Abstract
A political activist needs to pick up early warning signals that “something is happening” which might require his attention. The “something” could be an emergent danger or opportunity. An ideal-typical warning system is postulated to account for what is believed to be the extraordinary infrequency of activists being caught off guard under most “routine” conditions. Such a system would ideally meet four criteria: rapidity, comprehensiveness, validity, and selectivity. The postulated system rests on what Anthony Downs has called “subformal” communications channels among individuals and groups interrelated by principles of specialization and the division of labor.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am very grateful to Janice Holve for her valuable assistance in gathering data and in helping to sharpen my ideas. In the early stages of this project, Gene Bretton helped conduct a review of the literature. Aaron Wildavsky, David Kirp, Marcel Teitler, and Jack Citrin read and commented on various drafts. Financial support from the National Institute of Mental Health is also gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bardach, E. Subformal warning systems in the species Homo politicus . Policy Sci 5, 415–431 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147228
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147228