Skip to main content
Log in

A clinical pharmacokinetic study comparing two azelastine hydrochloride nasal formulations in a single-dose design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Azelastine hydrochloride is a potent second-generation antihistamine, available in Europe and the USA as a nasal spray formulation for the treatment of allergic rhinitis symptoms. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Consumer Healthcare has developed a new nasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride. The present study was aimed at comparing the clinical pharmacokinetic profiles and assessing the bioequivalence of the new formulation of azelastine hydrochloride with a marketed reference nasal spray product. This was a randomized, two-way crossover, two-stage, single-dose pharmacokinetic study with 2 weeks washout between the two treatment periods. A dosage of 0.28 mg of the test and reference products was administered as a single dose to healthy volunteers according to the crossover design. Twenty-three subjects (15 subjects from stage 1 and 8 subjects from stage 2) were enrolled in the study. Adjusted mean values for AUC0–t were 1,526.8 h pg/mL for the test drug and 1,441.5 h pg/mL for the reference drug; for C max the values were 61.59 pg/mL for the test drug and 58.21 pg/mL for the reference drug. The 94.12 % CI of geometric mean ratios (test/reference) were 0.99–1.13 and 0.95–1.18 for AUC0–t and C max. This met the predefined criteria for bioequivalence between test and reference drugs. Secondary pharmacokinetic parameters for azelastine and for the metabolite desmethyl azelastine, AUC(0–∞) and t max, were numerically similar between the two study treatments. Both test and reference azelastine hydrochloride formulations were well tolerated at single dose. This study demonstrated the bioequivalence between the new azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray formulation and the marketed reference Allergodil® after single-dose administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA et al (2008) Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy 63:8–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casale TB (1989) The interaction of azelastine with human lung histamine H1, beta, and muscarinic receptor binding sites. J Allergy Clin Immunol 83:771–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cawello W (1999) Parameters for compartment-free pharmacokinetics. Shaker, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand N, Pillar J, Nolan K, Diamantis W, Sofia RD (1989) Inhibition of allergic and nonallergic leukotriene C4 formation and histamine secretion by azelastine: implications for its mechanism of action. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 90:67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciprandi G, Pronzato C, Passalacqua G et al (1996) Topical azelastine reduces eosinophil activation and intercellular adhesion molecule-I expression on nasal epithelial cells: an anti-allergic activity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 98:1088–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hills M, Armitage P (1979) The two period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 8:7–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito H, Nakamura Y, Takagi S, Sakai K (1998) Effects of azelastine on the level of serum interluekin-4 and soluble CD23 antigen in the treatment of nasal allergy. Arzneimittelforschung 48:1143–1147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieber K, Baumgarten C, Rathsack R, Furkert J, Laake E, Müller S, Kunkel G (1993) Effect of azelastine on substance P content in bronchoalveolar and nasal lavage fluids of patients with allergic asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 23:69–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ, Smith RA (2007) Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com), Pharmaceutical statistics. doi: 10.1002/pst.294

  • Shinoda M, Watanabe N, Suko T, Mogi G, Takeyama M (1997) Effects of anti-allergic drugs on substance P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in nasal secretions. Am J Rhinol 11:237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DV, Dykewicz MS, Bernstein DI et al (2008) Diagnosis and management of rhinitis: an updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol 122:S1–S84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zechel HJ, Brock N, Lenke D, Achterrath-Tuckermann U (1981) Pharmacological and toxicological properties of azelastine, a novel anti-allergic agent. Arzneimittelforschung 31:1184–1193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the excellent help in preparing the manuscript and support of the study by Renata Perego, Elena Tedeschi and Sharron Ashburner. We also thank Dr. Nick P. Kronfield and Mairead North for their critical discussion of the study design and manuscript review. This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Du.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, D., Targett, D., Stolberg, E. et al. A clinical pharmacokinetic study comparing two azelastine hydrochloride nasal formulations in a single-dose design. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 39, 69–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-013-0134-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-013-0134-0

Keywords

Navigation