinea coast, through the thermal wind relationship (Burpee 1972; Cook 1999; Thorncroft and Blackburn 1999; Parker et al. 2005a, b). There is a direct link between the divergent circulation around 600–700 hPa associated with the SMC of the SHL and the existence of the AEJ (Thorncroft and Blackburn 1999; Parker et al. 2005a). When compared to ERA-Interim, the core of the AEJ is of the right strength and almost the right height, but it is displayed southward by about 2°. At the same time, the shape of the zone of monsoonal winds is not exactly the same, with the maximum westerlies being overestimated in the model by about 2 m/s and being displaced northward: it is located at 6°N in ERA and between 5°N and 11°N in the model.
Further above, in the upper troposphere, lies the Tropical Easterly Jet (TEJ) at 200 hPa and 6°N. Compared to ERA-Interim, the core of the TEJ is slightly underestimated, by about 2 m/s; its position is correct but the shape is not exactly the same as in the reanalyses. Although in general there is an acceptable agreement between the model simulation and ERA-Interim, there are some differences in the configuration of wind distribution.
Nicholson (2008, 2009) noted that the column of rising motion associated with the tropical rainbelt is bounded to the south by the axis of the upper troposphere TEJ and to the north by the axis of the mid-troposphere AEJ. They also noted that the TEJ, which is the outflow of the Asian Monsoon, exhibits little latitudinal variations from year to year over Africa. The AEJ on the other hand can migrate south or north; a northern position of the AEJ means wet summers in the Sahel (wider tropical rainbelt) and a southern position of the AEJ implies dry summers in this region (narrower tropical rainbelt). The CRCM5 simulation appears to follow the empirical relationship established by Nicholson (2009) between the column of rising motion and the axis of the two jets. In the simulation, the axis of the AEJ is positioned close to the northern limit of the column of maximum rising motion. The model southward bias for the location of the AEJ (as is also the SHL), combined to the weakness of the TEJ, is in accordance with a deficit of rainfall in the Sahel, as noted by Nicholson (2008, 2009) in her analysis of observations. The climatology of the WAM as simulated by CRCM5 resembles the “dry Sahel” mode of the interannual variability of rainfall identified by Nicholson (2009), with a narrower column of rising motion and a southern position of the AEJ.
Interestingly enough the simulation performed by Sylla et al. (2010) using another RCM over a similar domain and at similar resolution, produced biases of opposite sign to our results. In their simulation the strength of the monsoon flow was overestimated and the location of the AEJ core was too far north compared with the reanalysis. They associated the stronger monsoon flow and northward shift of the AEJ to an overestimation of the low-level temperature gradients.
5 Discussion and conclusions
The CORDEX programme with Africa as its main target region provided the impetus for testing the new, fifth-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5) outside its “native” region, as recommended by the World Climate Research Programme. The African climate represents a considerable challenge due to the complexity and diversity of interacting dynamical and physical processes, in particular those contributing to the West African Monsoon (WAM) that is of paramount importance for the population under its influence.
In a 20-year simulation driven by ERA-Interim reanalyses CRCM5 successfully reproduced the overall features of geographical and seasonal temperature distribution, with seasonal mean biases generally less than ±2° over most of the domain. The simulation also succeeded in reproducing the average distribution of precipitation and its large geographical differences, including the seasonal migration of the tropical rainbelt associated with the variations of solar declination. In particular the overall WAM is reproduced, but the simulation failed to bring the precipitation far enough north into the Sahel, which appears to be related to a weaker monsoonal flow associated to a cold bias in the Sahara. On the other hand, the simulation succeeded in reproducing fairly well the main diurnal cycle of precipitation and its geographical differences, as noted previously by Nikulin et al. (2012) in their comparison of several regional models’ simulations over Africa.
Meridional cross-sections over West Africa in summer showed a good representation of the deep upward motion associated with the Hadley cell and a good representation of location and intensity of the maximum precipitation. The low-level convergence and shallow upward motion associated with the Saharan Heat Low (SHL) is located too far south however. The African Easterly Jet (AEJ) is of the right strength and almost at the right height, but located too far to the south as a result of the displacement of the SHL.
Tests are underway to identify the underlying reasons for the cold bias in the Sahara, which are pointing towards remaining deficiencies in the attribution of surface albedo and surface emissivity over deserts. This defect may have repercussions on the simulated monsoonal flow and may in part be responsible for the summer dry bias in Sahel. The wet bias in the states of the Gulf of Guinea in summer may be related to inadequacies in the parameterisation of boundary-layer and subgrid-scale vertical transport processes.
This research was funded by the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS), the Québec’s Ministère du Développement Économique, Innovation et Exportation (MDEIE), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Hydro-Québec, the Ouranos Consortium on Regional Climatology and Adaptation to Climate Change, the Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems (MITACS) Network of Centres of Excellence, and the Canada Research Chairs programme. The calculations were made possible through an award from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) to the CLUMEQ Consortium. The authors thank Mr. Kossivi-Yéwougni Tete for producing several figures for the final manuscript, and Mr. Georges Huard and Mrs. Nadjet Labassi for maintaining an efficient and user-friendly local computing facility. The authors are also grateful to the following collaborators at Environment Canada: Mr. Michel Desgagné for his work in developing a nested version of GEM, Dr. Diana Verseghy for allowing to use the code of CLASS 3.5, and Mr. Richard Harvey for helping with CLASS. This study would not have been possible without the access to valuable datasets such as ERA-Interim, CRU, UDEL, GPCP and TRMM.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.