Carcinogenicity of deoxycholate, a secondary bile acid
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Bernstein, C., Holubec, H., Bhattacharyya, A.K. et al. Arch Toxicol (2011) 85: 863. doi:10.1007/s00204-011-0648-7
- 1k Views
High dietary fat causes increased bile acid secretion into the gastrointestinal tract and is associated with colon cancer. Since the bile acid deoxycholic acid (DOC) is suggested to be important in colon cancer etiology, this study investigated whether DOC, at a high physiologic level, could be a colon carcinogen. Addition of 0.2% DOC for 8–10 months to the diet of 18 wild-type mice induced colonic tumors in 17 mice, including 10 with cancers. Addition of the antioxidant chlorogenic acid at 0.007% to the DOC-supplemented diet significantly reduced tumor formation. These results indicate that a high fat diet in humans, associated with increased risk of colon cancer, may have its carcinogenic potential mediated through the action of bile acids, and that some dietary anti-oxidants may ameliorate this carcinogenicity.
KeywordsColon cancerDeoxycholateAdenocarcinomaChlorogenic acid
The primary cause of sporadic colorectal cancer appears to be diet, although inherited mutations and smoking are also risk factors. In human populations, colon cancer development is associated with a high fat diet (Drasar and Irving 1973; Knox 1977; Miller et al. 1983; McKeown-Eyssen and Bright-See 1984; Willett 1989; Willett et al. 1990; Hursting et al. 1990; Butler et al. 2009). When a high fat diet is fed to cancer prone Apcmin/+ mice, a significant increase in intestinal tumors is observed (Wasan et al. 1997). A Western-style diet containing a high level of lipids and a low level of calcium and vitamin D induces colonic tumors in normal mice (Newmark et al. 2001, 2009; Yang et al. 2008). These studies implicate dietary fat in the etiology of human colorectal cancer. However, it should be noted that the type of fat is also important, as omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are reported to decrease colon cancer incidence (La Vecchia 2009; Tavani et al. 2003).
The bile acids deoxycholic acid (DOC) and lithocholic acid are increased in the colonic contents of humans in response to a high fat diet (Reddy et al. 1980). The increase in these bile acids presumably reflects increased deposition of bile acids in the gastrointestinal tract in order to emulsify the increased level of dietary fat. In populations with a high incidence of colorectal cancer, fecal concentrations of bile acids are increased (Hill 1990; Cheah 1990; Hill et al. 1982; Crowther et al. 1976; Reddy and Wynder 1973; Reddy et al. 1978; Jensen et al. 1982), suggesting that increased exposure of the colonic lumen to high levels of bile acids plays a role in the natural course of development of colon cancer. In addition, Bayerdorffer et al. (1995) reported a positive association between DOC in the serum and colorectal adenomas, the precursors of colorectal cancer, further indicating a pathogenic role of DOC in colonic carcinogenesis. The hydrophobic bile acids, DOC and lithocholic acid, appear to be the most significant bile acids with respect to human colorectal cancer (Hill 1990).
Numerous studies have shown that DOC induces apoptosis in colon cells in short-term cultures (Fig. 1) (e.g. Washo-Stultz et al. 1999; Longpre and Loo 2008; Booth and Bilton 1998; Glinghammar et al. 2002; Sakamoto et al. 2007; Payne et al. 1995; Garewal et al. 1996; Bernstein et al. 1999, 2002). Induction of apoptosis after cells encounter DOC may protect against the survival of cells with damaged template DNA that, upon replication, might undergo mutation leading to cancer. In the long-term, however, repeated exposure of colonic epithelial cells to high physiologic concentrations of bile acids appears to select for cells that are resistant to induction of apoptosis by bile acids (Payne et al. 1995, 2007; Garewal et al. 1996; Bernstein et al. 1999, 2002) (Fig. 1). Epithelial cells of colonic origin that were grown in culture and repeatedly exposed to increasing concentrations of DOC developed resistance to apoptosis. These apoptosis-resistant cells were altered in expression in 839 out of 5,000 genes assessed by cDNA assay (Crowley-Weber et al. 2002) and in 91 of 454 proteins detected by a proteomic analysis (Bernstein et al. 2004). The autophagic survival pathway was also determined to be responsible, in part, for the observed apoptosis resistance of these cells (Fig. 1) (Payne et al. 2009). Apoptosis-resistant cells might arise in vivo through mutation (or epimutation) and clonally expand through natural selection to form a field of resistant cells (Fig. 1). Evidence for such a “field change” is the observation that expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL is increased in the colon mucosa adjacent to adenocarcinomas (Badvie et al. 2006). Also a variant of the ileal bile acid binding protein, referred to as IBABP-L, is up-regulated in colorectal cancer and is necessary for resistance of these cancer cells to hydrophobic bile acids (Fang et al. 2007), indicating that resistance to bile acid-induced apoptosis plays a role in colon carcinogenesis.
