Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased sensitivity to glucose starvation correlates with downregulation of glycogen phosphorylase isoform PYGB in tumor cell lines resistant to 2-deoxy-d-glucose

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As tumors evolve, they upregulate glucose metabolism while also encountering intermittent periods of glucose deprivation. Here, we investigate mechanisms by which pancreatic cancer cells respond to therapeutic (2-deoxy-d-glucose, 2-DG) and physiologic (glucose starvation, GS) forms of glucose restriction.

Methods

From a tumor cell line (1420) that is unusually sensitive to 2-DG under normoxia, low (14DG2)- and high (14DG5)-dose resistant cell lines were selected and used to probe the metabolic pathways involved with their response to different forms of glucose deprivation.

Results

Muted induction of the unfolded protein response was found to correlate with resistance to 2-DG. Additionally, 14DG2 displayed reduced 2-DG uptake, while 14DG5 was cross-resistant to tunicamycin, suggesting it has enhanced ability to manage glycosylation defects. Conversely, 2-DG-resistant cell lines were more sensitive than their parental cell line to GS, which coincided with lowered levels of glycogen phosphorylase (PYGB) and reduced breakdown of glycogen to glucose in the 2-DG-resistant cell lines. Moreover, by inhibiting PYGB in the parental cell line, sensitivity to GS was increased.

Conclusions

Overall, the data demonstrate that the manner in which glucose is restricted in tumor cells, i.e., therapeutic or physiologic, leads to differential biological responses involving distinct glucose metabolic pathways. Moreover, in evolving tumors where glucose restriction occurs, the identification of PYGB as a metabolic target may have clinical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2-DG:

2-Deoxy-d-glucose

GS:

Glucose starvation

UPR:

Unfolded protein response

LLO:

Lipid-linked oligosaccharide

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

Grp78:

Glucose-regulated protein 78 kDa

PERK:

PKR-like ER kinase

CHOP:

C/EBP-homologous protein

LC3B:

Autophagy marker light chain 3

FACE:

Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis

GYS:

Glycogen synthase 1

PYGB:

Glycogen phosphorylase brain isoform

TM:

Tunicamycin

BFA:

Brefeldin A

AMPK:

AMP-activated protein kinase

CaMKKβ:

Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

ERK:

Extracellular signal-regulated kinases

SREBF1:

Sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1

SREBF2:

Sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 2

INSIG1:

Insulin-induced gene 1

INSIG2:

Insulin-induced gene 2

SCAP:

SREBF chaperone

MBTPS1:

Membrane-bound transcription factor peptidase site 1

MBTPS2:

Membrane-bound transcription factor peptidase site 2

Rapa:

Rapamycin

3-MA:

3-Methyladenine

References

  1. Chen J, Russo J (2012) Dysregulation of glucose transport, glycolysis, TCA cycle and glutaminolysis by oncogenes and tumor suppressors in cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1826:370–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dang CH (2012) Links between metabolism and cancer. Genes Dev 26:877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ying H, Kimmelman A, Lyssiotis C, Hua S, Chu G, Fletcher-Sananikone E, Locasale J, Son J, Zhang H, Coloff J, Yan H, Wang W, Chen S, Viale A, Zheng H, Paik J, Lim C, Guimaraes A, Martin E, Chang J, Hezel A, Perry S, Hu J, Gan B, Xiao Y, Asara J, Weissleder R, Wang Y, Chin L, Cantley L, DePinho R (2012) Oncogenic kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell 149:656–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Papetti M, Herman IM (2002) Mechanisms of normal and tumor-derived angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282:C947–C970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Izuishi K, Kato K, Ogura T, Kinoshita T, Esumi H (2000) Remarkable tolerance of tumor cells to nutrient deprivation: possible new biochemical target for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 60:6201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher JC, Wangpaichitr M, Savaraj N, Kurtoglu M, Lampidis TJ (2007) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 confers resistance to the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose. Mol Cancer Ther 6:732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raez LE, Papadopoulos K, Ricart AD, Chiorean EG, DiPaola RS, Stein MN, Rocha Lima CM, Schlesselman JJ, Tolba K, Langmuir VK, Kroll S, Jung DT, Kurtoglu M, Rosenblatt J, Lampidis TJ (2012) A phase I dose-escalation trial of 2-deoxy-D-glucose alone or combined with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 71:523–530

