Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment Interruption in HIV Therapy: a SMART Strategy?

  • What’s New in HIV/AIDS
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Continuous HAART is standard of care for HIV-infected patients but lifelong adherence and tolerance are important concerns. Use of ART is associated with potential risks, e. g., adverse events, metabolic and cardiovascular complications, and HIV resistance. Stopping HIV therapy may reduce costs and side effects, but carries the risk of increased immune suppression and of emergence of resistance. Treatment interruption is a strategy of much interest, but its safety and efficacy have not been established. The clinical and biological characteristics that influence the outcome of structured treatment interruptions have not been fully clarified. In the following we will present the results of recent studies aimed to compare the long-term consequences of two antiretroviral-management strategies: continuous therapy versus scheduled treatment interruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. D. Goebel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jülg, B., Goebel, F.D. Treatment Interruption in HIV Therapy: a SMART Strategy?. Infection 34, 186–188 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-006-6306-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-006-6306-y

Keywords

Navigation