Abstract
Environmental impact assessment is widely recognized as an effective tool for supporting the sustainable development of the environment through policy, plan and program decision-making processes. Traditional approach of environmental impact assessment generally focuses on scientific analysis and neglects subjective utilities on the project development. This paper proposes a framework of environmental impact assessment process by integrating subjective perception and scientific analysis. This framework suggests that environmental impacts and their consequent effects are analyzed and calculated based on the inventory analysis, but the non-market loss arising from the construction of the sensitive facility is estimated by contingent valuation method and the relative importance of affecting groups in affecting the ongoing of project development is evaluated by analytical hierarchy process. Eventually, a mathematical model is presented to determine the optimal compensation amount under a targeted refusal rate. Also, a case example is presented to illustrate this approach that integrates the objectively scientific assessment for potentially environmental impacts and individual subjective perception on the non-market value of environmental damages arising from the project development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J.; Cropper, M. L.; Eads, G. C.; Hahn, R. W.; Lave, L. B.; Noll, R. G., (1996). Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? Science, 272 (5259), 221–222 (2).
Aunan, K.; Fang, J.; Vennemo, H.; Oye, K.; Seip, H. M., (2004). Co-benefits of climate policy: Lessons learned from a study in Shanxi. Energy Policy, 32 (4), 567–581 (15).
Brown, A. L.; Therivel, R., (2000). Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 18 (3), 183–189 (7).
Burdge, R., (2003). The practice of social impact assessment-background. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 21 (2), 84–88 (5).
Gagnon, C.; Hirsch, P.; Howitt, R., (1993). Can SIA empower communities. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 13 (4), 229–253 (25).
Chen, C. C.; Huang, J. F., (2004). A study on the gap of willingness to pay between two environemtnal groups for enivornemtnal resource: A case of Chi-ku wetland, Chinese J. Environ. Educ., 10 (3), 17–36 (20). http://environ.tmue.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml
Connelly, S.; Richardson, T., (2005). Value-driven SEA: Time for an environmental justice perspective? Environ. Impact Assess., 25 (4), 391–409 (19).
Curran, J. M.; Wood, C.; Hilton, M., (1998). Environmental appraisal of UK development plans: Current practice and future directions. Environ. Plann: Plann. Des., 25 (3), 411–433 (23).
Fischer, T., (2002). Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria- the same requirements for every assessment? J. Environ. Assess: Policy Manage., 4 (1), 83–99 (16).
Gilpin, A., (1995). Environmental impact assessment (EIA): Cutting edge for the twenty-first century. Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, UK.
Hazell, S.; Benevides, H., (2000). Toward a legal framework for SEA in Canada. In: Partidario MR, Clark C, editors. Perspectives on strategic environmental assessment. Lewis, New York, USA
Healey, P., (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillian Press, London, UK.
Kørnøv, L.; Thissen W., (2000). Rationality in decision and policy-making: Implications for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 18 (3), 191–200 (10).
Lawrence, D. P., (2000). Planning theories and environmental impact assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 20 (6), 607–625 (19).
Lindhjem, H.; Hu, T.; Ma, Z.; Skjelvik, J. M.; Song, G.; Vennemo, H.; Wu, J.; Zhang, S., (2007). Environmental economic impact assessment in China: Problems and prospects. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 27 (1), 1–25 (25).
Lockie, S., (2001). SIA in review: Setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st. century. Impact Assess: Proj Apprais, 19 (4), 277–287 (11).
McDaniels, T. L., Trousdale, W., (2005). Resource compensation and negotiation support in an aboriginal context: Using community-based multi-attribute analysis to evaluate non-market losses. Ecol. Econ., 55 (2), 173–186 (14).
Mestl, H. E. S.; Aunan, K.; Fang, J.; Seip, H. M.; Skjelvik, J. M.; Vennemo, H., (2005). Cleaner production as climate investment—integrated assessment in Taiyuan City. J. Clean. Product., 13 (1), 57–70 (14).
Nitz, T.; Brown, A. L., (2000). SEA must learn how policy making works. J. Environ. Assess: Policy Manage., 3 (3), 329–492 (164).
Noble, B. F., (2000). Strategic environmental assessment: What is it and what makes it strategic? J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 2 (2), 203–224 (22).
Noble, B. F.; Storey, K., (2001). Towards a structured approach to strategic environmental assessment. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 3 (4), 483–508 (26).
Ortolano, L., (1997). Environmental regulation and impact assessment. Wiley, New York, USA.
Partidario, M. R., (1999). Strategic environmental assessment-principles and potential. In: Petts J. editor. Handbook of environmental impact assessment vol. I. London (UK): Blackwell, 60–73 (14).
Partidario, M. R., (2000). Elements of an SEA framework-improving the added-value of SEA. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 20 (6), 647–663 (17).
Ramanathan, R., (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. J. environ. manage., 63 (1), 27–35 (9).
Rashidinejad, F.; Osanloo, M.; Rezai, B., (2008). An environmental oriented model for optimum cut-off grades in open pit mining projects to minimize acid mine drainage. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5 (2), 183–194 (12).
Rauschmayer, F.; Risse, N., (2005). A framework for the selection of participatory approaches for SEA. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 25 (6), 650–666 (17).
Roudgarmi, P.; Khorasani, N.; Monavari, S. M.; Nouri, J.; (2008). Alternatives evaluation in EIA by spatial multi-criteria evaluation technique. J. Food Agr. Environ., 6 (1), 199–205 (7).
Roudgarmi, P.; Monavari, M.; Feghhi, J.; Nouri, J.; Khorasani, N., (2008). Environmental impact prediction using remote sensing images. J. Zhejiang Uni. Sci. A., 9 (3), 381–390 (10).
Saaty, T. L., (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburg: RWS Publications.
Taiwan EPA, (2007). Year book of Environmental Protection Statistics. Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration.
Tang, B.; Wong, S.; Lau, M. C., (2008). Social impact assessment and public participation in China: A case study of land requisition in Guangzhou. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 28 (1), 57–72 (16).
Vanclay, F., (2002). Conceptualising social impacts. Environ. Impact Assess. Review, 22 (3), 183–211 (29).
Vanclay, F., (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 21(1), 5–11 (7).
Verheem, R.; Tonk, J., (2000). Strategic environmental assessment: One concept, multiple forms. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais, 18 (3), 177–182 (6).
Wang, H. F., (2004). Multicriteria decision analysis, from certainty to uncertainty. Ting Long Book: Taiwan.
Woltjer, J., (2000). Consensus planning the relevance of communicative planning theory in Dutch infrastructure development. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, C.C. Environmental impact assessment framework by integrating scientific analysis and subjective perception. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6, 605–618 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326101
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326101