Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of patellar height and measurement methods after valgus high tibial osteotomy

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Several controversies exist regarding the surgical difficulties and the results of total knee arthroplasty performed after failed valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and the main subject is the change in patellar height that results as patella baja or infera. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate patellar height after valgus HTO and the measurement methods that were actually used. Eighty-five knees that were subjected to valgus HTO were evaluated both preoperatively and postoperatively according to the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI), Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI), and Caton Index (CI) to assess any alteration of patellar tendon height that was present. All cases underwent closing wedge osteotomy with three staples or plate internal fixation and were allowed early range of motion. Significant decrease in mean patellar height ratios was detected according to all three indexes at 85 months of mean follow-up. The percentages of the decrease were 8.26% in ISI, 9.08% in BPI, and 6.34% in CI. Two knees showed patella infera according to ISI, one according to BPI and three according to CI. There were no significant correlations between the indexes and clinical status of the patients. Elevation of patella relative to the femur in closing wedge valgus HTO procedure due to the shortening of the segment between tibial tuberosity and joint line is normally expected. A significant decrease in patellar height according to ISI suggests that there should be patellar tendon shortening as patellar height cannot be changed. BPI and CI for determining patellar height in valgus HTO do not accurately measure the alteration of patella because they may affect the tibial inclination and antero-posterior translation of the proximal fragment. Another measuring system based on femoral reference points should be proposed to determine the exact change of patellar height in the valgus HTO procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amendola A, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Apyan PM (1989) Total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 4 Suppl:S11–S17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg 59(B):241–242

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Lerat JL, Dejour H (1982) Les rotules basses. A propos de 128 observations. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gill T, Schemitsch EH, Brick GW, Thornhill TS (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 321:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holden DL, James SL, Larson RL, Slocum DB (1988) Proximal tibial osteotomy in patients who are fifty years old or less: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 70(A):977–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Insall JN, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C (1984) High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 66(A):1040–1048

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaper BP, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, MacDonald SJ (2001) Patella infera after high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 16:168–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz MM, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW (1987) Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 69(A):225–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitson J, Weale AE, Lee AS, MacEachern AG (2001) Patellar tendon length following opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using an external fixator with particular reference to later total knee replacement. Injury 32(Suppl 4):140–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall JL, Fetto JF, Botero PM (1977) Knee ligament injuries: a standardized evaluation method. Clin Orthop 123:115–29

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM (2000) Total knee athroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A comparison study in patients who had bilateral total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 82(A):1252–1259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM (2000) Total knee athroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 375:175–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mont MA, Alexander N, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS (1994) Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Clin North Am 25:515–525

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen C, Rudan J, Simurda MA, Cooke TD (1989) High tibial osteotomy compared with high tibial and Maquet procedures in medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 245:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  16. Odenbring S, Tjornstrand B, Egund N, Hagstedt B, Hovelius L, Lindstrand A, Luxhoj T, Svanstrom A (1989) Function after tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis below aged 50 years. Acta Orthop Scand 60:527–531

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ogata K (1984) Interlocking wedge osteotomy of the proximal tibia for gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop 186:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  18. Okamoto R, Koshino T, Morii T (1993) Shortening of patellar ligament and patella baja with improvement of quadriceps muscle strength after high tibial osteotomy. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 53:21–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rudan JF, Simurda MA (1991) Valgus high tibial osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop 268:157–160

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scuderi GR, Windsor RE, Insall JN (1989) Observations on patellar height after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 71(A):245–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Staeheli JW, Cass JR, Morrey BF (1987) Condylar total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 69(A):28–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tigani D, Ferrari D, Trentani P, Barbanti-Brodano G, Trentani F (2001) Patellar height after high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 24:331–334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Toksvig-Larsen S, Magyar G, Önsten I, Ryd L, Lindstrand A (1998) Fixation of the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A matched radiostereometric study. J Bone Joint Surg 80(B):295–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weale AE, Murray DW, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1999) The length of the patellar tendon after unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 81(B):791–795

    Google Scholar 

  25. Westrich GH, Peters LE, Haas SB, Buly RL, Windsor RE (1998) Patella height after high tibial osteotomy with internal fixation and early motion. Clin Orthop 354:169–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Vince KG (1988) Technical considerations of total knee atrhroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 70(A):547–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright JM, Heavrin B, Begg M, Sakyrd G, Sterett W (2001) Observations on patellar height following opening wedge proximal tibial osteotomy. Am J Knee Surg 14:163–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayrettin Kesmezacar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kesmezacar, H., Erginer, R., Ogut, T. et al. Evaluation of patellar height and measurement methods after valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 539–544 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0572-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0572-y

Keywords

Navigation