Skip to main content
Log in

Minimization and estimation of geoid undulation errors

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to minimize the geoid undulation errors by focusing on the contribution of the global geopotential model and regional gravity anomalies, and to estimate the accuracy of the predicted gravimetric geoid.

The geopotential model's contribution is improved by (a) tailoring it using the regional gravity anomalies and (b) introducing a weighting function to the geopotential coefficients. The tailoring and the weighting function reduced the difference (1σ) between the geopotential model and the GPS/levelling-derived geoid undulations in British Columbia by about 55% and more than 10%, respectively.

Geoid undulations computed in an area of 40° by 120° by Stokes' integral with different kernel functions are analyzed. The use of the approximated kernels results in about 25 cm (σ) and 190 cm (maximum) geoid errors. As compared with the geoid derived by GPS/levelling, the gravimetric geoid gives relative differences of about 0.3 to 1.4 ppm in flat areas, and 1 to 2.5 ppm in mountainous areas for distances of 30 to 200 km, while the absolute difference (1σ) is about 5 cm and 20 cm, respectively.

A optimal Wiener filter is introduced for filtering of the gravity anomaly noise, and the performance is investigated by numerical examples. The internal accuracy of the gravimetric geoid is studied by propagating the errors of the gravity anomalies and the geopotential coefficients into the geoid undulations. Numerical computations indicate that the propagated geoid errors can reasonably reflect the differences between the gravimetric and GPS/levelling-derived geoid undulations in flat areas, such as Alberta, and is over optimistic in the Rocky Mountains of British Columbia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basic, T. H. Denker, P. Knudsen, D. Solheim and W. Torge, 1989, A new geopotential model tailored to gravity data in Europe. International Association of Geodesy Symposia 103: Gravity, gradiometry and Gravimetry, pp. 109–118.

  • Cadzow, J.A. 1990,Foundation of digital signal processing and data analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company, Colier Macmillan Publishers.

  • Colombo, O.L., 1981, Numerical methods for harmonic analysis on the sphere. OSU Rept. 310, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fatta, D.J., J.G. Lucas and W.S. Hodgkiss, 1988,Digital signal processing: A system design approach. John Willey & Sons.

  • Forsberg, R. and F. Madsen, 1990, High-precision geoid heights in GPS/levelling. Proceedings of GPS'90 Symposium, Ottawa, Ontario, September 3–7.

  • Forsberg, R. and M.G. Sideris, 1993, Geoid computations by the multi-band spherical FFT approach. Manuscripta Geodaetica, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haagmans, R., E. de Min and M. van Gelderen, 1993, Fast evaluation of convolution integrals on the sphere using 1D FFT, and a comparison with existing methods for Stokes integral. Manuscripta Geodaetica, Vol. 18, pp. 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, W.A. and H. Moritz, 1967,Physical Geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Company. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H.T., 1984, Kernel function approximation of Stokes' integral. Proceedings of the International Summer School on local gravity field approximation. Beijing, (ed. K.P. Schwarz, 1985, Calgary).

  • Kulhanek, O., 1976,Introduction to digital filtering in geophysics. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

  • Li, Y.C., 1993, Optimized spectral geoid determination. USCE report 20050, Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissl, P.A., 1971, A study of covariance functions related to the Earth's disturbing potential. OSU Rept. 151, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molodensky, M.S., V.F. Eremeev and M.I. Yurkina, 1962, Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth. Israel Prog. Sci. translations, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, H., 1983, Local geoid determination in mountainous areas. OSU Rept. 353, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, A.V. and R.W. Schafer, 1989,Discretetime signal processing. Prentice hall.

  • Pellinen, L.P., 1966, A method for expanding the gravity potential of the Earth in spherical functions. Transactions of the Central Scientific Research Institute of Geodesy. Aerial Survey and Cartography, Issue 171, 92p. Published by Nedra, Moscow; Translation ACIC-TC-1282.

  • Rapp, R.H., Y.M. Wang and N.K. Pavils, 1991, The Ohio State 1991 geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models. OSU Rept. No. 410, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, K.P., 1984, Data types and their spectral properties. Proceedings of Local Gravity Field Approximation. Beijing, China, August 21-September 4.

  • Schwarz, K.P., M.G. Sideris and R. Forsberg, 1990, The use of FFT techniques in physical geodesy. Geophys. J. Int. Vol. 100, pp. 485–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, K.P., M.G. Sideris and R. Forsberg, 1987, Orthometric heights without levelling. Journal of Surveying Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 1, pp. 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, B.B., 1993, A PC-based unified geoid for Canada. USCE report 20051, Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sideris, M.G., 1993, Tests of a gravimetric geoid in GPS networks. Surveying and Land Information Systems, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sideris, M.G. and R. Forsberg, 1990, Review of geoid prediction methods in mountainous regions. Proceeding of the First International Geoid Commission, Milano, Italy

  • Sideris, M.G. and Y.C. Li, 1992, Improved geoid determination for levelling by GPS. Proceedings of the Sixth Int. Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, Columbus, OH, March 17–20, 1992.

  • Sideris, M.G. and Y.C. Li, 1993, Gravity field convolutions without windowing and edge effects. Bulletin Geodesique, Vol. 67, pp. 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sideris, M.G. and K.P. Schwarz, 1986, Solving Molodensky's series by fast Fourier transform techniques. Bulletin Geodesique, Vol. 60, pp. 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sideris, M.G. and I.N. Tziavos, 1988, FFT-evaluation and applications of gravity field convolutionn integrals with mean and point. Bulletin Geodesique, Vol. 62, pp.521–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang van Hees, G., 1990, Stokes' formula using fast Fourier techniques. Manuscripta Geodaetica, Vol. 15, pp.235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L.E., 1987, Progress in global gravity field approximation, Contributions to geodetic theory and methodology. XIX general meeting of the IUGG, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tziavos, I.N., 1993, Numerical considerations of FFT methods in gravity field modeling. Wiss Arb. Univ. Hannover, Nr. 188.

  • Tziavos, I.N., M.G. Sideris and K.P. Schwarz, 1992, A study of the contributions of various gravimetric data types on the estimation of gravity field parameters in the mountains. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 97, No. B6, pp.8843–8852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.M., 1992, On the optimal combination of the geopotential coefficient model with the terrestrial gravity data for the FFT geoid computations. Paper submitted to Manuscripta Geodaetica.

  • Weber, G. and H. Zomorrodian, 1988, Regional geopotential model improvement for the Iranian geoid determination. Bulletin Geodesique, Vol. 62, pp. 125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichiencharoen, C., 1982, The indirect effects on the computation of geoid undulations. OSU Rept. 336, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. 1949, Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series with engineering applications. The Technology Press of M.I.T. and Wiley.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y.C., Sideris, M.G. Minimization and estimation of geoid undulation errors. Bulletin Géodésique 68, 201–219 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00808101

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00808101

Keywords

Navigation