Skip to main content
Log in

Role of gracilis harvesting in four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Weakness in knee flexion following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the key issues in the treatment of an ACL tear. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare clinical outcome measures of ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus autograft (ST) versus semitendinosus + gracilis (ST/G) reconstructive techniques.

Methods

In a double-blind randomized clinical study, 19 patients with an ACL tear underwent either ST (59) or ST/G (61) and observed for 1 year. Both patients and the final examiner were unaware as to the type of graft received. Patients were evaluated according to subjective criteria, functional assessment tests, knee isometric torques, knee laxity using KT-2000 and knee range of motion.

Results

The study included 21 (17.6 %) female and 99 (82.4 %) male patients with a mean age of 29.9 ± 7.8 in the ST group and 32.4 ± 6.3 in the ST/G group. There were no significant differences found in surgical complications; IKD; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; Lysholm; strength of the knee isometric flexors; and flexion and extension loss between the two groups. At the final visit, 86.9 % of ST group and 89.6 % of ST/G group had side-to-side difference of laxity <3 mm (n.s.).

Conclusions

Since anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled ST is more technically demanding than doubled STG and with there being no difference in outcomes and complications, no compulsory advice should be made on the former technique. However, gracilis harvesting may not be necessary based on the function and strength of the knee.

Level of evidence

Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2010) Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types. Arthroscopy 26(4):462–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barenius B, Webster WK, McClelland J, Feller J (2013) Hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Does gracilis tendon harvest matter? Int Orthop 37(2):207–212

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Battaglia TC, Miller MD (2005) Strength and regrowth of hamstring tendons after hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tech Orthop 20(3):334–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colombet P, Allard M, Bousquet V, de Lavigne C, Flurin P-H, Lachaud C (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using four-strand semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts and metal interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 18(3):232–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gifstad T, Sole A, Strand T, Uppheim G, Grontvedt T, Drogset JO (2013) Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(3):576–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gobbi A (2010) Single versus double hamstring tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 18(1):15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gobbi A, Domzalski M, Pascual J, Zanazzo M (2005) Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is it necessary to sacrifice the gracilis? Arthroscopy 21(3):275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ICRS Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package (2000) The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS). http://www.cartilage.org/?pid=223

  9. Janssen RP, van der Velden MJ, Pasmans HL, Sala HA (2013) Regeneration of hamstring tendons after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):898–905

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JG, Yang SJ, Lee YS, Shim JC, Ra HJ, Choi JY (2011) The effects of hamstring harvesting on outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patients: a comparative study between hamstring-harvested and -unharvested patients. Arthroscopy 27(9):1226–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ko MS, Yang SJ, Ha JK, Choi JY, Kim JG (2012) Correlation between hamstring flexor power restoration and functional performance test: 2-year follow-up after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Knee Surg Relat Res 24(2):113–119

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leal-Blanquet J, Alentorn-Geli E, Tuneu J, Valenti JR, Maestro A (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter prospective cohort study evaluating 3 different grafts using same bone drilling method. Clin J Sport Med 21(4):294–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li RC, Jasiewicz JM, Middleton J, Condie P, Barriskill A, Hebnes H, Purcell B (2006) The development, validity, and reliability of a manual muscle testing device with integrated limb position sensors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(3):411–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mardani-Kivi M, Madadi F, Keyhani S, Karimi-Mobarake M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K (2012) Antero-medial portal vs. transtibial techniques for drilling femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring tendon: a cross-sectional study with 1-year follow-up. Med Sci Monit 18(11):CR674–CR679

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, Kitaguchi T, Tagami M, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Hamada M, Shino K (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18(6):598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolaou VS, Efstathopoulos N, Wredmark T (2007) Hamstring tendons regeneration after ACL reconstruction: an overview. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(2):153–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sajovic M, Strahovnik A, Dernovsek MZ, Skaza K (2011) Quality of life and clinical outcome comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2161–2169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 7(3):e1000251

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yosmaoglu HB, Baltaci G, Ozer H, Atay A (2011) Effects of additional gracilis tendon harvest on muscle torque, motor coordination, and knee laxity in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1287–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP (2006) Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1060–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Mardani-Kivi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karimi-Mobarakeh, M., Mardani-Kivi, M., Mortazavi, A. et al. Role of gracilis harvesting in four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 1086–1091 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2890-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2890-z

Keywords

Navigation