Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life of community mental health program clients: Validating a measure

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quality of life theory is proposed as a framework for conceptualizing and evaluating mental health services. Quality of life consists of fulfilling needs, meeting social expectations, and accessing opportunities by using abilities. Abilities are impaired by mental illness. Mental health services moderate social demands, supplement opportunities, and restore abilities. A 263 item questionnaire was developed to assess the impact of mental health services on clients' quality of life. A 24 site study including 1,154 pre-tests, 758 post-tests, and 190 interviews with randomly selected community residents was conducted. Evidence for the reliability and validity of the questionnaire are presented. The instrument discriminates among four known client groups, client and community samples, communities with known quality of life differences, and pre- versus post-treatment samples of clients. The convergence between client's retrospective impressions of improvement and measured pre-post improvement is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barron, N. (1984). The quality of life of community support clients. Salem, Oregon: Mental Health Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, D.A. & Beiser, M. (1978). Rehabilitation for the chronically mentally ill: A community program.Canada's Mental Health, 26(2), 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, D.A., Brodsky, G., Stewart, L. & Olson, M. (1982). The concept and measurement of quality of life as a dependent variable in evaluation of mental health services. In W. Tash & G. Stahler (Eds.),Innovative approaches to mental health evaluation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, D.A., Gareau, M.J., & Young, D.J. (in press). A quality of life interview for chronically disabled people.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal.

  • Bigelow, D.A., McFarland, B.H., Gareau, M.J. & Young, D.J. (1983). Implementation and effectiveness of the Dammasch Bed Reduction Project. Portland, Oregon: Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health Sciences University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, D.A., & Hooper, J. (1977). Impact of community care on quality of life of severely mentally ill patients. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Greater Vancouver Mental Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, D.A. & Smoyer, S. (1981). Design of a statewide strategy for performance measures for mental health services. Salem, Oregon: Mental Health Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, D.A. & Young, D. (1990). The implementation and impact of a case management program. Portland, Oregon: Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health Sciences University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boys, G. (1976). An inter-rater reliability study of the multi-dimensional outcome measure. Portland, Oregon: Portland State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N.M. (1969).The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.B., Brown, T.R., Peterson, P.D., & Rowe, M.M. (1980).The two state collaborative mental health outcome study: State of Washington. Vol. I & II. Olympia, Washington: Department of Health Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciarlo, J.A. & Reihman, J. (1977). The Denver Community Mental Health Questionnaire: development of a multidimensional program evaluation instrument. In R. Coursey, et al.Program evaluation for mental health: methods, strategies, and participants. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L., Gleser, G., Nada, H. & Rajaratnam, R. (1972).The dependability of measurements. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, G. & Yegge, L. (1982). A client outcome study of a community support demonstration project.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 6(2), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammaker, R. (1983). A client outcome evaluation of the statewide implementation of community support services.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 7(1), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannon, P. (1980). Quality of life: evaluating the community support program. Albany, New York: Bureau of Community Support Systems, New York State Office of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill.Evaluation & Program Planning, 11, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F. (1983). The well-being of chronic mental patients.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F., Ward, N.C., & Linn, L.S. (1982). Chronic mental patients: the quality of life issue.American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1271–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1954).Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, C. & Filion, J. (1987). La qualite de la vie: perspectives theoriques et empiriques.Sante Mentale au Quebec, 12, 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1967).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M.M., Smoyer, S. & Stewart, L. (1981).Handbook for the manually operated program impact monitoring system. Salem, Oregon: Mental Health Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelligrino, J.W. (1988). Mental models and mental tests. Chapter 4 in H. Wainer & H.I. Braun (Eds.)Test validity. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny, L. & Waters, R.M. (1981) The Tennessee mental health outcome project, final report. Nashville, Tennessee: Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C.A., Gowdy, E., Sullivan, W.P. & Wintersteen, R. (1988). Client outcome reporting: the status method.Community Mental Health Journal, 24, 118–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. & Allen, V. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.).The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 1. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.A. & Wertheimer, M. (1962).Introduction to psychological research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zautra, A., Beier, E. & Coppel, L. (1977). The dimensions of life quality in a community.American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The data collection was supported by National Institute of Mental Health contract 278-79-0053(OP), Enid Light, project officer, and Cecil Wurster, adviser, both contributed greatly to this work. The writing of this paper was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant MH43458-02.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bigelow, D.A., McFarland, B.H. & Olson, M.M. Quality of life of community mental health program clients: Validating a measure. Community Ment Health J 27, 43–55 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752714

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752714

Keywords

Navigation