Skip to main content
Log in

On the equivalence between strong solvability and strict semimonotonicity for some systems involving Z-functions

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the relationship between the ‘strong’ solvability of a certain system involving a Z-function, and the strict semimonotonicity of such a function. Our main result shows that, for a system defined by a continuous, superhomogeneous Z-function, the additional condition of strict semimonotonicity is both necessary and sufficient for strong solvability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Berman and R.J. Plemmons,Nonnegative Square Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences (Academic Press, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Chander, “The non-linear input-output model,”Journal of Economic Theory 30 (1983) 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Fiedler and V. Ptak, “On matrices with nonpositive off-diagonal elements and positive principal minors,”Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 12 (1962) 382–400.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Fiedler and V. Ptak, “Some generalizations of positive definiteness and monotonicity,”Numerische Mathematik 9 (1966) 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Fujimoto, C. Herrero and A. Villar, “A sensitivity analysis in a nonlinear Leontief model,”Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 45 (1985) 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Karamardian, “The complementarity problem,”Mathematical Programming 2 (1972) 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Lahiri, “Input-output analysis with scale-dependent coefficients,”Econometrica 44 (1976) 947–962.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Lahiri and G. Pyatt, “On the solution of scale dependent input-output models,”Econometrica 48 (1980) 1827–1830.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Moré, “Classes of functions and feasibility conditions in nonlinear complementarity problems,”Mathematical Programming 6 (1974) 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Moré and W.C. Rheinboldt, “On P- and S-functions and related classes ofn-dimensional mappings,”Linear Algebra and Its Applications 6 (1973) 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.C. Rheinboldt, “On M-functions and their applications to nonlinear Gauss—Seidel iterations and to network flows,”Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 32 (1970) 274–307.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.C. Ridell, “Equivalence of nonlinear complementarity problems and least element problems in Banach lattices,”Mathematics of Operations Research 6 (1981) 462–474.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I.W. Sandberg, “A nonlinear input—output model of a multisectored economy,”Econometrica 41 (1973) 1167–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Tamir, “Minimality and complementarity properties associated with Z-functions and M-functions,”Mathematical Programming 7 (1974) 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Varga,Matrix Iterative Analysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrero, C., Silva, J.A. On the equivalence between strong solvability and strict semimonotonicity for some systems involving Z-functions. Mathematical Programming 49, 371–379 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01588798

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01588798

Key words

Navigation