The findings briefly reviewed above suggest that frequent stimulation of bile acid deposition into the gastrointestinal tract, due to elevated dietary fats/oils, plays a key role in the induction of colonic tumors. Recently we reported that exposure of mouse colon to dietary DOC induced colitis (Bernstein et al. 2006, 2007) and sessile adenomas (Payne et al. 2010b). We also showed that dietary DOC modulated the expression of at least 95 mouse genes at the mRNA level, including genes involved in the processes of inflammation, angiogenesis, epithelial barrier function, oxidative stress, apoptosis, cell proliferation/cell cycle/DNA repair, membrane transport and the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway (Bernstein et al. 2006). In the present study, we report that DOC not only induces adenomas, but also invasive cancers. We also present evidence that dietary chlorogenic acid (high in coffee, blueberries, eggplant and apples) inhibits tumor development in mice fed the DOC-supplemented diet.
Materials and methods
Mice were maintained at the University of Arizona’s Animal Care Facility. Wild-type male B6.129PF2/J mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). All animals were raised in cages under non-sterile micro-isolator conditions and in compliance with the regulations and NIH guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
AIN93G diet components and analysis
AIN-93G mineral mix
AIN-93G vitamin mix
Histopathology and photography
The whole colon was removed, opened longitudinally, rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline, divided into 3 segments, the segments were placed flat on a Matricel membrane for orientation, photography of opened segments was performed on some segments with a Sony Cybershot 7.2 megapixel camera, segments were fixed in 10% formalin overnight at 4°C, transferred to 70% alcohol, and embedded in paraffin.
Then 4 micron tissue sections were cut and placed on a slide for histopathological assessment after staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Morphologic evaluation was performed using a brightfield microscope (Nikon E400). Representative images were captured digitally using a Sony 3CCD color videocamera and ImagePro software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).
Measurement of DOC in the feces
DOC was measured in the mixed feces of four mice on each of two diets (control, diet + DOC) after 90 days on their diets. Similar to the method described by Post et al. (2003), fecal production during a 1-day period was separated from the bedding, fecal samples were frozen at −80°C, lyophilized, and for analysis of bile acids, an aliquot of dried feces (5 mg) was used. The feces were analyzed for bile acids by a standard method used previously in the core facilities at the Arizona Cancer Center for measuring DOC in human feces (Alberts et al. 2005; Wertheim et al. 2009). The dried feces were incubated in 1 ml alkaline methanol (methanol: 1 mol/L NaOH 3:1 [vol/vol]) for 2 h at 80°C in screw-capped tubes, using added norcholic acid as an internal standard. The procedure was then continued as described (Alberts et al. 2005; Wertheim et al. 2009) using a ThermoFinnigan TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in tandem with a Surveyor LS system.
As the data was non-normally distributed, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was used to test for differences between diets.
