Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear volume and chromatin conformation of small and large bovine luteal cells: effect of gonadotropins and prostaglandins and dependence on luteal phase

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Change in nuclear volume and chromatin conformation are generally considered to reflect altered gene expression in eukaryotic cells. The present studies were undertaken to investigate whether these nuclear parameters of luteal cells can be altered by hormone treatment in vitro or change during the estrous cycle. The nuclear volume of small luteal cells was significantly lower than that of large luteal cells during the cycle and pregnancy. The nuclear volumes of small and large luteal cells from pregnancy did not change during incubation without any hormone or with 10 nM prostaglandin (PG)F. However, incubation with 1 nM human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or 10 nM PGE1 resulted in a significant increase of nuclear volume of small luteal cells by 4 h and that of large luteal cells by 6 h. Small cells were more responsive to hCG than large luteal cells. The nuclear volumes of small and large luteal cells also significantly increased from early to mid luteal phase with no further change in late luteal phase. hCG and PGE1, as well as PGF, treatment resulted in a change of chromatin conformation of small and large luteal cells. Dibutyryl cyclic AMP (10 mM) mimicked the hormones by increasing nuclear volumes and changing the chromatin conformation of small and large luteal cells. Chromatin conformation of small and large luteal cells also changed from early to mid luteal phase and mid to late luteal phase. In conclusion, in vitro, hCG and PGs can regulate nuclear volume and/or chromatin conformation of small as well as large bovine luteal cells. In vivo, these nuclear changes occur during the periods of luteal growth, development and regression in the estrous cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry JM, Merriam RW (1972) Swelling of hen erythrocyte nuclei in cytoplasm from Xenopus egg. Exp Cell Res 71:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezney R (1979) Dynamic property of the nuclear matrix. In: Busch H (ed) Cell nucleus, vol VII. Chromatin, part D. Academic Press, New York, pp 413–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibbins PE Jr, Rao CV, Carman FR, Chegini N, Lei ZM (1991) Role of luteal cell nucleus in the expression of gonadotropin action. J Endocrinol Invest (in press)

  • Brasch K (1982) Fine structure and localization of the nuclear matrix in situ. Exp Cell Res 140:161–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1978) Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J Cell Sci 34:247–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Rao CV (1988) Increase of nuclear bodies in bovine luteal cells following treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin. Biol Reprod 38:453–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Gregory SP, Hilder VA, Pocklington MJ, Maclean N (1981a) Structural transitions of chromatin in isolated Xenopus erythrocyte nuclei. I: The effect of ions. J Submicrosc Cytol 13:291–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Hilder VA, Gregory SP, Maclean N (1981b) Structural transitions of chromatin in isolated Xenopus erythrocyte nuclei. II: Computer-based image analysis. J Submicrosc Cytol 13:309–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Rao CV, Carman FR Jr (1984a) Internalization of 125I-human chorionic gonadotropin in bovine luteal slices. A biochemical study. Exp Cell Res 151:466–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Rao CV, Cobbs G (1984b) A quantitative electron microscope autoradiographic study on 125I-human chorionic gonadotropin internalization in bovine luteal slices. Exp Cell Res 151:483–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Rao CV, Cobbs G (1984c) A quantitative electron microscope autoradiographic study on 3H-prostaglandin E1 and F internalization in bovine luteal slices. Mol Cell Endocrinol 38:117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Ramani N, Rao CV (1984d) Morphological and biochemical characterization of small and large bovine luteal cells during pregnancy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 37:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Chegini N, Rao CV (1987) Dynamics of nuclear associated granules in bovine luteal cells after treatment in vitro with prostaglandin F. Endocrinology 121:1870–1878

