Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of 30 Breast Implant Rupture Cases

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast implants used for augmentation mammoplasty or breast reconstruction could rupture from various causes such as trauma or spontaneous failure. The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationships between the causes of implant rupture and the degree of capsular contracture, and then to evaluate the relative efficacies of specific signs on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) known to be beneficial for diagnosing the rupture. A retrospective review identified patients with prosthetic implant rupture or impending rupture treated by the senior author. The 30 cases of implant rupture available for review were classified into two groups: intracapsular and extracapsular ruptures. The 30 cases of breast implant ruptures were analyzed with respect to the clinical symptoms and signs, the causes of rupture, the degree of capsular contracture, and therapeutic plans. Among the 30 cases, 14 patients who had undergone MRI during the diagnostic period were analyzed with respect to the relationships between MRI readings and operative findings. Spontaneous rupture of membranes was most common (80%), followed by failure because of trauma (7%) and valve or implant base (4%). The symptoms during implant rupture were contour deformity, palpated masslike lesions, pain, and focal inflammation. According to the analysis of specific MRI signs, the sensitivity and specificity of the linguine sign were 87% and 100%, respectively, for intracapsular rupture. For extracapsular rupture, the sensitivity and specificity of the linguine sign were, respectively, 67% and 75%. The sensitivity and specificity of the rat-tail sign and tear drop sign were 14% and 50%, respectively.

Breast implant rupture was correlated with the degree of capsular contracture in our study. Among the various specific MRI signs used in diagnosing the rupture, the linguine sign was reliable and had a high sensitivity and specificity, especially in cases of intracapsular rupture. On the other hand, the rat-tail and tear drop signs were nonspecific signs for diagnosing the rupture of breast implant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Aim CY, Shaw WW: Definite diagnosis of breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 185:407–410, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berkel H, Birdsell DC, Jenkins H: Breast augmentation: A risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326:1649–1653, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brandon HJ, Young VL: Biodurability of retrieved silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2295–2306, 2003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown SL. Epidemiology of silicone-gel breast implant. Epidemiology 13:S34–S39, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung KC, Greenfield VH, Walters M: Decision–analysis methodology in the workup of women with suspected silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:689–695, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng LJ, Amini SB: Analysis of risk facotors associated with rupture of silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:955–963, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holmich LR, Vejborg IM, Wiik A, Friis S: Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:204–214, 2004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ikeda DM, Borofsky HB, Herfkens RJ, Glover GH: Silicone breast implant rupture: Pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance mammography and ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2054–2062, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung SH, Kook SH, Kim MS: MRI of breast implant–related complications. J Korean Radio Soc 38:1129, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peters W, Pugash R: Factors affecting the rupture of silicone-gel breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 32:449–451, 1994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roh TS, Lee HK, Shin KS: Imaging diagnosis of breast implant–related complications and the use of MRI. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 23:157–166, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steinbach BG, Hardt NS, Abbitt PL, Lanier L, Caffee HH: Breast implants, common complications, and concurrent breast disease. Radiographics 13:95–118, 1993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. William TM, Hobby JA: Immediate rupture of breast implant following trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2432–2433, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwan Chul Tark M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tark, K.C., Jeong, H.S., Roh, T.S. et al. Analysis of 30 Breast Implant Rupture Cases. Aesth Plast Surg 29, 460–469 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-0146-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-0146-x

Keywords

Navigation