Skip to main content
Log in

Are twins’ behavioural/emotional problems different from singletons’?

  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared twins with singletons in the National Epidemiological Child Psychiatric Study, which included 122 twins and 5455 singletons, born in 1981 and selected at random. Behavioural and emotional symptoms were assessed in 1989 on the basis of questionnaires filled in by the parents (Rutter Parent Questionnaire) (RA2), teachers (Rutter Teacher Questionnaire) (RB2) and the children themselves (Children’s Depression Inventory) (CDI). Parents’ reported proportions of probable behavioural/emotional disorders did not differ between the twin and singleton girls, but among the twin boys there was a nonsignificant trend of being more often probably disturbed. Twins were reported to be less disturbed than singletons according to the teachers’ assessments. No difference was found between twins and singletons in their self-reports. When analysing parents’ reported values of various sum scores, the twin boys obtained slightly higher scores than singletons, while twin girls scored significantly lower on total and emotional disturbances. Twin boys obtained lower mean scores than singletons for probable disorder in the teachers’ evaluations, the differences arising mostly in the emotional area. The same type of trend, however nonsignificant, was found among the teachers’ evaluations of girls. No significant difference was found in the mean scores for hyperactivity. This large population-based sample suggests that twins may have a lower rate of behavioural problems in childhood than singletons, a finding that has to be taken into account in behavioural genetic studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almqvist F, Ikäheimo K, Kumpulainen K, Tuompo-Johansson E, Linna SL, Puura K, Moilanen I, Räsänen E, Tamminen T, Piha J. Design and subjects of a Finnish epidemiological study on psychiatric disorders in childhood. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 8:Suppl. 1: (this supplement)

  2. Dodd B, McEvoy S (1994) Twin language or phonological disorder. Journal of Child Language 21:273–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gau JS, Silberg JL, Erickson MT, Hewitt JK (1992) Childhood behaviour problems: a comparison of twin and non-twin samples. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 41:53–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hay DA, Collett SM, Johnston CJ, O’Brien P, Prior M (1986) Do twins and singletons have the same language and reading problems? In: Pratt C, Garton AF, Turner WE, Nesdale AR (Eds) Research Issues in Child Development. Sydney: Allen & Urwin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hay DA, Levy F, McStephen M, Rooney R (1998) Predictors of change in ADHD symptomatology in twins and their siblings: perspectives from the Australian twin ADHD project. (Abstract) Twin Research 1:92

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hay DA, O’Brien PJ (1987) Early influences on the school social adjustment of twins. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 36:239–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hay DA, O’Brien PJ, Johnston CJ, Prior M (1984) The high incidence of reading disability in twin boys and its implications for genetic analysis. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 33:223–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Levy F, Hay D, McLaughlin M, Wood C, Waldman I (1996) Twin-sibling differences in parental reports of ADHD, speech, reading and behavioural problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 37:569–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Macdonald AM, Bryan EM, Derom R, Hay D, Hebebrand J, Kirschbaum C, Kracke B, Pauls DL, Rowe DC, Rutter M (1993) Group report: what can twin studies contribute to the understanding of childhood behavioral disorders? In: Bouchard TJ, Propping P (Eds) Twins as a Tool of Behavior Genetics. Berlin: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mogford K (1988) Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances. London: Longman Group

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moilanen I (1987) Dominance and submissiveness between twins. II Consequences for mental health. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 36:257–265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moilanen I, Ebeling H (1998) To be born as a twin — risks and sequelae. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 57:138–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paluzny M, Abelson AG (1975) Twins and child psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry 13:434–436

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robin M, Casati I (1994) Are twins different from singletons during early childhood? Early Development and Parenting 3:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rutter M, Redshaw J (1991) Annotation: Growing up as a twin: twin-singleton differences in psychological development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 32:885–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rutter M, Simonoff E, Silberg J (1993) How informative are twin studies of child psychopathology? In: Bouchard TJ, Propping P (Eds) Twins as a Tool of Behaviour Genetics. Berlin: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van den Oord EJCG, Koot HM, Boomsma DI, Verhulst FC, Orlebeke JF (1995) A twin-singleton comparison of problem behaviour in 2–3-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 36:449–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Moilanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moilanen, I., Linna, S.L., Ebeling, H. et al. Are twins’ behavioural/emotional problems different from singletons’?. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 8 (Suppl 4), S62–S67 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00010702

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00010702

Key words

Navigation