Skip to main content
Log in

Fixed effect genetic analysis of a diallel cross in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A full diallel cross among four diverse homozygous strains of dry edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) was evaluated for yield, protein content, and culinary quality traits in the F2 and F3 generations in two locations. Interpretation of diallel effects [Method 1 Model I] using a fixed-effect genetic model made it possible to combine data from two generations into a single analysis and quantify the relative contributions of additive and dominance genetic effects to general (GCA) and specific (SCA) combining abilities. GCA was found to arise from three potential sources: additive effects, dominance interactions at homozygous loci, and average dominance interactions in hybrids involving the parent in question. SCA was found to be a function solely of dominance. Additive effects were the primary determinant of GCA and were highly significant. Specific dominance interactions were significant for seed yield, cooked bean moisture content, and texture but not for protein content. Texture was the only trait for which the additive-dominance model failed to provide an adequate fit to the data, suggesting that texture is significantly affected by epistatic interaction. One cross (‘Brazil-2’ × ‘Sanilac’) was identified that exhibited a large heterotic effect for seed yield although the parents' additive effects were nonsignificant. Such a “nicking” effect was attributed to complementation between the two parents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RJ (1978) Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci 18:533–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham CC (1980) Random and fixed effects in plant genetics. Theor Appl Genet 56:119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart SA, Gardner CO (1966) A general model for genetic effects. Biometrics 22:864–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman BI (1954a) The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman BI (1954b) The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39:789–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosfield GL, Uebersax MA (1980) Variability in physicochemical properties and nutritional components of tropical and domestic dry bean germplasm. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 105:246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks JL, Hayman BI (1953) The analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Genet Coop Newslett 27:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague GF, Tatum LA (1942) General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J Am Soc Agron 34:923–932

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A.R. Hallauer

Cooperative investigations of the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at Michigan State University. Approved for publication by the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Article No. 11791. Research supported by USAID under a Title XII Bean/Cowpea CRSP and cooperative with Washington State University, Pullman, WA99164

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wassimi, N.N., Isleib, T.G. & Hosfield, G.L. Fixed effect genetic analysis of a diallel cross in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 72, 449–454 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289525

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289525

Key words

Navigation