Skip to main content
Log in

Reconsidering the pseudo-family/gang gender distinction in prison research

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the discourse used to describe experiences within those social groupings, existing within female prisons among inmates, which are generally referred to as pseudo-families among researchers. The data for this study were obtained from interviews with female inmates and correctional staff at the Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women (LCIW). Through examination of inmate and staff descriptions, the functions of these so-called pseudo-families are shown to be synonymous with those of male prison gangs. For example, the following functions of social groupings within female prisons were gleaned from the data in the current study: emotional support, economic support, vehicles for coercion and aggression, and the need for protection from intimidation and assault. We contend that pseudo-families are indeed serving the same functions that gangs serve in male prisons and that the distinction that has been drawn between these two social groupings was constructed more from our stereotypical expectations of men and women, which also have infiltrated the prison environment, than from any real distinctions. The importance of this study is that it challenges the gender bias among researchers in interpretations of male and female behavior and experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belknap, J. (2001).The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Belmont California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, L. (1981). Gendered differences in prisoner subcultures. Pp. 409–419 inWomen and crime in America, ed. L. H. Bowker. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V., & D.B. Cornish. (1985). Modeling Offender's Decisions.Crime and Justice, 6, 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBell, J. (2001). The female offender: Different not difficult.Corrections Today 63(1), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C., Wooddell, G., & Evans, R.D. (2001). Predicting symmetry in female/male crime rates.Journal Of Police And Criminal Psychology 16(2): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giallomardo, R., (1966).Society of women: A study of women's prison. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., (1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, J.M., (1988). People and folks: Gangs, crime, and the underclass in a rustbelt city. Chicago: Lake View Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. B., (1995). Gender differences in social support among inmates.Women and Criminal Justice 6(2): 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, E., (1972). Making it in prison: The square, the cool, and the life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B., (1984). Feminist theory: from margin to center. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.G., & Stearns, C.A., (1995). Gender issues in the new generation jail.The Prison Journal 75(2), 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., (1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., (2002).Hard time. Davis, Calif.: Wadsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001).Social Capital. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahan, S., (2000). Women's training for organized crime. Pp. 401–416 inIt's a crime: Women and justice. Ed. R. Muraskin. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. R., (1984).Female crime and delinquency. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J.W. (1995). From patriarchy to gender: Feminist theory, criminology and the challenge of diversity. Pp. 167–188 inInternational feminist perspectives in criminology. Ed. N. Rafter & F. Heidensohn. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet, K. (1970).Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (1978). Small St. Gabriel is a modern prison.Times Picayune (December 7): H4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.W. (1991).Going down to the barrio: Homeboys and homegirls in change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morning Advocate. (1961). Transfer of women to new St. Gabriel Prison is completed.Morning Advocate (July 1): A6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. (1998).In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women's prison. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, F. (1992).The gang as an American enterprise. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. (2002).Women, prison, & crime. Davis, Calif.: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rierden, A. (1997).The farm: Life inside a women's prison. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spergel, I. A. (1995).The youth gang problem. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2001).Prisoners in 2000. Washington, DC: Bureau Of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D., & Kassebaum, G. (1965).Women's prison: Sex and social structure. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (2002).Companions in crime. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig J. Forsyth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsyth, C.J., Evans, R.D. Reconsidering the pseudo-family/gang gender distinction in prison research. J Police Crim Psych 18, 15–23 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802604

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802604

Keywords

Navigation