Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Breeding Habitat and Landscape Correlates of Frog Diversity and Abundance in a Tropical Agricultural Landscape

  • Article
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biodiversity values of temporary pools in tropical ecosystems are poorly understood. Such wetlands are often threatened by agriculture. Constructed pools provide a means to mitigate for loss of natural pools but design features associated with restoration successful are not known. In this paper, we evaluated the effects of environmental variables at local (breeding pools) and regional spatial scales (landscape configuration) on species richness and abundance of anurans in heavily altered landscapes of southeastern Brazil. Frog and toad communities of 18 constructed temporary breeding pools were sampled every 2 weeks from October 2008 to March 2009. Two variables—hydroperiod and percentage of vegetation in the interior of the pools—explained 62% of species richness variation. Three other variables—pool area, distance of pools to forest fragments, and distance of pools to road—explained between 22 and 46% of the variation in frog and toad abundance. Our results indicate that local- and regional-scale variables, and their interaction, are important drivers of the structure of frog and toad communities in these agricultural landscapes. To facilitate amphibian conservation we suggest that cattle ranchers create and maintain heavily vegetated temporary pools near protected forest reserves as both a water source for livestock and breeding habitat for amphibians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AmphibiaWeb (2011) Information on amphibian biology and conservation. [web application]. Berkeley, California: AmphibiaWeb. Available via DIALOG, http://amphibiaweb.org/. Accessed 31 Jan 2011

  • Babbitt KJ, Baber MJ, Childers DL, Hocking D (2009) Influence of agricultural upland habitat type on larval anuran assemblages in seasonally inundated wetlands. Wetlands 29:294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcha SF, Arid FM (1971) Estudo da evapotranspiração na região norte-ocidental do estado de São Paulo. Revista de Ciências da Faculdade de Ciências e Letras 1:94–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI (2007) Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318:1775–1777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beja P, Alcazar R (2003) Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians. Biological Conservation 114:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford D, Ng TH, Qie L, Kudavidanage EP, Bradshaw CJA (2010) Forest fragment and breeding habitat characteristics explain frog diversity and abundance in Singapore. Biotropica 42:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivant R, Anselin L, Assunção R, Berke O, Bernat A, Carvalho M, Chun Y, Dormann C, Dray S, Halbersma R, Krainski E, Lewin-Koh N, Tiefelsdorf M, Yu D (2009) spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting shemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.4-29. Available via DIALOG, http://cran.at.r-project.org/web/packages/spdep

  • Burne MR, Griffin CR (2005) Habitat associations of pool-breeding amphibians in eastern Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevan A, Sutherland M (1991) Hierarchical partitioning. The American Statistician 45:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2004) EstimateS 8.20: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. User’s guide and application. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs. Available via DIALOG, http://purl.oclc.org/estimates

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1994) Biology of amphibians. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan RS, Paton PWC (2004) Within-pond parameters affecting ovoposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Wetlands 24:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2008) The relative effects of road traffic and forest cover on anuran populations. Biological Conservation 141:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Pedlar JH, Pope SE, Taylor PD, Wegner JF (1995) Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biological Conservation 73:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay CS, Houlahan J (1997) Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in Southeastern Ontario Wetlands. Conservation Biology 11:1000–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost DR (2010) Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Available via DIALOG, http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia. Accessed 23 November 2010

  • Gibbs JP (1998) Amphibian movements in response to forest edges, roads, and streambeds in Southern New England. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer AJ, Parris KM (2011) Local and landscape determinants of amphibian communities in urban ponds. Ecological Applications 21:378–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann HL, Babbitt KJ, Baber MJ, Congalton RG (2005) Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape. Biological Conservation 123:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen DH (1997) Florestas tropicais secas. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversidade, 1st edn. Editora Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro, pp 166–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly CA, Rodrigues RR, Metzger JP, Haddad CFB, Verdade LM, Oliveira MC, Bolzani VS (2010) Biodiversity conservation research, training, and policy in São Paulo. Science 11:1358–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karraker NE, Gibbs JP (2009) Amphibian production in forested landscapes in relation to wetland hydroperiod: a case study of vernal pools and beaver ponds. Biological Conservation 142:2293–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laan R, Verboom B (1990) Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg JS, King SL, Grace JB, Walls SC (2006) Habitat associations of chorusing anurans in the lower Mississipi river alluvial valley. Wetlands 26:736–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R (2000) Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between - and reconciliation of - ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:655–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R (2002) Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodiversity and Conservation 11:1397–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nalon MA, Mattos IFA, Franco GADC (2008) Meio físico e aspectos da fragmentação da vegetação. In: Rodrigues RR, Joly CA, de Brito MCW, Paese A, Metzger JP, Casatti L, Nalon MA, Menezes N, Ivanauskas NM, Bolzani V, Bononi VLR (eds) Diretrizes para a restauração e conservação da biodiversidade no Estado de São Paulo, 1st edn. FAPESP, São Paulo, pp 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL (2000) Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto CRV, Forester DC, Snodgrass JW (2007) Influences of wetland and landscape characteristics on the distribution of carpenter frogs. Wetlands 27:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2009) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-96, Available via DIALOG, http://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme

