Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrogeology of non-salt Gachsaran Formation in Iran: an example from the Zagros Range–Tang sorkh Valley

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study area of Tang sorkh Aquifer is located on the northern flank of the Derak anticline, a part of the Zagros Mountain Range, in the central-south of Iran. The study area is limited to undifferentiated non-salt Gachsaran Formation (NSGF), mainly composed of alternative layers of marl and marlstone, and gypsum. This paper is focused on the hydrogeological and hydrochemistry characteristics of the NSGF. A detailed geological cross section, perpendicular to the strike of the GF was prepared by detailed field surveying. The thickness of GF is 1,268 m, with 82 alternative units of marl, marlstone, gypsum, sandstone and limestone. The sub-aquifers are limited to four limestone, five gypsum, and one gypsum-halite units. The waters of these sub-aquifers emerge as springs or seepage into the Tang sorkh River (TR). The average discharge of springs emerging from limestone and gypsum units ranges between 0.3–8.4 and 0.5–0.75 l s−1, respectively. The source for sub-aquifers is mainly recharge from precipitation or river water. Marly layers disconnect the hydraulic connection between the sub-aquifers, directing the general flow parallel to the strikes. The lack of sinkholes and caves in the gypsum units is due to the small thickness of sub-aquifers, and consequently, low amounts of recharge water. The springs are classified into four groups based on their lithology, electrical conductivity, type of water, and trend of ion-concentration. The type of water in most of the springs is calcium-sulfate. The electrical conductivity is the main parameter to differentiate the hydrochemistry of the groups. The hydrochemistry of springs depends on the recharge from the TR, and the lithology of sub-aquifers and their adjacent units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghanabati A (2004) Geology of Iran. Geological Society of Iran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghdam J (2012) Hydrogeology of gypsum formations in the south of Iran. University of Shiraz, Iran, Ph.D. dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashjari J, Raeisi E (2006) Lithological control on water chemistry in karst aquifers of the Zagros Range. Iran. Cave and karst Scie 33(3):111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahroudi A, Koyi HA (2004) Tectonic-sedimentary framework of the gachsaran formation in the Zagros foreland basin. J. Mar and Petrol Geol 21:1295–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnington HV (1968) Salt-tectonic features of Northern Iraq. In R. B. Mattox (Ed.), Saline deposits: A symposium based on papers from the International Conference on Saline Deposits. Geological Society of America (GSA), Special Paper 88. Houston, TX

  • Edgell HS (1996) Salt tectonics in the Persian Gulf basin. In G. L. Alsop, D. L. Blundell, & I. Davison (Eds.), Salt tectonics. Geological Society of Londan, Special Publication 100

  • Falcon NL (1967) The geology of the north-east margin of the Arabian basement shield. Advance Science London, pp. 31–42

  • James GA, Wynd JD (1965) Stratigraphic Nomenclture of Iranian Oil Consortium Agreement Area. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Bull 49(12):2182–2245

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KS (1981) Dissolution of salt on the east flank of the Permian Basin in the southwestern USA. J Hydrol 54:75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KS (1997) Evaporite karst in the United States. Carbonates and Evap 12(1):2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KS (2003) Evaporite-karst problems in the United States. In: Johnson KS, Neal JT (eds) Evaporite karst and engineering/environmental problems in the United States. Okla Geol Surv Circ,vol 109:1–20

  • Johnson KS (2008) Evaporite-Karst problems and studies in the USA. J Environ Geol 53:937–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez JD, Johnson KS, Neal JT (1998) Sinkholes in evaporate rocks. Am Sci 86:38–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Murris RJ (1980) Middle East: stratigraphic evolution and oil habitat. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Bull 64:597–618

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien CAE (1957) Salt diapirism in South Persia. Geol en Mijnbouw 19:337–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Oveisi B (2001) Resume of Kelestan geological map report. G.S.I.. Scale 1:100000, sheet N. 6449

  • Raeisi E, Moore F (1993) Hydrochemistry of Karst Springs from Two Carbonates Units in Zagros sides of Iran. J Sci, Islamic Repub Iran 4:302–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Sto¨cklin J (1968) Salt deposits of the Middle East. In R. B. Mattox (Ed.), Saline deposits: A symposium based on papers from the International Conference on Saline Deposits. GSA, Special Paper 88. Houston, Texas

  • Stocklin J, Setudehnia A (1977) Stratigraphic lexicon of Iran. GSI, Tehran 370 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported financially by Shiraz University. The authors would like to thank the Karst Research Center of Iran and the Fars Regional Water Authority for providing us with data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezzat Raeisi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aghdam, J.A., Raeisi, E., Zare, M. et al. Hydrogeology of non-salt Gachsaran Formation in Iran: an example from the Zagros Range–Tang sorkh Valley. Carbonates Evaporites 28, 309–319 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-012-0113-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-012-0113-6

Keywords

Navigation