Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple factors promoting narrow host range in the sea hare, Aplysia californica

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Juvenile sea hares, Aplysia californica, utilize only the red algae Plocamium cartilagineum and Laurencia pacifica as host plants at Santa Catalina Island, CA. I tested three hypotheses which might account for this pattern of host choice: 1) A. californica specialize on the algae on which they grow best, 2) A. california specialize on algae from which they acquire secondary compounds that protect them from predators, and 3) A. californica specialize on certain algae in order to lower their encounter rates with predators. The results suggested that host range in the Aplysia californica system is affected by more than one factor. The first hypothesis was supported. A. californica of three size classes grew well on Plocamium, but could not grow at all on most other species of algae. Larger A. californica were able to grow on species of algae that smaller ones could not. The second hypothesis was also supported. Small A. californica grown on Plocamium were rich in terpenes. Small A. californica grown on Ulva sp. were terpene-free. Rock wrasses, Halichoeres semicinctus, were more likely to eat Ulva-fed A. californica than Plocamium-fed A. californica. Other fish and lobster, Panulirus interruptus, did not discriminate between the two groups. Kelp bass, Paralabrax clathratus, which were force-fed Ulva-fed A. californica regurgitated them less often, and after digesting them more completely, than did Paralabrax force-fed Plocamium-fed A. californica. The third hypothesis was rejected. A. californica located on Plocamium were not more cryptic to the opisthobranch Aglaja inermis (navanax), or to the pomacentrid fish, Hypsypops rubicundus, than were A. californica located on other algae. In addition, navanax, a specialist predator of opisthobranchs, was significantly more abundant on Plocamium than on other algae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audesirk TE (1975) Chemoreception in Aplysia californica. I. Behavioral localization of distance chemoreceptors used in food-finding. Behav Biol 15:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Audesirk TE (1979) A field study of growth and reproduction in Aplysia californica. Biol Bull 157:407–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa P (1988) Some thoughts on “the evolution of host range”. Ecology 69:912–915

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays E, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP (1984) Chemical defense in butterflies. R Entomol Symp 11:109–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP, Ryerson WN, Coppinger LL, Glazier SC (1968) Ecological chemistry and the palatability spectrum. Science 161:1349–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Carefoot TH (1987) Aplysia: its biology and ecology. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 25:167–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DJ, Fox DL (1969) Bile pigment metabolism in the seahare Aplysia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 4:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney S (1988) If it's not coevolution, it must be predation? Ecology 69:910–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Damman H (1987) Leaf quality and enemy avoidance by the larvae of a pyralid moth. Ecology 68:88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds M (1987) Color in opisthobranchs. Am Malacol Bull 5:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner DJ, Ghiselin MT (1983) Chemical defense and evolutionary ecology of dorid nudibranches and some other opisthobranch gastropods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 13:295–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenical W (1975) Halogenation in the Rhodophyta. A review. J Phycol 11:245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox LR, Morrow PA (1981) Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? Science 211:887–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Fenical W (1988) Marine plant-herbivore interactions: the ecology of chemical defense. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19:111–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Duffy JE, Pfister CA, Fenical W (1987a) Chemical defense against different marine herbivores: are amphipods insect equivalents? Ecology 68:1567–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Fenical W, Gustafson K (1987b) Chemical defense against diverse coral-reef herbivores. Ecology 68:1581–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Duffy JE, Fenical W, Gustafson K (1988a) Chemical defense in the seaweed Dictyopteris delicatula: differential effects against reef fishes and amphipods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 48:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Renaud PE, Fenical W (1988b) Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defenses. Oecologia 75:246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy T (1988) Can predation lead to narrow food specialization in phytophagous insects? Ecology 69:902–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnel RB, Dieter RK, Meinwald J, Van Engen D, Clardy J, Eisner T, Stallard MO, Fenical W (1979) Brasilenye and cis-dihydrorhodophytin: Antifeedant medium-ring haloethers from a sea hare Aplysia brasiliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:3576–3579

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegstein AR, Castellucci V, Kandel ER (1974) Metamorphosis of Aplysia californica in laboratory culture. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 71:3654–3658

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL, Lukowiak K (1986) The behavior of Aplysia californica Cooper (Gastropoda; opisthobranchia): I. Ethogram. Behavior 98:320–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1976) The chemical defenses of plants to pathogens and herbivores. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:121–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J, Gaines SD (1981) A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. I. Populations and communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:405–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses LE (1986) Think and explain with statistics. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris JN, Fenical W (1982) Chemical defense in tropical marine algae. In: Rutzler K, Macintyre IG (eds) The atlantic barrier reef ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, I. Structure and communities. Smithsonian Institution Press

  • Paul VJ, Van Alstyne KL (1988) Use of ingested algal diterpenoids by Elysia halimedae Macnae (Opisthobranchia: Ascoglossa) as antipredator defenses. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 119:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul VJ, Hay ME, Duffy JE, Fenical W, Gustafson K (1987) Chemical defense in the seaweed Ochtodes secundiramea (Montagne) Howe (Rhodophyta): effects of its monoterpenoid components upon diverse coral-reef herbivores. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 114:249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SC (1989) Temporal and spatial variation in the recruitment of the sea hare, Aplysia californica, at Santa Catalina Island. In: Recent advances in California Island Research: Proc Third Calif Isl Symp. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History (in press)

  • Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: Influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JF, Dunham AE (1983) On hypothesis testing in ecology and evolution. Am Nat 122:602–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Roininen H, Tahvanainen J (1989) Host selection and larval performance of two willow-feeding sawflies. Ecology 70:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JC (1988) Many factors influence the evolution of herbivore diets, but plant chemistry is central. Ecology 69:896–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallard MO, Faulkner DJ (1974a) Chemical constituents of the digestive gland of the sea hare Aplysia californica — I. Importance of diet. Comp Biochem Physiol 49B:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallard MO, Faulkner DJ (1974b) Chemical constituents of the digestive gland of the sea hare Aplysia californica. — II. Chemical transformations. Comp Biochem Physiol 49B:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg PD (1985) Feeding preferences of Tegula funebralis and chemical defenses of marine brown algae. Ecol Mon 55:333–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Steneck RS (1982) A limpet-coralline alga association: adaptations and defenses between a selective herbivore and its prey. Ecology 63:507–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1988) Special feature. Insect Host range. Ecology 69:885

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1988a) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1988b) Coevolution and alternative hypotheses on insect/plant interactions. Ecology 69:893–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas RL (1977) Preferential feeding: an optimization strategy in sea urchins. Ecol Mon 47:337–371

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pennings, S.C. Multiple factors promoting narrow host range in the sea hare, Aplysia californica . Oecologia 82, 192–200 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323535

Key words

Navigation