Skip to main content
Log in

Fingertip contact influences human postural control

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Touch and pressure stimulation of the body surface can strongly influence apparent body orientation, as well as the maintenance of upright posture during quiet stance. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between postural sway and contact forces at the fingertip while subjects touched a rigid metal bar. Subjects were tested in the tandem Romberg stance with eyes open or closed under three conditions of fingertip contact: no contact, touch contact (<0.98 N of force), and force contact (as much force as desired). Touch contact was as effective as force contact or sight of the surroundings in reducing postural sway when compared to the no contact, eyes closed condition. Body sway and fingertip forces were essentially in phase with force contact, suggesting that fingertip contact forces are physically counteracting body sway. Time delays between body sway and fingertip forces were much larger with light touch contact, suggesting that the fingertip is providing information that allows anticipatory innervation of musculature to reduce body sway. The results are related to observations on precision grip as well as the somatosensory, proprioceptive, and motor mechanisms involved in the reduction of body sway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson AJ (1982) The vestibular sensory system. In: Barlow HB, Mollon JD (eds) The senses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 333–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt T, Büchele W, Arnold F (1977) Arthrokinetic nystagmus and ego-motion sensation. Exp Brain Res 30:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess PR, Wei JY, Clark FJ, Simon J (1982) Signaling of kinesthetic information by peripheral sensory receptors. Ann Rev Neurosci 5:171–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia MJ, Guedry FE (1966) Modification of vestibular responses as a function of rate of rotation about an Earth-horizontal axis. Acta Otolaryngol 62:297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichgans J, Brandt T (1973) Visual-vestibular interaction. Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R, Leibowitz HW, Teuber HL (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 755–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener HC, Dichgans J, Guschlbauer B, Mau H (1984) The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia. Brain Res 296:103–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon G (1978) Active touch. The mechanism of recognition of objects by manipulation: a multi-disciplinary approach. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurfinkel VS, Levik YS (1994)The suppression of cervico-ocular response by the haptokinetic information about the contact with a rigid, immobile object. Exp Brain Res

  • Holden M, Ventura J, Lackner JR (1987) In fluence of light touch from the hand on postural sway. Soc Neurosci Abstr 13 (1):348

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holden M, Ventura J, Lackner JR (1994) Stabilization of posture by precision contact of the index finger. J Vest Res 4:285–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP (1986) The perception of posture, self motion and the visual vertical. In: Boff KR, Kaufmann L, Thomas JP (eds) Sensory processes and perception. (Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 1). Wiley, New York, pp 18–1–18–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hullinger M, Nordh E, Thelin A-E, Vallbo ÅB (1979) The responses of afferent fibres from the gabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. J Physiol (Lond) 291:233–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS (1991) How is grasping modified by somatosensory input? In: Humphrey DR, Freund H-J (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley, New York, pp 331–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1992) Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Ann Rev Neurosci 15:227–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz D (1950) Gestalt psychology: its nature and significance. Ronald, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Tuller B (1983) ‘Compensatory articulation’ under conditions of reduced afferent information: a dynamic formation. J Speech Hear Res 26:218–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk RE (1982) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  • Knibestöl M (1975) Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol (Lond) 345:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR (1981) Some contributions of touch, pressure and kinesthesis to human spatial orientation and oculomotor control Acta Astronautica 8(8):825–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR (1992) Multimodal and motor influences on orientation: implications for adapting to weightless and virtual environments. J Vest Res 2:307–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1978a) Some influences of touch and pressure cues on human spatial orientation. Aviat Space Environ Med 49:798–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1978b) Postural illusions experienced during z-axis recumbent rotation and their dependence on somatosensory stimulation of the body surface. Aviat Space Environ Med 49:484–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, DiZio P (1984) Some efferent and somatosensory influences on body orientation and oculomotor control. In: Wooten R, Spillman L (eds) Sensory experience, adaptation and perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1981) Human postural responses. Brain 104:513–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1981) Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle. J Physiol (Lond) 320:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1988) Proprioceptors and their contribution to somatosensory mapping: complex messages require complex processing. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66:430–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauritz KH, Dichgans J, Hufschmidt A (1979) Quantitative analysis of stance in late cortical cerebellar atrophy of the anterior lobe and other forms of cerebellar ataxia. Brain 102:461–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashner LM (1976) Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res 26:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashner LM (1981) Analysis of stance posture in humans. In: Towe A, Luschei E (eds) Motor coordination. (Handbook of behavioural neurobiology, vol 5) Plenum Press, New York, pp27–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashner LM (1982) Adaptation of human movement to altered environments. Trends Neurosci 5:358–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips CG (1985) Movements of the hand. Liverpool University, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Senders V (1958) Measurement and statistics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MA, Whitehouse JM, LaMotte RH (1990) Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. J Neurophysiol 63(6):1323–1332

    Google Scholar 

  • Westling G, Johansson RS (1987) Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans. Exp Brain Res 66:128–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS (1990) Assessment of balance control in humans. Med Prog Technol 16:31–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeka, J.J., Lackner, J.R. Fingertip contact influences human postural control. Exp Brain Res 79, 495–502 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229188

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229188

Key words

Navigation