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maher JC, Krishan A, Lampidis TJ (2004) Greater cell cycle inhibition and cytotoxicity induced by 2-deoxy-D-glucose in tumor cells treated under hypoxic vs aerobic conditions. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 53:116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurtoglu M, Gao N, Shang J, Maher JC, Lehrman MA, Wangpaichitr M, Savaraj N, Lane AN, Lampidis TJ (2007) Under normoxia, 2-deoxy-D-glucose elicits cell death in select tumor types not by inhibition of glycolysis but by interfering with N-linked glycosylation. Mol Cancer Ther 6:3049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehrman MA (2006) Stimulation of N-linked glycosylation and lipid-linked oligosaccharide synthesis by stress responses in metazoan cells. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 41:51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang K, Kaufman RJ (2006) Protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum and the unfolded protein response. Handb Exp Pharmacol 172:69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee AS (2007) GRP78 induction in cancer: therapeutic and prognostic implications. Cancer Res 67:3496–3499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chakrabarti A, Chen AW, Varner JD (2011) A Review of the mammalian unfolded protein response. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:2777–2793

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zinszner H, Kuroda M, Wang X, Batchvarova N, Lightfoot RT, Remotti H, Stevens JL, Ron D (1998) CHOP is implicated in programmed cell death in response to impaired function of the endoplasmic reticulum. Genes Dev 12:982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mutlu AD, Cavallin LE, Vincent L, Chiozzini C, Eroles P, Duran EM, Asgari Z, Hooper AT, La Perle KM, Hilsher C, Gao SJ, Dittmer DP, Rafii S, Mesri EA (2007) In vivo-restricted and reversible malignancy induced by human herpesvirus-8 KSHV: a cell and animal model of virally induced Kaposi’s sarcoma. Cancer Cell 11:245

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao N, Lehrman MA (2006) Non-radioactive analysis of lipid-linked oligosaccharide compositions by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 415:3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Louzao MC, Espiña B, Vieytes MR, Vega FV, Rubiolo JA, Baba O, Terashima T, Botana LM (2008) “Fluorescent glycogen” formation with sensibility for in vivo and in vitro detection. Glycoconj J 25:503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutkowski DT, Kaufman RJ (2004) A trip to the ER: coping with stress. Trends Cell Biol 14:20–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maher JC, Savaraj N, Priebe W, Liu H, Lampidis TJ (2005) Differential sensitivity to 2-Deoxy-D-glucose between two pancreatic cell lines correlates with GLUT1 expression. Pancreas 30:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xi H, Kurtoglu M, Liu H, Wangpaichitr M, You M, Liu X, Savaraj N, Lampidis TJ (2011) 2-Deoxy-D-glucose activates autophagy via endoplasmic reticulum stress rather than ATP depletion. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67:899

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elbein AD (1984) Inhibitors of the biosynthesis and processing of N-linked oligosaccharides. CRC Crit Rev Biochem 16:21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nebenführ A, Ritzenthaler C, Robinson DG (2002) Brefeldin A: deciphering an enigmatic inhibitor of secretion. Plant Physiol 130:1102

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Henke BR, Sparks SM (2006) Glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors. Mini Rev Med Chem 6:845–857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurtoglu M, Maher JC, Lampidis TJ (2007) Differential toxic mechanisms of 2-deoxy-D-glucose versus 2-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose in hypoxic and normoxic tumor cells. Antioxid Redox Signal 9:1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Datema R, Schwarz RT (1978) Formation of 2-deoxyglucose-containing lipid linked oligosaccharides. Interference with glycosylation of glycoproteins. Eur J Biochem 90:505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Merchan JR, Kovács K, Railsback JW, Kurtoglu M, Jing Y, Piña Y, Gao N, Murray TG, Lehrman MA, Lampidis TJ (2010) Antiangiogenic activity of 2-deoxy-D-glucose. PLOS ONE 5(10):e13699. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013699

  27. Baumann H, Jahreis GP (1983) Glucose starvation leads in rat hepatoma cells to partially N-glycosylated glycoproteins including alpha 1-acid glycoproteins. Identification by endoglycolytic digestions in polyacrylamide gels. J Biol Chem 258:3942–3949

