Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mobile-bearing prosthesis and intraoperative gap balancing are not predictors of superior knee flexion: a prospective randomized study

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Range of motion is a crucial measure of the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Gap balancing technique and mobile-bearing prosthesis can improve postoperative range of motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that are predictive of the postoperative range of motion.

Methods

A total of 94 knees with varus osteoarthritis were prospectively randomized to receive either a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing or a posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing prosthesis. All preoperative and postoperative protocols and operative techniques were identical in the two groups. Extension and flexion joint gaps were measured using a tensor device during the operation. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the best predictors of the knee flexion angle 2 years after the operation. The independent variables were type of prosthesis (mobile-bearing or fixed-bearing), difference between flexion and extension joint gaps (mm), age, gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative and intraoperative knee flexion angles, change in posterior condylar offset, and posterior tilt of the tibial plateau.

Results

The mean difference between flexion and extension joint gaps was 0.8 ± 1.3 (mean ± SD) mm for mobile-bearing and 0.8 ± 1.9 mm for fixed-bearing prosthesis. The mean flexion angle for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing groups was 120 ± 16° and 116 ± 20° preoperatively (n.s.), 142 ± 9° and 141 ± 12° intraoperatively (n.s.), and 129 ± 10° and 128 ± 13° at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.773), respectively. Predictors were identified in the following three categories: (1) preoperative flexion angle, (2) intraoperative radiographic flexion angle, and (3) BMI (R = 0.603, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Mobile-bearing prosthesis and optimal gap balancing did not result in superior postoperative flexion angle. Better preoperative and intraoperative flexion angles and lower BMI were the significant predictors for better postoperative flexion angle.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, Level I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acker SM, Cockburn RA, Krevolin J et al (2011) Knee kinematics of high-flexion activities of daily living performed by male Muslims in the Middle East. J Arthroplasty 26:319–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asano H, Hoshino A, Wilton TJ (2004) Soft-tissue tension total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:558–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Jt Surg 84-B:50–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bistolfi A, Massazza G, Lee GC, Deledda D, Berchialla P, Crova M (2013) Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 116 months. J Bone Jt Surg 95-A:e83. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00327

    Google Scholar 

  5. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS et al (2001) Mobile bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 50:431–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen LB, Tan Y, Al-Aidaros M, Wang H, Wang X, Cai SH (2013) Comparison of functional performance after total knee arthroplasty using rotating platform and fixed-bearing prostheses with or without patellar resurfacing. Orthop Surg 5:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J et al (2006) A kinematic comparison of fixed-and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg 88-B:1016–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S (2007) Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:53–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Kim RH, Sharma A (2010) Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:102–107

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA (1993) Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 75-B:950–955

    Google Scholar 

  12. Higuchi H, Hatayama K, Shimizu M et al (2009) Relationship between joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different platforms. Int Orthop 33:997–1000

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott W (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Toyabe S (2011) Prediction of range of motion 2 years after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: PCL-retaining versus PCL-sacrificing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2002–2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jennings LM, Bell CI, Ingham E et al (2007) The influence of femoral condylar lift-off on the wear of artificial knee joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221:305–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Joseph J, Simpson PM, Whitehouse SL, English HW, Donnelly WJ (2013) The use of navigation to achieve soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty—a randomised clinical study. Knee. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2013.06.007

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koshino T, Tsuchiya K (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. Clinical and histological observations. Int Orthop 3:37–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim TK, Kwon SK, Kang YG, Chang CB, Seong SC (2010) Functional disabilities and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty in female Asian patients. J Arthroplasty 25:458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Jt Surg 87-A:1470–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurita M, Tomita T, Yamazaki T et al (2012) In vivo kinematics of high-flex mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty, with a new post-cam design, in deep knee bending motion. Int Orthop 36:2465–2471

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee DH, Lee DK, Shin YS, Han SB (2013) Influence of gap balance on the sagittal movement of a specific mobile bearing floating platform design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.019

    Google Scholar 

  22. Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y (2013) Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:127–133

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Kubo S et al (2009) The intra-operative joint gap in cruciate-retaining compared with posterior-stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 91-B:475–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kubo S et al (2011) Soft tissue balance measurement in minimal incision surgery compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matziolis G, Pfiel S, Wassilew G, Boenicke H, Perka C (2011) Kinematic analysis of the flexion axis for correct femoral component placement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1504–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Minoda Y, Iwaki H, Ikebuchi M, Yoshida T, Nakamura H (2012) The flexion gap preparation does not disturb the modified gap technique in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee 19:832–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC et al (2011) Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1496–1503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parsley BS, Engh GA, Dwyer KA (1992) Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 275:204–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME (2003) Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Jt Surg 85-A:1278–1285

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ritter MA, Campbell ED (1987) Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:95–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ritter MA, Stringer EA (1979) Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 143:115–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Russell RD, Huo MH, de Jong L, Jones RE (2013) Preoperative flexion does not influence postoperative flexion after rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2378-2

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sansone V, de Gama Malchèr M (2004) Mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis: a 5- to 9-year follow-up of the first 110 consecutive arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 219:678–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith H, Jan M, Mahomed NN, Davey JR, Gandhi R (2011) Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:1205–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith TO, Ejtehadi F, Nichols R et al (2010) Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:325–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tibesku CO, Daniilidis K, Vieth V et al (2011) Sagittal plane kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1488–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wen Y, Liu D, Huang Y, Li B (2011) A meta-analysis of the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1341–1350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan

    Yukihide Minoda, Hiroyoshi Iwaki, Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi, Taku Yoshida, Shigekazu Mizokawa, Maki Itokazu & Hiroaki Nakamura

Authors
  1. Yukihide Minoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroyoshi Iwaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Taku Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shigekazu Mizokawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maki Itokazu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hiroaki Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukihide Minoda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minoda, Y., Iwaki, H., Ikebuchi, M. et al. Mobile-bearing prosthesis and intraoperative gap balancing are not predictors of superior knee flexion: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 1986–1992 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2838-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2838-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation