Skip to main content
Log in

Marital alternatives and the regulation of sex

Commuter couples as a test case

  • Published:
Alternative Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between the occurrence of extramarital affairs (as an indicator of the reduction of normative constraints) and commuter marriage (as an indicator of the reduction of structural constraints) was examined. It was found that when couples set up two separate homes they were not more likely to have affairs than when they shared a single home (or that the reduction of structural constraints does not necessarily lead to the reduction of normative constraints). In contrast to other studies that stress opportunity as a key factor in the occurrence of extramarital affairs, this study suggests that attitudes toward affairs are neither enforced nor weakened by opportunity. Two underlying orientations to marriage, which exist simultaneously in different segments of the population, were uncovered: one involving an attachment to the “family as institution” and one involving an attachment to the “family as companionship.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARKIN, W. and L. DOBROFSKY (1978) “Shared labor and love: job sharing couples in academia.” Alternative Lifestyles 4: 492–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATHANASIOU, R., R. SHAVER, and C. TAVRIS (1970) “Sex (a report to Psychology Today readers).” Psychology Today 4: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARTELL, G. (1971) Group Sex. New York: Peter H. Wyden.

    Google Scholar 

  • BELL, R. R., S. TURNER, and L. ROSEN (1975) “A multivariate analysis of famale extramarital coitus.” J. of Marriage and the Family 37: 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERGER, B., B. HACKETT, and M. MILLAR (1972) “Child rearing practices in the communal family,” pp. 441–464 in A. Skolnick and J. Skolnick (eds.) Intimacy, Family and Society. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERNARD, J. (1973) The Future of Marriage. New York: Bantam

    Google Scholar 

  • BRONFENBRENNER, U. (1976) “The roots of alienation,” pp. 159–170 in N. B. Talbot (ed.) Raising Children in Modern America, Boston. Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURGESS, E. W. and H. J. LOCKE (1945) The Family From Institute to Companionship. New York: American.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and M. M. THOMES (1963) The Family. New York: Litton.

    Google Scholar 

  • CASLER, L. (1974) Is Marriage Necessary? New York: Popular Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLE, W. G. (1969) “Religious attitudes toward extramarital intercourse”, pp. 54–64 in G. Neubeck (ed.) Extra-Marital Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • COYNER, S. (1977) “Women's liberation and sexual liberation”, pp. 216–228 in R. W. Libby and R. N. Whitehurst (eds.) Marriage and Alternatives. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • CUBER, J. (1969) “Adultery: reality versus stereotype,” pp. 190–197 in G. Neubeck (ed.) Extra-Marital Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEALEY, J. Q. (1912) The Family in Its Sociological Aspects. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENFIELD, D. and M. GORDON (1971) “The sociology of mate swapping: or the family that swings together clings together.” J. of Sex Research 6: 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENSMORE, D. (1968) “On celibacy.” J. of Female Liberation 1: 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUBERMAN, L. (1974) Marriage and its Alternatives. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • DURKHEIM, E. (1951) Suicide. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLWOOD, C. A. (1913) Sociology and Modern Problems. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIRESTONE, S. (1971) The Dialectic of Sex. The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLASS, S. and T. L. WRIGHT (1977) “The relationship of extramarital sex, length of marriage, and sex differences on marital satisfaction and romanticism: Athanasiou's data reanalyzed.” J. of Marriage and the Family 39: 691–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOULDNER, A. (1960) “The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 25: 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRONSETH, E. (1978) “Work sharing: a Norwegian example,” pp. 108–121 in R. Rapaport and R. Rapaport (eds.) Working Couples. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, L. (1978) “Benefits and problems of egalitarian marriage: a study of role sharing couples.” Presented at 73rd Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.

  • HENSHEL, A. (1973) “Swinging: a study of decision making in marriage.” Amer. J. of Sociology 78: 885–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUNT, M. (1974) Sexual Behavior in the 1970's. New York: Playboy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, R. (1970) “Some correlates of extramarital coitus.” J. of Marriage and the Family 32: 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSTON, J. (1973) Lesbian Nation: The Feminist Solution. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTER, R. (1977) Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1972) Commitment and Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KINSEY, A, W. POMEROY, and C. E. MARTIN (1948) Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • KINSEY, A., W. POMEROY, and P. H. GEBHARD (1953) Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIRKENDALL, L. (1974) “Motives for sex,” in L. Gross (ed.) Sexual Behavior. New York: Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASCH, C. (1977) Haven in a Heartless World. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWS, J. L. and P. SCHWARTZ (1977) Sexual Scripts. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. J. (1975) “The Redbook report on premarital and extramarital sex.” Redbook (October): 38ff.

  • LIBBY, R. and R. N. WHITEHURST (1977) Marriage and Alternatives: Exploring Intimate Relationships. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAYKOVICH, M. K. (1976) “Attitudes versus behavior in extramarital sexual relations.” J. of Marriage and the Family 38: 693–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • MITCHELL, J. (1973) Women's Estate. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORGAN, R. (1969) “Goodbye to all that,” pp. 241–248 in B. Roszak and T. Roszak (eds.) Masculine-Feminine. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • OGBURN, W. F. (1927) “Eleven questions concerning American marriages.” Social Forces 6: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'NEIL, N. and G. O'NEIL (1972) Open Marriage. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • PHELPS, L. (1975) “Female sexual alienation,” pp. 16–23 in J. Freeman (ed.) Women: A Feminist Perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonko, K. (1978) “Sex roles and voluntarily childless couples.” Presented at 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.

  • RAMEY, J. W. (1977) “Alternative life styles.” Society 14: 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSEN, B., T. JARDEE, and T. PRESTWICH (1975) “Dual-career marital adjustment: potential effects of discriminatory managerial attitudes.” J. of Marriage and the Family 37: 565–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROWBOTHAM, S. (1974) Woman's Consciousness, Man's World. Middlesex, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAFILIOS-ROTHSCHILD, C. (1976) “Dual linkages between the occupational and family systems: a macrosociological analysis.” Signs 1: 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEIDENBERG, R. (1973) Corporate Wives—Corporate Casualties? New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • SINGH, B. K., B. L. WALTON, and J. S. WILLIAMS (1976) “Extramarital sexual permissiveness: conditions and contingencies.” J. of Marriage and the Family 38: 701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUSSMAN, J. (1975) “The four f's of variant family forms and marriage styles.” Family Coordinator 24: 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEEVERS, J. E. (1973) “Voluntary Childlessness: a neglected area of family study.” Family Coordinator 22: 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITEHURST, R. N. (1971) “Violence potential in extramarital sexual responses.” J. of Marriage and the Family 33: 683–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZABLOCKI, B. (1971) The Joyful Community. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZIMMERMAN, C. (1972) “The 1971 Burgess Award Address: the future of the family in America.” J. of Marriage and the Family 34: 323ff.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerstel, N.R. Marital alternatives and the regulation of sex. J Fam Econ Iss 2, 145–176 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082593

Keywords

Navigation