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K, Murakami S (2006) Role of the unfolded protein response in cell death. Apoptosis 11:5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fears R (1981) The contribution of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway to intermediary metabolism and cell function. Biochem J 199:1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buhaescu I, Izzedine H (2007) Mevalonate pathway: a review of clinical and therapeutical implications. Clin Biochem 40:575–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Park H, Tomida A, Sato S, Tsukumo Y, Yun J, Yamori T, Hayakawa Y, Tsuruo T, Shin-ya K (2004) Effect on tumor cells of blocking survival response to glucose deprivation. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1300–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Xi H, Barredo JC, Merchan JR, Lampidis TJ (2013) Endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by 2-deoxyglucose but not glucose starvation activates AMPK through CaMKKβ leading to autophagy. Biochem Pharmacol 85:1463–1477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mihaylova MM, Shaw RJ (2011) The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat Cell Biol 13:1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lavoie S, Allaman I, Petit JM, Do KQ, Magistretti PJ (2011) Altered glycogen metabolism in cultured astrocytes from mice with chronic glutathione deficit; relevance for neuroenergetics in schizophrenia. PLoS ONE 6

  35. Favaro E, Bensaad K, Chong M, Tennant D, Ferguson DP, Snell C, Steers G, Turley H, Li J, Günther U, Buffa F, McIntyre A, Harris A (2012) Glucose utilization via glycogen phosphorylase sustains proliferation and prevents premature senescence in cancer cells. Cell Metab 16:751–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ben-Yoseph O, Boxer PA, Ross BD (1996) Assessment of the role of the glutathione and pentose phosphate pathways in the protection of primary cerebrocortical cultures from oxidative stress. J Neurochem 66:2329–2337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schnier JB, Nishi K, Monks A, Gorin FA, Bradbury EM (2003) Inhibition of glycogen phosphorylase (GP) by CP-91,149 induces growth inhibition correlating with brain GP expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 309:126–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shaw RJ (2006) Glucose metabolism and cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:598–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gillies RJ, Robey I, Gatenby RA (2008) Causes and consequences of increased glucose metabolism of cancers. J Nucl Med 49:24S–42S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pauwels EKJ, Ribeiro MJ, Stoot JHMB, McCready VR, Bourguignon M, Mazière B (1998) FDG accumulation and tumor biology. Nucl Med Biol 25:317–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Otto Baba (Department of Hard Tissue Engineering, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing the anti-glycogen antibody. We are grateful to the following persons from University of Miami for their technical support on the following: Dr. Eli Gilboa and Dr. Mansoor Ahmed for radioactive uptake assays, Dr. Enrique Mesri for qPCR and David Siefker for fluorescent microscopy. We also want to acknowledge the following for thoughtful discussions and insights on this work: Dr. Niramol Savaraj (University of Miami), Dr. Medhi Wangpaichitr (University of Miami) and Dr. Haibin Xi (University of California Los Angeles). This work was supported by National Cancer Institute grant CA37109 and Pap Corps award to TJL and National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant GM38545 to MAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodore J. Lampidis.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

280_2013_2358_MOESM1_ESM.ppt

Figure S1. Autophagy induction does not correlate with resistance to 2-DG. a 1420, 14DG2 and 14DG5 cells were treated with the indicated doses of 2-DG for 24 h under normoxia then harvested and immunoblotting was performed to detect protein levels of Beclin and LC3B cleavage in the four cell lines. β-Actin was used as a loading control. b Cells were treated with the indicated doses of 3-MA and 2-DG for 72 h in normoxia and percent dead cells was assayed by trypan blue exclusion. The bars represent the average of triplicate samples ± SD. c Cell lines were treated with the indicated doses of rapamycin and 2-DG for 72 h in normoxia and percent dead cells was assayed by trypan blue exclusion. The bars represent the average of triplicate samples ± SD (PPT 231 kb)

280_2013_2358_MOESM2_ESM.ppt

Figure S2. Resistant cell lines not maintained with 2-DG display unique phenotypes. a Cell lines were treated with the indicated doses of 2-DG for 72 h in normoxia and percent dead cells was assayed by trypan blue exclusion. The bars represent the average of triplicate samples ± SD. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 as compared with 14DG2. b 1420, 14DG2 and 14DG5 cell lines were challenged with GS for 72 h in normoxia and percent dead cells was assayed by trypan blue exclusion. The bars represent the average of triplicate samples ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, 14DG2NM is compared to 14DG2; 14DG5NM is compared to 14DG5. c Immunoblotting was performed to detect basal protein levels of PYGB in the four cell lines. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Quantification can be seen at right of blot (PPT 200 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Philips, K.B., Kurtoglu, M., Leung, H.J. et al. Increased sensitivity to glucose starvation correlates with downregulation of glycogen phosphorylase isoform PYGB in tumor cell lines resistant to 2-deoxy-d-glucose. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73, 349–361 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-013-2358-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-013-2358-8

Keywords

Navigation