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson GA, Smuckler EA (1980) Polypeptide composition of nuclear envelope following thioacetamide induced nuclear swelling. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 96:370–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolby TW, Belmont A, Borun TW, Nicolini C (1981) DNA replication, chromatin structure and histone phosphorylation altered by theophylline in synchronized HeLa S3 cells. J Cell Biol 89:78–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields MJ, Fields PA (1986) Luteal neurophysin in the non pregnant cow and ewe: immunocytochemical localization in membrane bounded secretory granules of the large luteal cell. Endocrinology 118:1723–1725

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldenaar SEF, Wathes DC, Pickering BT (1984) Immunocytochemical evidence for the presence of oxytocin and Neurophysin in the large cells of the bovine corpus luteum. Cell Tissue Res 237:349–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansel W (1971) Survival and gonadotropin responsiveness of luteal cells in vitro. In: Diczfalusy (E) 3rd Symposium: in vitro methods in reproductive cell biology. Bogtrykkeriet, Copenhagen, pp 295–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde JE (1982) Expansion of chicken erythrocyte nuclei upon limited micrococcal nuclease digestion: correlation with higher order chromatin structure. Exp Cell Res 140:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh JM (1971) The effect of prostaglandins on the adenyl cyclase of the bovine corpus luteum. Ann NY Acad Sci 180:416–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport JW, Forbes DJ (1987) The nucleus structure, function and dynamics. Ann Rev Biochem 56:535–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini C, Carlo P, Finollo R, Vigo F, Cavazza B, Ledda A, Ricci E, Brambiller G (1984) Phase transitions in nuclei and chromatin. Is nuclear volume controlled by the chromatin or by the nuclear matrix. Cell Biophys 6:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Oechsli M, Rao CV, Chegini N (1989) Human chorionic gonadotropin increases chromatin solubility in isolated bovine and human luteal nuclei. Biol Reprod 41:753–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramani N, Rao CV (1987) Direct stimulation of nucleoside triphosphatase activity in bovine luteal nuclear membranes by human chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology 120:2468–2473

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CV, Mitra S (1979) Gonadotropin and prostaglandins binding sites in nuclei of bovine corpora lutea. Biochim Biophys Acta 584:454–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CV, Mitra S, Carman FR Jr (1981a) Characterization of gonadotropin binding sites in the intracellular organelles of bovine corpora lutea and comparison with plasma membrane sites. J Biol Chem 256:2628–2634

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CV, Mitra S, Sanfilippo J, Carman FR Jr (1981b) The presence of gonadotropin binding sites in the intracellular organelles of human ovaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139:655–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiga H, Kinoshita S (1976) Changes of chromatin structure induced by acid mucopolysaccharides. Exp Cell Res 102:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RD, Pomerantz AJ, Beal WE, McCann JP, Pilbeam TE, Hansel W (1984) Insemination of Holstein heifers at a present time after estrous cycle synchronization using progesterone and prostaglandin. J Animal Sci 58:792–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RG, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MJ, Clark CL (1987) Detection of relaxin release by porcine luteal cells using a reverse hemolytic plaque assay: effect of prostaglandins E2 and F, human chorionic gonadotropin and oxytocin. Biol Reprod 37:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo A, Ramani N, Rao CV (1987) Direct stimulation of nucleoside triphosphatase activity in human ovarian nuclear membranes by human chorionic gonadotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber DM, Fields PA, Romrell LJ, Tumwasorn S, Ball BA, Drost M, Fields MJ (1987) Functional differences between small and large luteal cells of the late pregnant vs nonpregnant cow. Biol Reprod 37:685–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebel ER (1979) Stereological methods, vol 1. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock CLF, Lafond RE, Woodcock H, Baldwin LA, Bhorjee JS (1984) Reactivation of avian erythrocyte nuclei in mammalian cytoplasts. A dominant role for pre-existing cytoplasmic components. Exp Cell Res 154:155–170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chegini, N., Lei, Z.M. & Rao, C.V. Nuclear volume and chromatin conformation of small and large bovine luteal cells: effect of gonadotropins and prostaglandins and dependence on luteal phase. Cell Tissue Res 264, 453–460 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319035

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319035

Key words

Navigation