Abstract
Since the 1990s many emerging countries have adopted a fixed exchange-rate peg vis-à-vis a reserve currency in order to cope with economic imbalances such as buoyant inflation, high unemployment or staggering economic growth. However, after a period of economic stabilisation and prosperity, overheating effects showed up in several countries that were often coupled with difficulties in the banking and/or the real estate sector. Sticking with a fixed peg, the likelihood of a currency crisis increased. The case of Argentina shows that even with a currency board it is difficult to restore confidence if a crisis has already been developing for several years. This article presents an economic analysis of the Argentina crisis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cf. G. Aschinger: Währungs- und Finanzkrisen—Entstehung, Analyse und Beurteilung aktueller Krisen, Verlag F. Vahlen, Munich 2001 G. Aschinger: Why do Currency Crises Arise and How Could They be Avoided?, in: Intereconomics, Vol. 36, May/June 2001, pp. 152–159; and G. Aschinger: An Economic Analysis of the East Asia Crisis, in: Intereconomics, Vol. 33, March/April 1998, pp. 55–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aschinger, G. Currency board, dollarisation or flexible exchange rates for emerging economies? Reflections on Argentina. Intereconomics 37, 110–115 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02930159
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02930159