Skip to main content
Log in

Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evoked brain potentials were used to monitor moment-by-moment decisions during language comprehension. Subjects read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities for which one of the possible interpretations was semantically implausible. The N400 component of the evoked potential, which is sensitive to implausibility, was used to discover when during a sentence subjects made a decision about the ambiguity. The results demonstrate that readers try to interpret a syntactic ambiguity early in a sentence rather than waiting for disambiguating information. This introduces a new way to use brain activity to study sentence comprehension processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besson, M., & Macar, F. (1987). An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts.Psychophysiology, 24, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, J., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Garnsey, S.M. (1989).Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in parsing. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Clifton, C. Jr., & Frazier, L. (1986). The use of syntactic information in filling gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (1988). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In M.K. Tanenhaus & G. Carlson (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C., Jr., Frazier, L., & Connine, C. (1984). Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 696–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., & Fodor, J.D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D.R. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A.M. Zwicky (Eds.),Natural language processing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. New York: Cambrige University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einot, I., & Gabriel, K. R. (1975). A study of the powers of several methods of multiple comparison.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, I., Bloom, P.A., Childers, D.G., Roucos, S.E., & Perry N.W. (1983). Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification.Psychophysiology, 20, 400–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations.Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.D. (1988). On modularity in syntactic processing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 125–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M., & Dalrymple, M. (1988). A note on psychological evidence and alternative grammars.Cognition, 29, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., Clifton, C., Jr., & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehesion.Cognition, 13, 187–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, H.H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980a). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science, 207, 204–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980b). Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing.Brain and Language, 11, 354–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies.Memory and Cognition, 11, 539–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.Nature, 307, 161–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nageishi, Y., & Shimokochi, M. (1985). The effects of semantic or grammatical incongruity on event-related potentials in Japanese.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 61, S32-S33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polich, J. (1985a). Semantic categorization and event-related potentials.Brain and Language, 26, 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polich, J. (1985b). N400s from sentences, semantic categories, and number and letter strings?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 361–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T.A. (1959). Multiple comparisons in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin, 56, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, L.A. (1986). Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location.Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M.K., Stowe, L.A., & Carlson, G. (1985).The interaction of lexical expectation and pragmatics in parsing filler-gap constructions. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science Society Meeting.

  • Tanenhaus, M.K., Boland, J., Garnsey, S.M. & Carlson, G. (1989). Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M.K., Garnsey, S.M., & Boland, J. (1989). Argument structure and the parsing of long-distance dependencies. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Welsch, R.E. (1977). Stepwise multiple comparison procedures.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garnsey, S.M., Tanenhaus, M.K. & Chapman, R.M. Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. J Psycholinguist Res 18, 51–60 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069046

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069046

Keywords

Navigation