Skip to main content
Log in

On the importance of relationship quality: The impact of ambivalence in friendships on cardiovascular functioning

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Social relationships are reliably related to rates of morbidity and mortality. One pathway by which social relationships may influence health is via the impact of relationship quality on cardiovascular reactivity during social interactions.Purpose and Method: This study examined the effects of the quality of a friendship on cardiovascular reactivity when speaking about positive or negative life events with an ambivalent or supportive friend. To examine this, 107 healthy male and female adults (and their same-sex friend) were recruited.Results: Results revealed that participants exhibited the greatest levels of systolic blood pressure reactivity when discussing a negative event with an ambivalent friend compared to a supportive friend. We also found higher resting levels of heart rate and lower respiratory sinus arrhythmia among those who brought in ambivalent friends than those who brought in supportive friends.Conclusion: Individuals may not be able to fully relax in the presence of ambivalent friends and may not benefit from support during stress. This research may help clarify the health-related consequences of differing types of social relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berkman LF: The role of social relations in health promotion.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57:245–254.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen S: Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease.Health Psychology. 1988,7:269–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE: From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium.Social Science and Medicine. 2000,51:843–857.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D: Social relationships and health.Science. 1988,241:540–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchino BN:Social Support and Physical Health: Understanding the Health Consequences of Our Relationships. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braiker HB, Kelly HH: Conflict in the development of close relationships. In Burgess RL, Huston TL (eds),Social Exchange in Developing Relationships. New York: Academic, 1979, 135–168.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Major B, Zubek JM, Cooper ML, Richards C: Mixed messages: Implications of social conflict and social support within close relationships for adjustment to a stressful life event.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997,72:1349–1363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman HS, Tucker JS, Schwartz JE, et al.: Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of longevity: The aging and death of the “Termites.”American Psychologist. 1995,50:69–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tucker JS, Friedman HS, Wingard DL, Schwartz JE: Marital history at midlife as a predictor of longevity: Alternative explanations to the protective effects of marriage.Health Psychology. 1996,15:94–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Finch JF, Okun MA, Barrera M, Zautra AJ, Reich JW: Positive and negative social ties among older adults: Measurement models and the prediction of psychological distress and well-being.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1989,17:585–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fiore J, Becker J, Coppel DB: Social network interactions: A buffer or a stress?American Journal of Community Psychology. 1983,11:423–439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Dyer CS, Shuttleworth EC: Upsetting social interactions and distress among Alzheimer’s Disease family caregivers: A replication and extension.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1988,116:825–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruehlman LS, Karoly P: With a little Flak from my friends: Development and preliminary validation of the Test of Negative Social Exchange (TENSE).Psychological Assessment. 1991,3:97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Uchino BN, Holt-Lunstad J, Uno D, Flinders JB: Heterogeneity in the social networks of young and older adults: Prediction of mental health and cardiovascular reactivity during acute stress.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2001,24:361–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coyne JC, DeLongis A: Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1986,54:454–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uchino BN, Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TW, Bloor L: Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2004,23:123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holt-Lunstad J, Uchino BN, Smith TW: Relationship quality predicts ambulatory blood pressure during social interactions.Health Psychology. 2003,22:388–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uno DF, Uchino BN, Smith TW: Relationship quality moderates the effect of social support given by close friends on cardiovascular reactivity in women.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2002,9:243–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith TW, Ruiz JM, Uchino BN: Vigilance, active coping, and cardiovascular reactivity during social interaction in young men.Health Psychology. 2000,19:382–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lepore SJ: A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In Baum A, Andersen BL (eds),Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2001, 99–116.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith TW, Ruiz JM: Psychosocial influences on the development and course of coronary heart disease: Current status and implications for research and practice.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2002,70:548–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Treiber FA, Kamarck T, Schneiderman N: Cardiovascular reactivity and development of preclinical and clinical disease states.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003,65:46–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cacioppo JT, Malarkey W, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, et al.: Heterogeneity in neuroendocrine and immune responses to brief psychological stressors as a function of autonomic cardiac activation.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57:154–164.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherwood A, Allen M, Fahrenberg J, et al.: Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Friedman E: The effects of normal and rapid speech on blood pressure.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1982,44:545–553.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pagal MD, Erdly WW, Becker J: Social networks: We get by with (and in spite of) a little help from our friends.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987,53:793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Uchino BN, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Cacioppo JT: Age-related changes in cardiovascular response as a function of a chronic stressor and social support.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992,63:839–846.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pierce GR, Sarason IG, Sarason BR: General and relationships-specific perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991,61:1028–1039.