Mice were fed either a control non-supplemented diet (diet 1), a diet supplemented with 0.2% DOC (diet 2), a diet supplemented with 0.007% chlorogenic acid (CGA) (diet 3) or a diet supplemented with both DOC and CGA (diet 4). The presence of DOC in the feces of 4 mice on the control diet and 4 mice on the diet + DOC was measured after 90 days on their diets. The level of DOC in feces from mice on the control diet was 0.3 mg DOC/g dry weight, while the level of fecal DOC for mice on the diet + DOC was 4.6 mg DOC/g dry weight.
Effect of DOC and CGA in diet on tumor and cancer development
Added to AIN93 diet
Months on diet
Number of mice
Mice with tumors (adenomas + cancers)
Mice with cancer
Number of tumors (tumor burden**)
Number of cancers (cancer burden***)
Total 17 (94%)
Total 10 (56%)
Total 29 (1.6)
Total 15 (0.83)
DOC + CGA
Total 7 (64%)
Total 2 (18%)
Total 10 (0.9)
Total 2 (0.2)
As shown in Table 2, 17 of 18 mice (94%) fed the DOC supplemented diet for 8 or 10 months developed tumors (adenomas or cancers), and of these DOC-fed mice, 10 (56%) had developed cancers. The 12 mice without any supplement to their diet had no tumors or cancers. At 8 and 10 months, there were significant differences in the number of mice with tumor development between those fed a DOC-supplemented diet and those fed no supplements (8-month Mann–Whitney U = 0.00, n1 = 12, n2 = 6, P < 0.001 two-tailed; 10-month Mann–Whitney U = 3.00, n1 = 6, n2 = 6, P = 0.005 two-tailed). Similarly, the development of cancers in DOC fed mice compared to the non-supplemented mice was clearly significant at both 8 and 10 months (8-month Mann–Whitney U = 18.00, n1 = 12, n2 = 6, P = 0.039 two-tailed; 10-month Mann–Whitney U = 6.00, n1 = 6, n2 = 6, P = 0.019 two-tailed).
When CGA at 0.007% (a level equivalent to 3 cups of coffee a day in humans (Clifford 1999)) was added along with DOC (DOC + CGA diet), the number of mice that developed tumors was significantly reduced in comparison to the mice on a diet supplemented with DOC alone at 8 months, but not at 10 months (8-month Mann–Whitney U = 24.00, n1 = 12, n2 = 6, P = 0.039 two-tailed; 10-month Mann–Whitney U = 11.50, n1 = 6, n2 = 5, P = 0.409 two-tailed). The tumor burden in the DOC-fed mice at 8 months was 1.6 times the tumor burden in the DOC + CGA-fed mice (Table 2), and the cancer burden in the DOC-fed mice at 8 months was 3 times the cancer burden in the DOC + CGA-fed mice (Table 2).
The frequency of mice with tumors was significantly higher on the DOC + CGA diet vs. no supplement at both 8 and 10 months (8-month Mann–Whitney U = 6.00, n1 = 6, n2 = 6, P = 0.019 two-tailed; 10-month Mann–Whitney U = 6.00, n1 = 5, n2 = 6, P = 0.034 two-tailed), but the frequency of mice with cancers was not significantly different at 8 or 10 months (8-month Mann–Whitney U = 15.00, n1 = 6, n2 = 6, P = 0.317 two-tailed; 10-month Mann–Whitney U = 9.00, n1 = 5, n2 = 6, P = 0.102 two-tailed).
Similarly, the frequency of mice with tumors on the DOC + CGA diet was significantly higher than the frequency of mice with tumors on the CGA diet alone at both 8 and 10 months (8-month Mann–Whitney U = 6.00, n1 = 6, n2 = 6, P = 0.019 two-tailed; 10-month Mann–Whitney U = 6.00, n1 = 5, n2 = 6, P = 0.034 two-tailed), but the frequency of mice with cancers was not significantly different at 8 or 10 months (8-month Mann–Whitney U = 15.00, n1 = 6, n2 = 6, P = 0.317 two-tailed; 10-month Mann–Whitney U = 9.00, n1 = 5, n2 = 6, P = 0.102 two-tailed).