  • Prado VHM, Borges R, Silva FR, Tognolo TT, Rossa-Feres DC (2008) Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae, Phyllomedusa azurea: distribution extension. Check List 4:55–56

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.13.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available via DIALOG, http://www.Rproject.org

  • Reh W, Seitz A (1990) The influence of land use on the genetic structure of populations of the common frog Rana temporaria. Biological Conservation 54:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues RR, Joly CA, de Brito MCW, Paese A, Metzger JP, Casatti L, Nalon MA, Menezes N, Ivanauskas NM, Bolzani V, Bononi VLR (2008) Diretrizes para conservação e restauração da biodiversidade no Estado de São Paulo. FAPESP, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossa-Feres DC, Martins M, Marques OAV, Martins IA, Sawaya RJ, Haddad CFB (2008) Herpetofauna. In: Rodrigues RR, Joly CA, de Brito MCW, Paese A, Metzger JP, Casatti L, Nalon MA, Menezes N, Ivanauskas NM, Bolzani V, Bononi VLR (eds) Diretrizes para a restauração e conservação da biodiversidade no Estado de São Paulo, 1st edn. FAPESP, São Paulo, pp 82–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos TG, Rossa-Feres DC, Casatti L (2007) Diversidade e distribuição espaço-temporal de anuros em região com pronunciada estação seca no sudeste do Brasil. Iheringia 97:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (1998) Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12:1129–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulse CD, Semlitsch RD, Trauth KM, Williams AD (2010) Influences of design and landscape placement parameters on amphibian abundance in constructed wetlands. Wetlands 30:915–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva FR, Rossa-Feres DC (2007) The use of forest fragments by open-area anurans (Amphibia) in northwestern São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 7:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva FR, Rossa-Feres DC (2011) Influence of terrestrial habitat isolation on the diversity and temporal distribution of anurans in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27:327–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva FR, Prado VHM, Vasconcelos TS, Santos TG, Rossa-Feres DC (2009) Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae, Chiasmocleis albopunctata: filling gap and geographic distribution map. Check List 5:314–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva FR, Prado VHM, Rossa-Feres DC (2010) Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae, Dendropsophus melanargyreus (Cope, 1887): distribution extension, new state record and geographic distribution map. Check List 6:402–404

    Google Scholar 

  • SMA/IF (Secretaria do Meio Ambiente / Instituto Florestal) (2005) Inventário florestal da vegetação natural do Estado de São Paulo. Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass JW, Komoroski MJ, Bryan L Jr, Burger J (2000) Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14:414–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland RW, Dunning PR, Baker WM (2010) Amphibian encounter rates on roads with different amounts of traffic and urbanization. Conservation Biology 24:1626–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J (2005) Local and landscape influence on amphibian occurrence and abundance. Ecology 86:1936–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos TS, Rossa-Feres DC (2005) Diversidade, distribuição espacial e temporal de anfíbios anuros (Amphibia, Anura) na região noroeste do estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 5:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassens S, Hall A, Osborne W, Watts RJ (2010) Habitat characteristics predict occupancy patterns of the endangered amphibian Litoria raniformis in flow-regulated flood plain wetlands. Austral Ecology 35:944–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Relyea RA, Yurewicz KL, Skelly DK, Davis CJ (2009) Comparative landscape dynamics of two anuran species: climate-driven interaction of local and regional processes. Ecological Monographs 79:503–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP - grants 07/50738-5 and 04/04820-3); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - Programa de Doutorado no País com Estágio no Exterior (PDEE - grant 1186/09-4), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq - grant to D.C. Rossa-Feres).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia João Leme dos Santos Km 110, Bairro do Itinga, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil

    Fernando Rodrigues da Silva

  2. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, 350 Illick Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    James P. Gibbs

  3. Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho – UNESP, Campus de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

    Denise de Cerqueira Rossa-Feres

Authors
  1. Fernando Rodrigues da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James P. Gibbs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Denise de Cerqueira Rossa-Feres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Rodrigues da Silva.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 264 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva, F.R., Gibbs, J.P. & Rossa-Feres, D.d.C. Breeding Habitat and Landscape Correlates of Frog Diversity and Abundance in a Tropical Agricultural Landscape. Wetlands 31, 1079–1087 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0217-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0217-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation