Skip to main content
Log in

A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to a county expenditure model

  • Published:
Papers in Regional Science

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, we describe an estimation procedure that should be useful for spatial models which contain interactions between the dependent variables and autocorrelated error terms. Second, we apply that procedure to a spatial model relating to county police expenditures. Our estimation procedure does not require the specification of the error distribution, and its computational burden is modest. Large sample results are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin, L. 1980.Estimation methods for spatial autoregressive structures. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, Regional Science Dissertation and Monograph Series No. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. 1988. Model validation in spatial econometrics: A review and evaluation of alternative approaches.International Regional Science Review 11: 279–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. 1990. Spatial dependence and spatial structural instability in applied regression analysis.Journal of Regional Science 30: 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., and Rey, S. 1991. Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models.Geographic Analysis 23: 110–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S., and Brown, M. 1977. Alternative approaches to spatial autocorrelation: An improvement over current practice.International Regional Science Review 2: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, A. 1991. Spatial patterns in household demand.Econometrica 59: 953–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A., and Ord, J. K. 1973.Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A., and Ord, J. K. 1981.Spatial processes, models and applications. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R., and Craig, A. 1978.Introduction to mathematical statistics, 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G., Griffith, W., Hill, R., Lütkepohl, H., and Lee, T. 1985.The theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H., and Robinson, D. 1991. Spatial correlation: Comments on the Cliff and Ord model and a suggested alternative. College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland Working Paper 91-20.

  • Kelejian, H., and Robinson, D. 1992. Spatial autocorrelation: A new computationally simple test with an application to per capita county police expenditures.Regional Science and Urban Economics 22: 317–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potscher, B., and Prucha, I. 1991a. Basic structure of asymptotic theory in dynamic nonlinear models, Part I: Consistency and approximation concepts.Econometric Reviews 10: 125–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potscher, B., and Prucha, I. 1991b. Basic structure of the asymptotic theory in dynamic nonlinear econometric models, Part II: Asymptotic normality.Econometric Reviews 10: 253–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. 1976.Econometrics. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelejian, H.H., Robinson, D.P. A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to a county expenditure model. Papers in Regional Science 72, 297–312 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434278

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434278

Keywords

Navigation