Skip to main content
Log in

Bungee jump model with increased stretch-prediction accuracy

  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This bungee jumping model improves the stretch prediction accuracy of prior models by including the effects of: rubber viscoelasticity, stiffness nonlinearities, jumper air drag, and jumper horizontal push-off. Bungee (bungy) cords are made from rubber, a viscoelastic material whose stiffness is a function of the number of cycles (cycle effect), the time interval since the last cycle (interval effect), strain rate, and temperature. Stiffness was measured, on an MTS machine, over 100 cycles at four intervals (1, 5, 60, 1440 min), three strain rates (0.17, 1.5, 5.0 s−1) and constant temperature (20.5°C). At a constant cycle interval and strain rate, rubber stiffness decreased 9.8% from the 10th to the 100th cycle. This decrease was linear with the logarithm of the cycle number. Stiffness recovered 6.5% after 24 hours of non-use. Neglecting viscoelastic effects causes significant stretch-prediction errors of -11.0% (cycle effect), -3.2% (interval effect), and +1.6% (strain rate). Less significantly, neglecting jumper air drag, jumper push-off, and stress-strain nonlinearities cause prediction errors of +1.9%, +0.7%, and +0.2%, respectively. These errors are based on a typical cord, of unstretched length 7.5 m, that elongates 250%. For accurate stretch prediction, with typical sized bungee cords, viscoelastic effects are both more important and easier to implement than air drag and stress-strain non-linearity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (2002) Standard test methods for rubber thread. D 2433-93; Volume 09.02, p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.P. (1996)Physical Testing of Rubber (3rd edn.). p. 149. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R.R. Jr. (1996)Mechanics of Materials. p. 101. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross R. (2000) Tension loss along a string.American Journal of Physics,68 (12), 1152–1153.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, J.P. (1952)Advanced Strength of Materials. p. 117. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, J.D. (1980)Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers (3rd edn.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freakley, P.K. & Payne, A.R. (1978)Theory and Practice of Engineering with Rubber. Applied Science Publishers, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gent, A.N. (2001)Engineering with Rubber: How to Design Rubber Components. (2nd edn.). p. 182. Hanser Gardner Publications, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerner, S.F. (1965)Fluid-Dynamic Drag: Practical Information on Aerodynamic Drag and Hydrodynamic Resistance (2nd ed.). pp. 3–14. Published by the Author, Midland Park, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. & Kott, A. (1996) The greater-than-g acceleration of a bungee jumper.The Physics Teacher,34, 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kockelman, J.W. & Hubbard, M. (2004) Bungee jumping cord design using a simple model.Sports Engineering, 7 (2), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz, P.G. (1993) The physics of bungee jumping.The Physics Teacher,31, 483–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motion Analysis Corporation (2002)EVa 7.0 Motion Analysis Reference Manual. Santa Rosa, CA, USA.

  • Mullins, L. (1969) Softening of rubber by deformation.Rubber Chemistry & Technology,42, 341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palffy-Muhoray, P. (1993) Problem and solution: acceleration during bungee-cord jumping.American Journal of Physics,61, 379 and 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A.D. (1988)Natural Rubber Science and Technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevell, R.S. (1989)Fundamentals of Flight (2nd edn.). p. 422. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidel, R.F. Jr. (1989)An Introduction to Mechanical Vibrations (3rd edn.). pp. 83–85. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Strnad, J. (1997) A simple theoretical model of a bungee jump.European Journal of Physics,18, 388–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. W. Kockelman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kockelman, J.W., Hubbard, M. Bungee jump model with increased stretch-prediction accuracy. Sports Eng 8, 159–170 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844016

Keywords

Navigation