Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Newer methods of wound closure such as bidirectional barbed sutures hold the potential to reduce closure time and thus overall operating room costs during total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is unclear whether these sutures have similar clinical outcomes or whether they place the patient at risk of developing wound complications that may outweigh the time-saving benefits of these sutures.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all level I trials that reported the use of barbed suture during TJA. We analyzed the efficacy, safety, major and minor complications, and overall cost related to barbed sutures.

Results

Four studies met our criteria, and included 588 patients who were randomized either to barbed suture closure (n = 290 TJAs, 268 TKAs, and 22 THAs) or to a matched conventional suture cohort (n = 298 TJAs, 279 TKAs, and 19 THA). In terms of time savings with wound closure, the barbed suture was 6.3 minutes faster than the conventional cohort (p < 0.05). The odds for developing a minor complication were nearly identical (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p = 0.95) and for major complication was not significantly different (OR 2.94, p = 0.27). The overall mean savings including both THA and TKA was USD 298 per case.

Conclusions

In randomized controlled trials, barbed sutures are consistently associated with shorter wound closure time, which also corresponds to cost savings, even when the higher cost of these sutures is taken into account. There was no significant difference in the odds of experiencing either minor or major complications between patients in whom barbed sutures versus standard sutures were used for wound closure. Current evidence supports continued use of these sutures.

Level of Evidence: Level I

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:624–630. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Doran JP, Zabinski SJ (2015) Bundled payment initiatives for Medicare and non-Medicare total joint arthroplasty patients at a community hospital: bundles in the real world. J Arthroplasty 30:353–355. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T (2006) Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2:70–72. doi:10.1007/s11420-005-0130-2

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel RM, Cayo M, Patel A, Albarillo M, Puri L (2012) Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure. Orthopedics 35:e641–e646. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120426-16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan RJ, Fick D, Yao F, Tang K, Hurworth M, Nivbrant B, Wood D (2006) A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:238–242. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.16923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vakil JJ, O’Reilly MP, Sutter EG, Mears SC, Belkoff SM, Khanuja HS (2011) Knee arthrotomy repair with a continuous barbed suture: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty 26:710–713. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Sun G, Erickson JA, Peters CL (2012) Perioperative closure-related complication rates and cost analysis of barbed suture for closure in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:125–129. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2104-7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maheshwari AV, Naziri Q, Wong A, Burko I, Mont MA, Rasquinha VJ (2015) Barbed sutures in total knee arthroplasty: are these safe, efficacious, and cost-effective? J Knee Surg 28:151–156. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1373741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marx RG, Wilson SM, Swiontkowski MF (2015) Updating the assignment of levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1–2. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.01112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, Tierney JF, Group P-ID (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA 313:1657–1665. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith EL, DiSegna ST, Shukla PY, Matzkin EG (2014) Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:283–287. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ting NT, Moric MM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR (2012) Use of knotless suture for closure of total hip and knee arthroplasties: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty 27:1783–1788. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sah AP (2015) Is there an advantage to knotless barbed suture in TKA wound closure? A randomized trial in simultaneous bilateral TKAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:2019–2027. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4157-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Demyttenaere SV, Nau P, Henn M, Beck C, Zaruby J, Primavera M, Kirsch D, Miller J, Liu JJ, Bellizzi A, Melvin WS (2009) Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure: a randomized control trial. Surg Innov 16:237–242. doi:10.1177/1553350609342988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Naki MM, Api O, Acioglu HC, Ozkan S, Kars B, Unal O (2010) Comparative study of a barbed suture, poliglecaprone and stapler in Pfannenstiel incisions performed for benign gynecological procedures: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:1473–1477. doi:10.3109/00016349.2010.516815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin JP, Hunstad JP, Polynice A, Gusenoff JA, Schoeller T, Dunn R, Walgenbach KJ, Hansen JE (2014) A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures. Aesthet Surg J 34:272–283. doi:10.1177/1090820X13519264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meena S, Gangary S, Sharma P, Chowdhury B (2015) Barbed versus standard sutures in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:1105–1110. doi:10.1007/s00590-015-1644-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eickmann T, Quane E (2010) Total knee arthroplasty closure with barbed sutures. J Knee Surg 23:163–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell AL, Patrick DA Jr, Liabaud B, Geller JA (2014) Superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:966–969. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Barney JK, Ross HL, Pelt CE, Peters CL (2014) Barbed versus standard sutures for closure in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 29:135–138. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright RC, Gillis CT, Yacoubian SV, Raven RB 3rd, Falkinstein Y, Yacoubian SV (2012) Extensor mechanism repair failure with use of bidirectional barbed suture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(1413):e1411–e1414. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.013

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA

    Robert W. Borzio, Robert Pivec, Bhaveen H. Kapadia, Julio J. Jauregui & Aditya V. Maheshwari

Authors
  1. Robert W. Borzio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Pivec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bhaveen H. Kapadia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julio J. Jauregui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aditya V. Maheshwari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya V. Maheshwari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borzio, R.W., Pivec, R., Kapadia, B.H. et al. Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 225–231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3049-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3049-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation