Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers’, school staff’s and parents’ efficacy beliefs as determinants of attitudes toward school

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self- and collective efficacy beliefs were examined as correlates of attitudes toward school of teachers, school staff, and parents. 726 teachers, 387 staff members, and 1994 parents from 18 junior high schools in Milan and Rome, Italy, were administered questionnaires assessing self-efficacy beliefs, perceptions about colleagues’ bahavior, collective efficacy beliefs, affective commitment and job satisfaction of teachers and school staff and parents satisfaction with school.

Path analyses corroborated a conceptual model in which self- and collective efficacy beliefs represent, respectively, the distal and proximal determinants of affective commitment and job satisfaction for teachers and staff and of satisfaction with school for parents. Perceptions that teachers, staff and parents hold about the behavior of their colleagues largely mediated the links between self- and collective efficacy beliefs. collective efficacy beliefs, in turn, largely mediated the influence that self-efficacy beliefs and perceptions of school constituencies’ behaviors exert on attitudes toward school of teachers, staff and parents.

Résumé

On a examiné les convictions de self et collective efficacy comme déterminants de la satisfaction dans le travail des professeurs et du personnel de l’école et la satisfaction des parents à l’égard de l’école. On a administré à 726 professeurs, à 387 membres du personnel de l’école, et à 1994 parents provenants de 18 écoles secondaire du 1er cycle de Milan et Rome (Italie), un questionnaire pour évaluer les convictions de self-efficacy, les perceptions de comportement des collègues, les convictions de collective efficacy et la satisfaction dans le travail à l’égard de l’école.

La path analysis a confirmé la validité du modèle conceptuel dans le quel les convictions de self et collective efficacy représentent, respectivement, les déterminants distaux et prochains du affective commitment et de la satisfaction dans le travail pour les professeurs et les membres du personnel, et la satisfaction avec l’école pour les parents.

Les perceptions que les professeurs, les membres du personnel et les parents ont envers le comportement de leurs collègues s’interposent largement entre les convictions de self et les convictions de collective efficacy. Les convictions de collective efficacy, à leur tour, s’interposent largement entre l’influence que les convictions de self-efficacy et le perceptions de comportement de qui travaille dans l’école exercent sur l’affective commitment et la satisfaction dans le travail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The Measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy.Current directionsin Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.Annual Review Psychol., 52, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1995).EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop,J.W., & Scott, K.D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 3, 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgogni, L. (2001). Efficacia Organizzativa (Organizational Efficacy). Milano: Guerini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G.V., & Cervone, D. (2000).Personality. Determinants, Dynamics and Potential. Cambridge University Press.

  • Caprara, G.V., Borgogni, L., Barbaranelli, C., & Rubinacci, A. (1999). Convinzioni di efficacia e cambiamento organizzativo.Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 174, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T., (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching.Journal of Experimental Educational, 60, 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranny, C.J., Smith, P.C., & Stone, E.F. (1992).Job Satisfaction. Lextington Book.

  • Earley, P.C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance.Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltz, D.L. (1988). Self-confidence and sports performance. In K.B. Pandolf (Ed.),Exercise and sport sciences reviews. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltz, D.L., & Lirgg, C.D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernàndez-Ballesteros, R., Dìez-Nicolàs,J., Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2002). Structural relation of perceived personal efficacy to perceived collective efficacy.Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R., Lawler, E.E, III, & Associates (1993).Organizing for the future: The new logic for managing complex organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M.E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resourse management.Academy of Management Review, 12, 472–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M.E. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers.Personnel Psychology, 42, 787–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R.D. (2001). Collective Efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härnqvist, K. (1978). Primary mental abilities at collective and individual level.Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 706–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R.H., & Thomas, S.L. (2000).An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, L., & Carron, A.V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance.International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. (1991). The relationship of self-efficacy appraisal to subsequent health related outcomes: A meta-analisys.Social Work in Health Care, 16, 53–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J.J. (1993).Factor analysis of multilevel data: Gauging the Muthen model. In J.H.L. Oud & R.A.W. van Blockland-Vogelsang (Eds.),Advances in longitudinal and multivariate in the behavioural sciences (chapter 10, pp. 141–156). Nijmegen, NL: ITS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iaffaldano, M.T., & Muchinsky, P.M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., Durham, C.C., & Kluger, A.N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 1, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, B.S., & Locke, E.A. (1995). The effects of goal-setting, self-efficacy, competition and personal traits on the performance of an endurance task.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 138–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B.L., & Madigan, R.M. (1997). The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams.Small Group Research, 4, 517–534, Sage Publication, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A. (Ed.) (1999).Basic Principles of organizational behavior. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, J.E. (1995).Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J.E., & Zajac, D.M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedent, correlates and consequences of Organizational Commitment.Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.P. (1997). Organizational Commitment. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.),International Review of Industrial Psychology (pp. 175–228). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment.Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurment of Organizational Commitment.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., & Lent, R.W. (1991). Relation of Self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B.O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis.Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 963–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings.Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, M.M., McGee, G.W., & Cavender, J.W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance.Academy of Management Review, 9, 4, 712–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierro, A., Lombardo, I., Fabbri, S., & Di Spirito, A. (1995). Evidenza empirica della validità delle misure di job involvement e organizational commitment: Modelli di analisi fattoriale confermativa.TPM, 2(1) 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prussia, G.E., & Kinicki, A.J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social cognitive theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Erals, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.Science, 277, 819–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D.H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J.E. Maddux (Ed.),Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281–303). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: Theoretical approaches and a new model. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.),Self efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B. (1990). Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation.Human Relations, 43, 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. (1969).The measurement of satisfaction, in Work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitude. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spink, K.S. (1990). Collective efficacy in the sport setting.International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 380–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stajkovic, A.D., & Lee, D. (2001). A meta-analysis of the relationship between collective efficacy and group performance. Submitted.

  • Stajkovic, A.D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work related performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 123, 001–020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (1990).Intermediate statistics. A modern approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, R. (1986). Relationship between self-efficacy and cognitive strategies in enhancing endurance performance.International Journal of Sport Psychology, 17, 280–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M.A., Borrill, C.S., & Unsworth, K.L. (1998). Team effectiveness in organizations. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.),International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1–47). New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S.J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective Efficacy. In J.E. Maddux (Ed.),Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment. Plenum Press: New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Vittorio Caprara.

Additional information

This research was financially supported by the Italian Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione and by the “Ministero dell‘Universita’ e delle Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica” and was made possible by the collaboration of many people.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L. et al. Teachers’, school staff’s and parents’ efficacy beliefs as determinants of attitudes toward school. Eur J Psychol Educ 18, 15–31 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173601

Key words

Navigation