Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A copula–GARCH model for macro asset allocation of a portfolio with commodities

An out-of-sample analysis

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many authors have suggested that the mean-variance criterion, conceived by Markowitz (The Journal of Finance 7(1):77–91, 1952), is not optimal for asset allocation, because the investor expected utility function is better proxied by a function that uses higher moments and because returns are distributed in a non-Normal way, being asymmetric and/or leptokurtic, so the mean-variance criterion cannot correctly proxy the expected utility with non-Normal returns. In Riccetti (The use of copulas in asset allocation: when and how a copula model can be useful? LAP Lambert, Saarbrücken 2010), a copula–GARCH model is applied and it is found that copulas are not useful for choosing among stock indices, but can be useful in a macro asset allocation model, that is, for choosing stock and bond composition of portfolios. In this paper I apply that copula–GARCH model for the macro asset allocation of portfolios containing a commodity component. I find that the copula model appears to be useful and better than the mean-variance one for the macro asset allocation also in presence of a commodity index, even if it is not better than GARCH models on independent univariate series, probably because of the low correlation of the commodity index returns to the stock, the bond and the exchange rate returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aas K, Czado C, Frigessi A, Bakken H (2007) Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur Math Econ 4(2): 182–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Abanomey W, Mathur I (1999) The hedging benefits of commodity futures in international portfolio diversification. J Altern Invest 2(3): 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amenc N, Martellini L, Ziemann V (2009) Inflation-hedging properties of real assets and implications for asset–liability management decisions. J Portfolio Manag 35(4): 94–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T (2008) Real assets inflation protection solutions with exchange-traded products. ETFs Index 1: 14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang A, Bekaert G (2002) International asset allocation with regime shifts. Rev Financ Stud 15(4): 1137–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti F (1967) Risk and the required return on equity. J Finance 22: 19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford T, Cooke R (2001) Probability density decomposition for conditionally dependent random variables modeled by vines. Ann Math Artif Intell 32: 245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford T, Cooke R (2002) Vines: a new graphical model for dependent random variables. Ann Stat 30: 1031–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg D (2008) Copula goodness-of-fit testing: an overview and power comparison, working paper, University of Oslo and The Norwegian Computing Center

  • Berg D, Aas K (2007) Model for construction of multivariate dependence, technical report, working paper, Norwegian Computing Center

  • Bodie Z (1983) Commodity futures as a hedge against inflation. J Portfolio Manag 9: 12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciol A, Miniaci R (2008) Household portfolios and implicit risk aversion, working paper

  • Büyüksahin B, Haigh M, Robe M (2010) Commodities and equities: ever a ‘market of one’?. J Altern Invest 12(3): 76–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong J, Miffre J (2010) Conditional correlation and volatility in commodity futures and traditional asset markets. J Altern Invest 12(3): 61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover C, Jensen G, Johnson R, Mercer J (2010) Is now the time to add commodities to your portfolio?. Financ Anal J 61(1): 57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster N, Artigas J (2010) Gold: inflation hedge and long-term strategic asset. J Wealth Manag 13(2): 69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar R (2002) Nonlinear pricing kernels, kurtosis preferences, and evidence from the cross section of equity returns. J Finance 57: 369–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts P, Lindskog F, McNeil A (2003) Modelling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management. In: Rachev ST (ed) Handbook of heavy tailed distributions in finance. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts P, Frey R, McNeil A (2005) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot K (1995) Hedging portfolios with real assets. J Portfolio Manag 18: 60–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Rémillard B (2004) Tests of independence and randomness based on the empirical copula process. Test 13: 335–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Rémillard B (2008) Validity of the parametric bootstrap for goodness-of-fit testing in semiparametric models. Ann Inst H Poincaré Probab Stat 44(6):1096–1127

    Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Rémillard B, Beaudoin D (2009) Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: a review and a power study. Insur Math Econ 44: 199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G, Rouwenhorst K (2006) Facts and fantasies about commodity futures. Financ Anal J 62: 47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haff I, Aas K, Frigessi A (2009) On the simplified pair-copula construction: simply useful or too simplistic?, working paper

  • Halpern P, Warsager R (1998) The performance of energy and non-energy based commodity investment vehicles in periods of inflation. J Altern Invest 1(1): 75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey C, Siddique A (2000) Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. J Finance 55(3): 1263–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen A, Valdesogo A (2008) Asymmetric capm dependence for large dimensions: the canonical vine autoregressive model, working paper

  • Ignatieva K, Platen E (2010) Modelling co-movements and tail dependency in the international stock market via copulae. Asia Pacific Financ Mark 17: 261–302. doi:10.1007/s10690-010-9116-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin S, Landa D (1987) Real estate, futures, and gold as portfolio assets. J Portfolio Manag 14: 29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen G, Johnson R, Mercer J (2000) Efficient use of commodity futures in diversified portfolios. J Futur Mark 20: 489–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen G, Johnson R, Mercer J (2002) Tactical asset allocation and commodity futures. J Portfolio Manag 28(4): 100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jondeau E, Rockinger M (2003) Conditional volatility, skewness, and kurtosis: existence, persistence and comovements. J Econ Dyn Control (Elsevier) 27: 1699–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondeau E, Rockinger M (2006a) The Copula–GARCH model of conditional dependencies: an international stock market application. J Int Money Finance (Elsevier) 25: 827–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondeau E, Rockinger M (2006b) Optimal portfolio allocation under higher moments. Eur Financ Manag 12(1): 29–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus A, Litzenberger R (1976) Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. J Finance 31(4): 1085–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurowicka D, Cooke R (2006) Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1963) The variation of certain speculative prices. J Bus 36: 394–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1): 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzilli P, Maister D (2006) Exchange-traded funds six ETFs provide exposure to commodity markets. ETFs Index 1: 26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil A (2007) Sampling nested archimedean copulas. J Stat Comput Simul 4: 339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Morana C (2009) Realized betas and the cross-section of expected returns. Appl Financ Econ 19: 1371–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton (2004) On the out-of-sample importance of skewness and asymmetric dependence for asset allocation. J Financ Econom 2(1): 130–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachev S, Kim Y, Bianchi M, Fabozzi F (2011) Financial models with Lévy processes and volatility clustering. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riccetti L (2010) The use of copulas in asset allocation: when and how a copula model can be useful? LAP Lambert, Saarbrücken

  • Scott R, Horvath P (1980) On the direction of preference for moments of higher order than the variance. J Finance XXXV(4): 915–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simkowitz M, Beedles W (1978) Diversification in a three moment world. J Financ Quant Anal 13:927–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Inst Statist Univ Paris 8: 229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Rachev S, Stoyanov S, Fabozzi F (2008) Multivariate skewed student’s t copula in the analysis of nonlinear and asymmetric dependence in the German equity market. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econom 12(2):article 3

  • Sun W, Rachev S, Fabozzi F, Kalev P (2009) A new approach to modeling co-movement of international equity markets: evidence of unconditional copula-based simulation of tail dependence. Empir Econ 36(1): 201–229. doi:10.1007/s00181-008-0192-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan N (2004) Sampling from archimedean copulas. Quant Finance 4: 339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Economics Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, P.le Martelli 8, 60121, Ancona, Italy

    Luca Riccetti

Authors
  1. Luca Riccetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Riccetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riccetti, L. A copula–GARCH model for macro asset allocation of a portfolio with commodities. Empir Econ 44, 1315–1336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0577-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0577-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation