Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the causality between female labor supply and fertility in the presence of auxiliary variables such as education, female wages, and male relative cohort size. We employ annual time series data spanning the period 1948 to 2007 for both an aggregate and an age-specific group. Our econometric specification follows closely the concepts and procedures proposed by Dufour and Renault (Econometrica 66(5):1099–1125, 1998) and Dufour et al. (J Econom 132:337–362, 2006) in that we conduct multi-horizon causality tests that allow for direct and indirect effects to take place. The sign and economic importance of our results is assessed via the estimation of impulse response functions. Our results establish bidirectional indirect causality between female labor supply and fertility and suggest interesting causal chains among the system variables. Causality effects are stronger for the age-specific group.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The system has m equations in total and β i (h) is the i th column of \(\mathit{\hat{\Pi}}^{(h)}\).
A detailed calculation procedure is given in Dufour et al. (2006) (pp. 344–346).
Notice that causal neutralization can only occur when Z is multivariate.
See also Michael (1985).
The test results were not affected qualitatively by model choice. Models A and B set β = 0, γ = 0, and θ = 0, respectively.
Dufour and Taamouti (2010) provide short run and long run causality measures for multivariate models; however, their approach accommodates only stationary VAR processes.
References
Becker GS (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In: Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Universities-N.B.E.R. conference series No. 11. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Becker GS (1981) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Bratti M, Tatsiramos K (2012) The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe. J Popul Econ 25:291–321
Butz WP, Ward MP (1979) The emergence of countercyclical fertility. Am Econ Rev 69(3): 318–328
Cheng BS (1996a) An investigation of cointegration and causality between fertility and female labor force participation. Appl Econ Lett 3(1):29–32
Cheng BS (1996b) The causal relationship between African American fertility and female labor supply: policy implications. Rev Black Polit Econ 25:77–88
Cheng BS, Hsu RC, Chu Q (1997) The causality between fertility and female labor force participation in Japan. Appl Econ Lett 4(2):113–116
Dickey DA, Fuller W (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427–431
Dolado JJ, Lütkepohl H (1996) Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems. Econom Rev 15(4):369–386
Doornik JA (2007) Object-oriented matrix programming using Ox, 3rd edn. Timberlake Consultants Press, London. www.doornik.com
Dufour JM, Renault E (1998) Short-run and long-run causality in time series: theory. Econometrica 66(5):1099–1125
Dufour JM, Pelletier D, Renault E (2006) Short run and long run causality in time series: inference. J Econom 132:337–362
Dufour JM, Taamouti A (2010) Short and long run causality measures: theory and inference. J Econom 154:42–58
Easterlin RA (1973) Relative economic status and the american fertility swing. In: Sheldon EB (ed) Family economic behavior: problems and prospects. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 170–223
EasterlinRothenberg TJ, Stock JH RA (1980) American population since 1940. In: Feldstein M (ed) The American economy in transition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 275–321
Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836
Engelhardt H, Kögel T, Prskawetz A (2004) Fertility and women’s employment reconsidered: a macro-level time-series analysis for developed countries, 1960–2000. Popul Stud 58(1):109–120
Engelhardt H, Prskawetz A (2004) On the changing correlation between fertility and female employment over space and time. Eur J Popul 20:35–62
Ermisch J (1979) The relevance of the ‘Easterlin hypothesis’ and the ‘new home economics’ to fertility movements in Great Britain. Popul Stud 33:39–58
Ermisch J (1980) Time costs, aspirations and the effect of economic growth on german fertility. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 42:125–143
Giles JA (2002) Testing for two-step Granger non-causality in trivariate VAR models. In: Ullah A, Wan AK, Chaturvedi A (eds) Handbook of applied econometrics and statistical inference. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 371–399 (Chapter 18)
Granger CWJ (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438
Hill JB (2005) Causation delays and causal neutralization up to three steps ahead: the money-output relationship revisited. Department of Economics, Florida International University. Available: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wpawuwpem/0503016.htm
Hill JB (2007) Efficient tests of long-run causation in trivariate var processes with a rolling window study of the money–income relationship. J Appl Econom 22:747–765
Hotz VJ, Klerman JA, Willis RJ (1997) The economics of fertility in developed countries. In: Rosenzweig MR, Stark O (eds) Hanbook of population and family economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 275–347
Jeon Y, Shields MP (2008) The impact of relative cohort size on U.S. fertility 1913–2001. IZA discussion paper no. 3587
Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegrating vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59:1551–1580
Johansen S (1995) Likelihood based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kilian L, Ohanian LE (1998) Is there a trend break in U.S. GNP? A macroeconomic perspective. Fed Reserve Bank Minneap Staff Rep 244
Kilian L, Ohanian LE (2002) Unit roots, trend breaks, and transitory dynamics: a macroeconomic perspective. Macroecon Dyn 6:614-632
Klijzing E, Sieger J, Keilman N, Groot L (1988) Static versus dynamic analysis of the interaction between female labour force participation and fertility. Eur J Popul 4:97–116
Kohler HP, Billari FC, Ortega JA (2002) The emergence of lowest–low fertility in Europe during the 1990’s. Popul Dev Rev 28(4):641–680
Korenman S, Neumark D (2000) Cohort crowding and youth labor markets (a cross-national analysis). In: Blanchflower DG, Freeman RB (eds)Youth employment and joblessness in advanced countries. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 57–106
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Yongcheol S (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econom 54:159–178
Lehrer E, Nerlove M (1986) Female labor force behaviour and fertility in the United States. Annu Rev Sociol 12:181–204
Lütkepohl H (1993) Testing for causation between two variables in higher dimensional VAR models. In: Schneeweiss H, Zimmermann K (eds) Studies in applied econometrics. Springer, Heidelberg
Macunovich DJ (1996a) Relative income and price of time: exploring their effects on fertility and female labor force participation. Popul Dev Rev (Supplement) 22:223–257
Macunovich DJ (1996b) A review of recent developments in the economics of fertility. In: Menchik P (ed) Household and family economics. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 91–150
Macunovich DJ (1998) Fertility and the Easterlin hypothesis: an assessment of the literature. J Popul Econ 11:53–111
Macunovich DJ (1999) The fortunes of one’s birth: relative cohort size and the youth labor market in the United States. J Popul Econ 12:215–272
McNown R (2003) A cointegration model of age-specific fertility and female labor supply in the United States. South Econ J 70(2):344–358
McNown R, Rajbhandary S (2003) Time series analysis of fertility and female labor market behavior. J Popul Econ 16:501–523
McNown R, Ridao-Cano C (2005) A time series model of fertility and female labour supply in the UK. Appl Econ 37(5):521–532
Michael RT (1985) Consequences of the rise in female labor force participation rates: questions and probes. J Labor Econ 3(1) Part 2: Trends in Women’s Work, Education, and Family Building:S117–S146
Mishra V, Smyth R (2010) Female labor force participation and total fertility rates in the OECD: new evidence from panel cointegration and Granger causality testing. J Econ Bus 62:48–64
Mishra V, Nielsen I, Smyth R (2010) On the relationship between female labour force participation and fertility in G7 countries: evidence from panel cointegration and Granger causality. Empir Econ 38:361–372
Montgomery M, Trussell J (1986) Models of marital status and childbearing. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labor economics, volume I. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6):1519–1554
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for unit roots in time series regression. Biometrika 75: 423–470
Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 66:225–250
Waldorf B, Byun P (2005) Meta-analysis of the impact of age structure on fertility. J Popul Econ 18:15–40
Willis RJ (1973) A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. J Polit Econ 81: S14–S64
Zimmermann KF (1985) Familienökonomie. Springer, Berlin
Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the detailed and constructive comments of two anonymous referees that led to substantial improvements. All remaining errors, if any, are of course ours.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Junsen Zhang
Appendix: Data sources and construction of variables
Appendix: Data sources and construction of variables
Labor force participation rate of women aged 16 years and over.
Annual data, 1948–2007, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey (CPS), http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsatabs.htm
Labor force participation rate of women aged 25–34 years old.
Annual data, 1948–2007, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey (CPS), http://www.bls.gov/data/
Fertility: total fertility rate.
Annual data, 1948–2007. Vital Statistics of the United States, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus.htm, file natfinal2003.annvol1_07.pdf for the years 1948 to 2003 and U.S Census Bureau, 2010 statistical abstract for years 2004 to 2007, http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/births_deaths_marriages_divorces/births.html , table 10s0083.xls
Median age of women at first marriage.
Annual data, 1948–2007, US Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html
Resident Population, women 25–34 years old, men 25–34 years old, men 35–55 years old.
Annual data, 1948–2007, US Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/educ-attn.html
Resident Population, males 20–29, males 35–64, US Census Bureau, International Data Base, http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/
Median income, males and females, age 15 and over (2008 dollars).
Annual data, 1948–2007, 2010 Statistical Abstract, US Census Bureau, table p08AR.xls, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/incpertoc.html
Median income, females 25–34 years old (2008 dollars), http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/incpertoc.html
Years of school completed.
Annual data, 1948–2007, US Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/educ-attn.html
Women ages 25–34 who have completed at least 1 year of college.
Education, edt, is the percentage of women ages 25–34 who have completed at least 1 year in college
where c2534t = females, 25–34 years, who have completed one or more years of college, fm2534t = females, 25–34 years (resident population). Data for the years 1948–49, 1951, 1953–56, 1958, 1961, and 1963 were calculated by linear interpolation.
Wage rate of women, 15 years and over.
where Ifem = median income of women, 15 years and over, (2008 dollars), which is divided by 1,750 h of full time work per year. This yields estimates of an hourly wage figure.
Wage rate of women, 25–34 years old.
where Ifem2534t = median income of women, 25–34 years old (2008 dollars)
Relative cohort size.
Relative cohort size is computed by dividing resident population of men aged 20–29 with resident population of men aged 35–64.
where males2029t = resident population of men aged 20–29 years old, males3564t = resident population of men aged 35–64 years old.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salamaliki, P.K., Venetis, I.A. & Giannakopoulos, N. The causal relationship between female labor supply and fertility in the USA: updated evidence via a time series multi-horizon approach. J Popul Econ 26, 109–145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0418-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0418-8