Skip to main content
Log in

Identity and intimacy: An initial investigation of three theoretical models using cross-lag panel correlations

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation specified three models regarding the association between identity and intimacy formation and investigated their potential validity using a longitudinal cross-lag panel design. Seventy-one males and 71 females completed identity and intimacy measures on two occasions over a 5-week period. The primary findings are (1) individuals with a clear sense of identity are more likely, 5 weeks later, to have a more advanced sense of intimacy for both sexes when sex-role identification is removed from gender comparisons; (2) sex-role orientation mediates the identity/intimacy association, while for females, a masculine orientation is associated with a pattern similar to that observed for either masculine- or feminine-oriented males; and (3) femininity is associated with a more fused connection between identity and intimacy for females. This report provides an initial investigation studying the identity/intimacy association during late adolescence based on three theoretical perspectives. Theoretical interpretations and conclusions are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G. R., and Fitch, S. A. (1982). Ego stage and identity status development: A crosssequential analysis.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 42: 574–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, G. R., and Fitch, S. A. (1983). Psychological environments of university departments: Effects on college students' identity status and ego development.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 1266–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, G. R., and Gullotta, T. (1983).Adolescent Life Experiences, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, M. I., and McCall, R. B. (1983). Design and analysis in developmental psychology. In Kessen, W. (ed.),Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 1: History, Theory and Methods, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., Besch, P. K., and Callahan, S. (1985). Relation between testosterone concentration, sex role identity, and personality among females.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48: 1218–1226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caslyn, R. J. (1976). Guidelines for using cross-lagged panel correlation.Represent. Res. Soc. Psychol. 7: 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., and Stanley, J. D. (1963).Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1974). Family structure and feminine personality. In Rosaldo, M. Z., and Lamphere, L. (eds.),Woman, Culture and Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1969). An Eriksonian measure of personality development in college students.Dev. Psychol. 1: 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig-Bray, L., Adams, G. R., and Dobson, W. R. (1988). Identity formation and social relations during late adolescence.J. Youth Adoles. 17: 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E., and Adelson, J. (1966).The Adolescent Experience, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyk, P. A. H. (1987). Identity and intimacy: A correlational or causal connection? Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Family and Human Development, Utah State University, Logan, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1959).Identity and the Life Cycle (Psychological Issues, No. 1), International Universities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. L. (1981). Transitions in relationship style from adolescence to young adulthood.J. Youth Adoles. 10: 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, S. A., and Adams, G. R. (1983). Ego-identity and intimacy status: Replication and extension.Dev. Psychol. 19: 839–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, B. (1986).Beauty Bound, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. A., Bauman, K. E., and Udry, J. R. (1986). A panel study of subjective expected utility for adolescent sexual behavior.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 16: 745–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. M., Ispa, J. M., and Thornburg, K. R. (1986). Erikson psychosocial stage inventory: A factor analysis.Educ. Psychol. Measur. 46: 979–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. W., and Fischer, J. L. (1979). Sex differences in identity and intimacy development in college youth.J. Youth Adoles. 8: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselson, R. (1987).Finding Herself: Pathways to Identity Development in Women, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacerguis, M. A., and Adams, G. R. (1980). Erikson stage resolution: The relationship between identity and intimacy.J. Youth Adoles. 9: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness.Psychol. Bull. 82: 887–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1976).PANAL: A Computer Program for Panel Data Analysis, Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (1979). Cross-lagged panel correlation: Practice and promise.J. Appl. Psychol. 64: 372–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. (1976). Identity six years after: A follow-up study.J. Youth Adoles. 5: 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, D. R. (1975).Adolescence Today: Sex Roles and the Search for Identity, Dorsey, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., and Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy.J. Pers. 40: 525–543.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orlofsky, J., Marcia, J., and Lesser, I. (1973). Ego identity status and the intimacy vs. isolation crisis in young adulthood.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 27: 211–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. (1980). A critique of cross-lagged correlations.Psychol. Bull. 88: 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. A., Gurney, R. M., and Moore, S. M. (1981). From trust to intimacy: A new inventory for examining Erikson's stages of psychosocial development.J. Youth Adoles. 10: 525–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiedel, D. G., and Marcia, J. E. (1985). Ego identity, intimacy, sex role orientation, and gender.Dev. Psychol. 21: 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, G. L. (1979). Testosterone concentration, personality patterns, and occupational choice in women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.

  • Tesch, S. A., and Whitbourne, S. K. (1982). Intimacy and identity status in young adults.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43: 1041–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1982). Identity development from adolescence to adulthood: An extension of theory and a review of research.Dev. Psychol. 18: 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J. F. (1973).The Study of Behavioral Development, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partial support for this project was provided by grants to the second author from the Utah State University Agricultural Experiment Station and the Office of Research, Utah State University. Approved as journal paper No. 3917.

Research interests are adolescent identity development in the family context, adolescent sexuality, and sex-role development.

Research interests focus on personality and social development during adolescence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dyk, P.H., Adams, G.R. Identity and intimacy: An initial investigation of three theoretical models using cross-lag panel correlations. J Youth Adolescence 19, 91–110 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538715

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538715

Keywords

Navigation