Skip to main content
Log in

Atenolol and metoprolol: Comparison of effects on blood pressure and serum lipoproteins, and side effects

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Several β-blockers increase VLDL-TG and decrease HDL-cholesterol concentrations. The underlying mechanism ist not yet clear. Some studies have suggested that the effect is less pronounced during treatment with selective β-blockers. The effects of 2 such drugs, metoprolol 200 mg/day and atenolol 50 mg/day, have been compared in 50 hypertensive patients (WHO Stage I–II), mean age 47 years. Serum lipoproteins were determined in 20 patients before treatment and after treatment with either drug for 3 months. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. After atenolol the initial VLDL-cholesterol concentration of 1.04 mmol/l had not changed, but it rose to 1.29 mmol/l after metoprolol (p<0.05). The HDL-cholesterol concentration 1.42 mmol/l did not fall during atenolol treatment, but during metoprolol there was a small reduction to 1.31 mmol/l (p<0.05). Hyperlipoproteinaemia is common in hypertensive patients, 40% of the present group had hypertriglyceridaemia and 25% had hypercholesterolaemia. Thus, atenolol 50 mg was found not to affect lipoproteins, whereas metoprolol 200 mg increased the VLDL concentration in 75% of the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frishman W, Silverman R, Strom J, Elkayam U, Sonnenblick E (1979) Clinical pharmacology of the new beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. Part 4. Adverse effects. Choosing a β-adrenoreceptor blocker. Am Heart J 98: 256–262

    Google Scholar 

  2. Láger I, Smith U (1981) Betablockad och diabetes mellitus. Läkartidningen 78 [8]: 696–699

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rössner S (1982) Serum lipoproteins and ischemic vascular disease: On the interpretation of serum lipid versus serum lipoprotein concentrations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 4 [Suppl 2]: S201–205

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson BF (1982) The emerging problem of plasma lipid changes during antihypertensive therapy. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 4 [Suppl 3]: S213–221

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson LA, Böttiger LE (1981) Serum triglycerides, to be or not to be a risk factor for ischaemic heart disease? Atherosclerosis 39: 287–291

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller GJ, Miller NE (1975) Plasma-high-density-lipoprotein concentration and development of ischaemic heart-disease. Lancet 1: 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eliasson K, Lins L-E, Rössner S (1981) Serum lipoprotein changes during atenolol treatment of essential hypertension. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 20: 335–338

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlson K (1973) Lipoprotein fractionation. J Clin Pathol 26 [Suppl] 5: 32–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lyngstam O, Rydén L (1981) Metoprolol and atenolol administered once daily in primary hypertension. Acta Med Scand 209: 261–266

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilcox RG, Hampton JR (1981) A comparative study of atenolol, metoprolol durules and slow-release oxprenolol in essential hypertension. Br Heart J 46: 498–502

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas GW, Mann JI, Beilin LJ, Ledingham JG (1977) Hypertension and raised serum lipids. Br Med J 2: 805

    Google Scholar 

  12. Östergaard-Kristensen B (1981) HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and vascular complications in essential hypertension. Acta Med Scand [Suppl] 646: 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. Östergaard-Kristensen B (1981) Effect of long-term treatment with beta-blocking drugs on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Br Med J 283: 191–192

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson LA, Ericsson M (1975) Quantitative and qualitative serum lipoprotein analysis. Part I. Studies in healthy men and women. Atherosclerosis 21: 417–433

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HJ, Kalkhoff RK (1979) Changes in lipoprotein composition during the menstrual cycle. Metabolism 28: 663–668

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newman RJ (1977) Comparison of the antilipolytic effect of metoprolol, acebutolol, and propranolol in man. Br Med J 2: 601–603

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka N, Sakaguchi S, Oshige K, Niimura T, Kanehisa T (1976) Effect of chronic administration of propranolol on lipoprotein composition. Metabolism 25: 1071–1075

    Google Scholar 

  18. Day JL, Metcalfe J, Simpson CN (1982) Adrenergic mechanisms in control of plasma lipid concentrations. Br Med J 284: 1145–1148

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berglund G, Andersson O (1981) Beta-blockers or diuretics in hypertension? A six year follow-up of blood pressure and metabolic side effects. Lancet 1: 744–747

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pagnan A, Pessina AC, Hlede M et al (1979) Effects of labetalol on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Pharmacol Res Commun 11: 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leren P, Helgeland A, Holme I et al (1980) Effect of propranolol and prazosin on blood lipids. The Oslo Study. Lancet 2: 4–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rössner, S., Weiner, L. Atenolol and metoprolol: Comparison of effects on blood pressure and serum lipoproteins, and side effects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24, 573–577 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542203

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542203

Key words

Navigation