Abstract
This paper presents three experiments on the parsing of Italian wh-questions that manipulate the wh-type (whovs. which-N)and the whextraction site (main clause, dependent clause with or without complementizer). The aim of these manipulations is to see whether the parser is sensitive to the type of dependencies being processed and whether the processing effects can be explained by a unique processing principle, the minimal chain principle (MCP; De Vincenzi, 1991). The results show that the parser, following the MCP, prefers structures with fewer and less complex chains. In particular: (1) There is a processing advantage for the wh-subject extractions, the structures with less complex chains; (2) there is a processing dissociation between the whoand which questions; (3) the parser respects the principle that governs the well-formedness of the empty categories (ECP).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chomsky, N. (1981).Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Chung, S. (1994).Wh-agreement and “Referentiality” in Chamorro.Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 1–44.
Cinque, G. (1992).Types of A' dependencies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.),Natural language parsing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
De Vincenzi, M. (1990). Processing ofwh-dependencies in a null-subject language: Referential and nonreferentialwhs. In B. Plunkett (Ed.),UMOP 15 Psycholinguistics (pp. 91–118), GLSA Publications. Amherst, MA.
De Vincenzi, M. (1991).Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Enc, M. (1991). The semantics of specificity.Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.
Engdahl, E. (1980).Wh-constructions in Swedish and the relevance of subjacency.North Eastern Linguistics Society, 10, 89–108, Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Fodor, J. (1994). Extraction without traces.Proceedings of WCCFL 13 (Western Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics).
Frazier, L. (1987). Processing syntactic structures: Evidence from Dutch.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–559.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93–126.
Frazier, L., & Flores D'Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap-filling in Dutch.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.Cognition, 6, 291–326.
Gibson, E. (1994). Processing empty categories: A parallel approach, inJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 381–405.
Hickok, G. (1993). Parallel parsing: Evidence from reactivation in garden-path sentences.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 239–250.
Hickok, G., & Avrutin, S. (in press). Comprehension ofwh-questions in two Broca's aphasies.Brain and Language.
Kimball, J. (1977). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language.Cognition 2, 15–47.
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
Pesetsky, D. (1987).Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In A. Ter Meulen & E. Reuland (Eds.),Representation of (in) definiteness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pickering, M., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories.Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 229–259.
Pritchett, B. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing.Language, 64, 539–576.
Read, C., Kraak, A., & Boves, L. (1980). The interpretation of ambiguouswho-questions in Dutch: The effect of intonation. In F. Zonneveldt & F. Weerman (Eds.),Linguistics in the Netherlands 1977–1979. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: The Netherlands Foris.
Rizzi, L. (1982).Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, L. (1990).Relativized minimality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sag, I. & Fodor, J. (1995). Extraction without traces.Proceedings of WCCFL 13 (Western Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics) (pp. 365–384). R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss, and M. Senturia (Eds). Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.
Sekerina, I. (1995).Ambiguity and scrambling in Russian syntactic processing. Paper presented at 8th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Tucson, Arizona-March.
Stowe, L. (1986). Parsingwh-constructions.Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 227–246.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Vincenzi, M. Syntactic analysis in sentence comprehension: Effects of dependency types and grammatical constraints. J Psycholinguist Res 25, 117–133 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708422
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708422