All of the tumors in the DOC-fed mice were in the same region, the proximal colon. Furthermore, all of the tumors were sessile, and 71% of these were sessile-serrated adenomas or adenocarcinomas arising from sessile serrated adenomas. Of the 17 cancers observed (15 in the DOC fed mice, and 2 in the DOC + CGA fed mice), all appeared to arise from sessile-serrated adenomas. The adenocarcinomas were classified with regard to the extent of spread through the layers that form the wall of the colon. Fourteen (82%) of the adenocarcinomas were in category T1 (the cancer had grown through the muscularis mucosa and extended into the submucosa) (Fig. 4c), and 3 (18%) of the adenocarcinomas were T2 (the cancer had grown through the submucosa and into the muscularis propria) (Fig. 4d). All tumors were found in the colon. No tumors were observed in the small intestine.
Body weights of the mice fed the diets plus supplements (DOC, DOC + CGA, or CGA) did not differ from body weights of mice fed the non-supplemented AIN-93G diet.
Early experiments on rats showed that bile acids can act as promoters, enhancing the incidence of tumors when a potent carcinogen was also administered (Narisawa et al. 1974; Reddy et al. 1976, 1977; McSherry et al. 1989). However, in these previous rat experiments, bile acid treatment alone did not induce tumors. In the first of these studies (Narisawa et al. 1974) the bile acids lithocholic and taurodeoxycholic acid were administered intrarectally; in the second study (Reddy et al. 1976) DOC was administered intrarectally to germ free rats; in the third study (Reddy et al. 1977) cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid were administered intrarectally; and in the fourth study (McSherry et al. 1989) cholic acid was fed, but only over a 6 month period. These prior experiments differed from those reported here in several ways [i.e. rats vs. mice; intrarectal vs. dietary (oral) administration; various other bile acids vs. DOC; germ free vs. conventional rodents; 6 months vs. 8–10 months of exposure]. Thus, there is no inconsistency between these early negative results and the positive results reported here, where adding DOC to the diet of mice for 8–10 months caused development of colon cancer.
All of the tumors found in this study were in the proximal colon of the mice. In humans, however, tumors are found both in the proximal and distal regions of the colon. The level of DOC in the different regions of the human colon depends on two factors. The first factor is the continuous deconjugation and dehydroxylation (by bacteria) of the cholic acid entering from the small intestine, which forms new DOC throughout the length of the colon (Thomas et al. 2001). The second factor is the high level of absorption (about 50% overall) of DOC as it passes along all the regions of the colon (Samuel et al. 1968). In our mice, the level of DOC (from the diet of our diet + DOC fed mice) is already high in the proximal region of the colon. Conversion of cholic acid to DOC would be relatively insignificant for these mice since about 90% of the DOC in the colons of our mice fed diet + DOC comes from the added DOC in the diet. Presumably, there is similar absorption of DOC from all regions of the colon in mice, as occurs in humans. Thus, there should be higher levels of DOC in the proximal colons of our mice compared to the levels of DOC in their distal colons. In our mice, much of the DOC would be absorbed as it travels down the length of the mouse colon. If tumors are caused by interaction of relatively high levels of DOC with colonic epithelial cells, then it is likely that, in our system, most tumors would occur in the proximal colons of the mice, while in humans, with a more even distribution of DOC along the colon, tumors would occur in both the proximal and distal regions of the colon.
All the tumors we observed were of the sessile type, and most were sessile-serrated. In humans, about 9% of colonic tumors found by colonoscopy are sessile-serrated adenomas (Spring et al. 2006). Patients with a sessile-serrated adenoma were estimated to develop a subsequent adenocarcinoma at a rate of 5.3%, compared with a rate of 2.2% for conventional adenoma patients (Noffsinger 2009).
The dietary level of DOC used in this study (0.2%) to induce colon adenomas and colonic adenocarcinomas produced a level of DOC in dried feces, after 90 days on diet + DOC, of 4.6 mg DOC/g dry weight, while the level of DOC in dried feces from mice on the control diet for 90 days was 0.3 mg DOC/g dry weight.