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kiesler DJ, Anchin JC, Perkins MJ, et al.:The Impact Message Inventory: Form II. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kiesler DJ, Schmidt JA, Wagner CC: A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotion and interpersonal behavior. In Plutchik R, Conte HR (eds),Circumplex Models of Personality and Emotions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997, 221–244.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Nealy JB, Smith TW, Uchino BN: Cardiovascular responses to agency and communion stressors in young women.Journal of Research in Personality. 2002,36:395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marteau TM, Bekker H: The development of a six-item short form of the state scale of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI).British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1992,31:301–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sherwood A, Allen M, Fahrenberg J, et al.: Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Uchino BN, Uno D, Holt-Lunstad J, Flinders JB: Age-related differences in cardiovascular reactivity during acute psychological stress in men and women.Journal of Gerontology. 1999,54:339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Berntson G, Quigley K, Jang J, Boysen S: An approach to artifact identification: Application to heart period data.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:586–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Neuvo Y, Cheng-Yu D, Mitra S: Interpolated finite impulse response filters.IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ASSP—32. 1984, 563–570.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Manuck SB, Kaplan JR, Clarkson TB: Behaviorally induced heart rate reactivity and atherosclerosis in Cynomolgus monkeys.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1983,45:95–108.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Light KC, Dolan CA, Davis MR, Sherwood A: Cardiovascular responses to an active coping challenge as predictors of blood pressure patterns 10 to 15 years later.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1992,54:217–230.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kamarck TW, Jennings JR, Debski TT, et al.: Reliable measures of behaviorally-evoked cardiovascular reactivity from a PC-based test battery: Results from student and community samples.Psychophysiology. 1992,29:17–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Llabre MM, Spitzer SB, Saab PG, et al.: The reliability and specificity of delta versus residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges.Psychophysiology. 1992,28:701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Benjamin LS: Facts and artifacts in using analysis of covariance to “undo” the law of initial values.Psychophysiology. 1967,4:187–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hays W:Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor S: Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization minimization hypothesis.Psychology Bulletin. 1991,110:67–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Coyne JC, DeLongis A: Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1986,54:454–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Berntson GG, Bigger JT, Eckberg DL: Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats.Psychophysiology. 1997,34:623–648.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Grossman P, Kollai M: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia, cardiac vagal tone, and respiration: Within- and between-individual relations.Psychophysiology. 1993,30:486–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT, Binkley PF, et al.: Autonomic cardiac control. III. Psychological stress and cardiac response in autonomic space as revealed by pharmacological blockades.Psychophysiology. 1994,31:599–608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG, Binkley PF, et al.: Autonomic cardiac control II: Basal response, noninvasive indices, and autonomic space as revealed by autonomic blockade.Psychophysiology. 1994,31:586–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Grossman P, Van Beek J, Wientjes C: A comparison of three quantification methods for estimation of respiratory sinus arrhythmia.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:702–714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gable SL, Reis HT, Impett EA, Asher ER: What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004,87:228–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fredrickson BL: The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.American Psychologist. 2001,56:218–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Crawford E: Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms.Psychosomatic Medicine. 2002,64:407–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG: Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates.Psychological Bulletin. 1994,115:401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rook KS: The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984,46:1097–1108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Schuster TL, Kessler RC, Aseltine RH: Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1990,18:423–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lepore SJ: Social conflict, social support, and psychological distress: Evidence of cross-domain buffering effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992,63:857–867.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Smyth JM: Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998,66:174–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Frisina PG, Borod JC, Lepore SJ: A meta-analysis of the effects of written emotional disclosure on health outcomes of clinical populations.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2004,192:629–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pargament KI: Religious methods of coping: Resources for the conservation and transformation of significance. In Shafranske EP (ed),Religion and the Clinical Practice of Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1996, 215–239.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Fingerman KL, Hay EL, Birditt KS: The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close problematic, and ambivalent social relationships.Journal of Marriage and Family. 2004,66:792–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Farr W: Influence of marriage on the mortality of the French people. In Humphreys N (ed),Vital Statistics: A Memorial Volume of Selections from Reports and Writings of William Farr. Methuen, NY: The Scarecrow Press (Original work published 1858), 1994, 438–441.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL: Marriage and health: His and hers.Psychology Bulletin. 2001,127:472–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Christenfield N, Gerin W, Linden W, et al.: Social support effects on cardiovascular reactivity: Is a stranger as effective as a friend?Psychosomatic Medicine. 1997,59:388–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julianne Holt-Lunstad Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Holt-Lunstad, J., Uchino, B.N., Smith, T.W. et al. On the importance of relationship quality: The impact of ambivalence in friendships on cardiovascular functioning. ann. behav. med. 33, 278–290 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879910

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879910

Keywords

Navigation