Skip to main content
Log in

No difference in clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty between patellar eversion and non-eversion

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Multiple surgical techniques in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with clinical differences. However, whether patellar eversion impairs clinical outcomes remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide current understanding on this topic.

Methods

A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing patellar eversion with patellar non-eversion (PN). Two authors independently selected the studies, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data.

Results

Five RCTs involving 379 knees were included. The results revealed no significant differences in functional scores, pain, quality of life, quadriceps strength, patellar height, alignment, or complication rate between patellar eversion and PN. Power analysis showed that the power of the individual study and meta-analysis ranged from 5.0 to 70.8 %, with the exception of the power of alignment and patellar height in two of the individual studies, which was 100.0 and 99.9 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Based on the current evidence, patellar eversion during TKA could not definitely lead to inferior postoperative outcomes. Patellar eversion and patellar non-eversion could achieve similar clinical outcomes.

Level of evidence

Systematic review and meta-analysis, Level I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnout N, Victor J, Cleppe H, Soenen M, Van Damme G, Bellemans J (2009) Avoidance of patellar eversion improves range of motion after total knee replacement: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(10):1206–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, Sensi L (2005) Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:82–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, Kester MA (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):217–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):26–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, McGrath MS, Mont MA (2010) Surgical techniques for minimally invasive exposures for total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 59:83–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):57–63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP (2001) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 16(6):740–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang WW, Su H, He L, Zhao KF, Wu JL, Xu ZW (2010) Association between transforming growth factor-beta1 T869C polymorphism and rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49(4):652–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalury DF, Mulliken BD, Adams MJ, Lewis C, Sauder RR, Bushey JA (2009) Early recovery after total knee arthroplasty performed with and without patellar eversion and tibial translation. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(6):1339–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Du H, Tang H, Gu JM, Zhou YX (2014) Patient satisfaction after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a functional specific analysis. Knee 21(4):866–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1149–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Floren M, Davis J, Peterson MG, Laskin RS (2007) A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org

  16. Jenkins D, Rodriguez J, Ranawat A, Alexiades M, Deshmukh A, Fukunaga T, Greiz M, Rathod P, McHugh M (2014) A randomized, controlled, prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(10):851–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamei G, Murakami Y, Kazusa H, Hachisuka S, Inoue H, Nobutou H, Nishida K, Mochizuki Y, Ochi M (2011) Is patella eversion during total knee arthroplasty crucial for gap adjustment and soft-tissue balancing? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):287–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Longo UG, Maffulli N (2009) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Clin North Am 40(4):479–489 viii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu ZT, Fu PL, Wu HS, Zhu Y (2012) Patellar reshaping versus resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty—results of a randomized prospective trial at a minimum of 7 years’ follow-up. Knee 19(3):198–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Luring C, Hufner T, Kendoff D, Perlick L, Bathis H, Grifka J, Krettek C (2006) Eversion or subluxation of patella in soft tissue balancing of total knee arthroplasty? Results of a cadaver experiment. Knee 13(1):15–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Majima T, Nishiike O, Sawaguchi N, Susuda K, Minami A (2011) Patella eversion reduces early knee range of motion and muscle torque recovery after total knee arthroplasty: comparison between minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis 2011:854651

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Meftah M, Jhurani A, Bhat JA, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS (2012) The effect of patellar replacement technique on patellofemoral complications and anterior knee pain. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1075–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mizuguchi T, Kawamoto M, Meguro M, Shibata T, Nakamura Y, Kimura Y, Furuhata T, Sonoda T, Hirata K (2011) Laparoscopic hepatectomy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and power analysis. Surg Today 41(1):39–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muncer S, Taylor S, Craigie M (2002) Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 38(3):274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:94–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reid MJ, Booth G, Khan RJ, Janes G (2014) Patellar eversion during total knee replacement: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(3):207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ritter MA (2009) The Anatomical Graduated Component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(6):745–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryan JA, Meyers KN, Dibenedetto P, Wright TM, Haas SB (2010) Failure of the patellar tendon with the patella everted versus noneverted in a matched-pair cadaver model. HSS J 6(2):134–137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma V, Tsailas PG, Maheshwari AV, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS (2008) Does patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty cause patella baja? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(11):2763–2768

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith TO, King JJ, Hing CB (2012) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes following minimally invasive to conventional exposure for total knee arthroplasty. Knee 19(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Suda AJ, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG, Krueger M, Clarius M (2010) Are patients’ expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics 33(2):76–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Umrani SP, Cho KY, Kim KI (2013) Patellar eversion does not adversely affect quadriceps recovery following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28(4):591–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Walter F, Haynes MB, Markel DC (2007) A randomized prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on the early functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(4):509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang D, Zhai JX, Zhang LM, Liu DW (2014) Null genotype of GSTT1 contributes to increased Parkinson’s disease risk in Caucasians: evidence from a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep Aug 3. [Epub ahead of print]

  35. Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID (2007) Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? Knee 14(6):417–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, Bettinson K, Lingard E (2008) Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(9):1172–1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu SZ, Lin XJ, Tong X, Wang XW (2014) Minimally invasive midvastus versus standard parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 9(5):e95311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yoon JR, Oh KJ, Wang JH, Yang JH (2014) Does patella position influence ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2879-7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dike Ruan.

Additional information

Zhiwei Jia, Chun Chen have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, Z., Chen, C., Wu, Y. et al. No difference in clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty between patellar eversion and non-eversion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 141–147 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3351-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3351-4

Keywords

Navigation