For humans on a non-controlled omnivorous diet the level of DOC in the feces varies from 2.3 mg/g dry weight to 4.1 mg/g dry weight with a mean of 3.2 mg/g dry weight (Reddy et al. 1998). Two different experimental high fat diets in humans raised levels of DOC in the feces by approximately a factor of 2, compared to humans eating a non-intervention diet (Reddy et al. 1980; Stadler et al. 1988). Thus, a high fat human diet would subject humans to colonic exposure to DOC at an average value in their feces of 2 × 3.2 mg/g = 6.4 mg/g dry weight, a level that is similar to the level of colonic exposure to DOC in our mice fed a DOC-supplemented diet (4.6 mg DOC/g dry weight in their feces). These levels of DOC in the feces of humans and mice were evaluated by use of a mass spectrometer. Such evaluations do not discriminate between conjugated and non-conjugated bile acid concentrations, and thus could overestimate the total amount of non-conjugated DOC in the feces. However, as shown by Reddy et al. (1998), conjugated bile acids were 0.75 mg/g dry weight in omnivores while free bile acids were 7.48 mg/g dry weight. Since conjugated bile acids are only a small fraction of the total bile acids in the colon [0.75/(7.48 + 0.75) = 0.09] our comparison of the level of DOC in the feces of humans and mice is not significantly changed.
Both of the experimental high fat human diets specified consumption of about 120 g (4.3 oz) per day of fat, either from whole milk products and beef (Reddy et al. 1980) or from corn oil (Stadler et al. 1988). This is comparable to the daily fat consumption of present-day Americans who consume at the high end of the spectrum of high-fat diets [this could be over 150 grams (5.3 oz) of fat per day]. Such individuals would likely be exposed to increased levels of DOC in their colons, comparable to the levels to which our DOC-fed mice were exposed.
DOC is a natural endogenous agent increased in the colonic contents of humans in response to a high fat diet. Our results show that DOC can act as a carcinogen. These findings mesh with a substantial body of epidemiological findings, as well as experimental evidence at the cellular level, which also indicate that bile acids have a major etiologic role in colon cancer in humans (reviewed in the Introduction, above, and more extensively in Jenkins et al. 2006; Bernstein et al. 2005, 2009).
The finding that chlorogenic acid, added to the DOC-supplemented diet of 11 mice, significantly reduced tumor development suggests that chlorogenic acid may prove to be effective in inhibiting tumor development in humans. Such a potential effect is also suggested by the finding for humans, in two large prospective cohort studies, of an approximately twofold lower risk of rectal cancer associated with regular consumption of decaffeinated coffee (Michels et al. 2006). Coffee has a high level of chlorogenic acid (Clifford 1999; Mattila and Kumpulainen 2002). Chlorogenic acid has antioxidant activity in vitro and consumption of blueberries high in chlorogenic acid, increased plasma antioxidant capacity by 15% (Fernandez-Panchon et al. 2008). Further, chlorogenic acid protects DNA against oxidative damage in vitro (Tang and Liu 2008). Chlorogenic acid does not confer chemoprotection against azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in mice (Park et al. 2010). Thus it appears that chlorogenic acid is protective in the likely naturally occurring DOC-induced pathway to colon cancer, but not in the azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis pathway, which may not be similar to the natural pathway. Overall, our findings suggest that bile acids, at the high physiologic levels and long-term exposures associated with a high fat Western diet, may act as carcinogens in the development of colon cancer in humans, and that chlorogenic acid may ameliorate this effect.
We wish to thank Gillian Paine, of the Arizona Cancer Center Experimental Mouse Shared Service Facility for overseeing the mouse experiments and Karen Blohm-Mangone for maintaining the mice. We also thank Andrea Grantham for cutting the tissue sections and the H&E staining. Supported in part by NIH 5 RO1 CA119087; Arizona Biomedical Research Commission Grant #0803; Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, VA Merit Review Grant 0142 of the Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System; and Biomedical Diagnostics and Research, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.